Monty Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 Shocked an amazed how much you guys think he should be getting. Is Chris Tanev a sound defensive defenseman? Yes. Can he provide a lot of offense? No. (10points) Has he played a lot of games in the NHL? No. (104 regular season and playoff games) Is he in the top 10 of the best strictly defensive defensemen in the NHL today? No. CDC Logic: $1.5 to upwards of $3.5 million per year. Wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonMexico Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 With the voynov and Jodi deals I am more uncertain on what kinda money he'll get... Would 3m be so out of the question, considering it all? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 I think we are talking about a bridge deal here of $1.8-$2 million per season 3 year length making us that much more desperate to part with salary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outsiders Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 sign Tanev to 3 year 2 mill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 15 year 30 million Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franksedin Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 15 year 30 million Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apricot Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 Tanev's dad is helping him out with a new contract? Uh oh, next think you know he's going to demand more ice time.. I joke, I joke Alittle... Kinda... Sorta... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pavel_Bure 10 Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 sign Tanev to 3 year 2 mill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Goose Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 "In the best interests of Christopher, we have decided to get an agent involved at this stage of the game," said Mike Tanev on Monday morning from his Toronto home. "His expertise will hopefully bring this to a quick conclusion. (Chris) wants to play his best hockey in Vancouver. He loves it out there." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogbyte Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 I would think a two year deal for around $1.5-$1.75 mil will be the goal. He deserves a raise but not that much of one. Unfortunately for him he plays with great cool but he hasn't figured out how to contribute offensively at all and he's had some injuries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 I would think a two year deal for around $1.5-$1.75 mil will be the goal. He deserves a raise but not that much of one. Unfortunately for him he plays with great cool but he hasn't figured out how to contribute offensively at all and he's had some injuries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apples Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 I'm hoping around 2 to 3 mil for 2 or 3 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobopan Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 No way he gets 2.5 per.. What did Subban sign for again???.. stricly defensive d-man make far less than their offensive counterparts.. im gonna guess in the ballpark of a 4 year deal x $5.5 total. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honeydew Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 I bet Tanev will sign exactly almost similar to what Del Zotto signed for in 2012 season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Vanderhoek Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 I would suggest overpayment if he gets more than 1.5m per over a multi year deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzle Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 There is no real detail regarding a contract agreed upon in principle denoted in that. Further the wording "hopefully" is Dad talk for "lets get this moving along". OP is still misleading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 The OP is not misleading anyone. "His expertise will hopefully bring this to a quick conclusion. (Chris) wants to play his best hockey in Vancouver. He loves it out there." That's a pretty clear statement by someone fairly representative - his father - that he wants both a quick resolution and to be here. 3 yrs, 5 million. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Goose Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Fair enough-I guess I was just expecting more specific details contractually speaking. Looking forward to him re-signing soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 He brings no offence or physicality, just good solid defensive play and gets the puck out of our zone clearly. Considering point-scoring seems to attract the big bucks, he should sign for no more than 2M. Honestly we can't afford much more. Corrado should be in our lineup for around 40 games next season as our #6 guy, sharing the play with Alberts and hopefully a veteran depth defenceman to complement all this youth on the blueline. Hamhuis - Bieksa Edler - Corrado Garrison - Tanev Alberts Around 20M for 7 guys on the back end is pretty reasonable, but that is a VERY young defence with no calming veteran presence. These guys like Bieksa, Edler, Corrado and Tanev are all very nervous and in big pressure games they've been seen cracking (especially the last 2 playoffs). We still need a veteran D-man (similar to Oduya/Roszival/Redden's impact) to round this group out or they'll collapse in the post season again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.