billabong Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 It just makes too much sense to deal an aging asset for a rebuilding team we all hope gaudette finishes the season with the canucks ala boeser did last season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentSam Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Add to him and upgrade for another pending UFA E Karlsson. OTW is about to rebuild like others. Doubt if Karlsson wants to go through that from the start.. we have rounded the corner on a rebuild. My hunch, but front loaded, for aprx. 9m per, he would sign here for 6 years. not an old player, just needs Re-kindling with our youth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckylager Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 1 hour ago, riffraff said: Hurt all the freakin time. Ftfy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 I would do something like Tanev and Vanek @ 50% for Foote + TB 2018 - 1st + TB 2018 - 2nd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superlative Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superlative Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustABandwagoner Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 1 hour ago, MJDDawg said: But is that level? Third pairing d-man? The bar doesn't seem very high right now to trade a top pairing d-man for. Tanev is not a top pairing D-man. Maybe on this team, but on other teams nah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush17 Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 1 hour ago, prix57 said: I been wanting to trade Tanev for a while now. He is a good dman no question but lets be honest, he is 28 and the most games he has played in a season were 70, he makes Salo look like an ironman. He should be traded before his stock plummets more. He is in his prime and should be dealt but it sucks he is now injured. Seems to always be the case when we have a decent available asset at the deadline... Yeah his injuries definitely are becoming a concern. If a team deems him a good #3 D man Tho. With reduced minutes he might be able to stay healthy longer. What does he lot when healthy does anyone know? 24-26? Maybe scale him back to 20-22 minute's per game against less leathal shooters maybe he can stay healthy longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush17 Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 10 minutes ago, DontMessMe said: Tanev is not a top pairing D-man. Maybe on this team, but on other teams nah I think he's a solid #3 on a very good team. Maybe if u want more offensive you stack him on the 1st pairing to balance out offense on the first 2. I think he needs less ice time and he needs to stop blocking so many shots. He could have a long career still if just stopping taking so many bullets to the legs. He probably walks around all season with massive bruises on his legs. Can't imagine that's comfortable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
combover Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 If it’s means we can Get a big return and more help the future which is the only thing that really matters right now, then it would make the most sense to trade him. He won’t be here when the team turns around and if he is his effectiveness will not. I like tanev but don’t see the value in keeping a player who’s value seems to be peaking while the team is so thin now and in the future at every position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 1 hour ago, Down by the River said: TDL is Feb 26th and Tanev is out until the 23rd: I really like Tanev, but he is one of the least elusive top-4 dmen I've ever seen. Him and Hjarmalsson are perfectly fine skaters, but they always seem to find ways to get demolished. If you can't manage to play 80% of your team's game on a regular basis, you're really not as valuable as your skill level makes you appear. It is hard to point fingers at a guy like Tanev because he is such a warrior for his team, but part of the value in a player is their ability to remain healthy. Tanev can't do this, and the result is that this team is consistently needing to ask other players to fill roles that are beyond their ability. Thanks. For some reason I had it in my head as 10 games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 27 minutes ago, Rush17 said: Yeah his injuries definitely are becoming a concern. If a team deems him a good #3 D man Tho. With reduced minutes he might be able to stay healthy longer. What does he lot when healthy does anyone know? 24-26? Maybe scale him back to 20-22 minute's per game against less leathal shooters maybe he can stay healthy longer. His career ATOI (and this season's) is just under 20 mins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckylager Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Anyways, all this talk about Tanev is just talk. JB even said he won't move him unless "someone knock our socks off" (lol, such an old schooler. JB. Socks.) I don't see any "sock knocker offer" offers to roll in for an oft injured shut down specific Dman. So, I'm really excited for Gaudette. I'll have to dig up an old thread if he doesn't sign pronto after his college year is finished. If not, hopefully JB could trade his rights to his fave childhood team, but JB is big on drafting charade and kids with good character would usual have honour in there. He showed up huge in the biggest game of his young career. We need big game players, seems to be something we've lacked. I hope JB can reel this kid in ASAP and get him out there like he did with Brock last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beni Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Tanev is Salo 2.0 without the offensive upside. On a rebuilding team I see no issue trading an extremely injury prone player. Sure, he is good when he is healthy. But he has had no luck here. Maximize the return, dont see his value increasing at all in the coming seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blömqvist Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Tanev + Juolevi to Arizona for OEL + Domi. You heard it here first guys. #insider Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Darned if you do and darned if you don't really. Try and trade him now and JB's going to get low-balled for sure. Do trade him and who exactly is going to show any of the kids arriving in the near future how to play sound D in their own zone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flickyoursedin Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Damn I was hoping for a Tanev haul and getting another 1rst rounder in the upcoming draft looks like that’s probably out of the question. Worth less next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 3 hours ago, Zfetch said: That's an awful trade For Tampa yes. For us it's awesome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6string Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 One more season with Tanev will retain his stock on the market, the Canucks can benefit from this by having his stewardship for the young D and then later move him for assets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcam Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 2 hours ago, aGENT said: It wasn't actually a 'trade (proposal)' FWIW. Those are the main pieces I'd want back. I don't really care what the periphery pieces are. We'd likely need to take some salary/a warm body back (Coburn?) as well. The main parts I'd want back though are Foot and their late 1st. Which is a perfectly good start to a package IMO. YMMV. Foote was top 20 pick last year?? You will not get Foote 19, 6'5, GP 55, PTs 63 Kelowna Along with this years 1st round pick.... Nobody will give 2 first round picks for Tanev who is hurt lots.. Maybe Foote and a young prospect on farm.... Like your idea but that would be a heavy price tag.. Us Canuck fans always think are players are worth more.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.