qwijibo Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 2 minutes ago, Me_ said: VAN 1st 2018 1st 2019 Sergachev MTL D. Sedin H. Sedin No. Just no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 2 minutes ago, Me_ said: Canucks retain. Next season, even at 50% retention, that's still 7 million on the Hab's Cap. I like your proposal, but don't see the Habs doing this without us taking some crappy contracts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 2 minutes ago, Alflives said: Next season, even at 50% retention, that's still 7 million on the Hab's Cap. I like your proposal, but don't see the Habs doing this without us taking some crappy contracts. Trade deadlines are for that. Canadiens trade contracts out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 I could see Pitt calling on Edler and Hansen given injuries to Daley (plays on their top pair) and Maata (plays on their 2nd pair). Canucks would have to maintain salary in a major way. But there is really nothing Pitt would trade that is exciting - Pouliot is underwhelming, so is sprong, even more so, maybe Pouliot and a 1st for edler with slary retained? still thats a late first in a week draft. I'd do sbisa + Hansen for a first and 3rd we'd retiain salary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 21 minutes ago, missioncanucksfan said: Wash just traded their 1st and 2nd to STL for Shattenkirk Bowey please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 1 minute ago, Me_ said: Trade deadlines are for that. Canadiens trade contracts out. Montreal refused to trade Sergachev for Duchene. They aren't going to trade him for 2 36 year olds who are badly in decline Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 NYR need speed and a top 6 forward in a bad way. They should be on the edler/hansen train hard! Skjei and a first for edler and Hansen, salary retained. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeefcakeBo Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 4 minutes ago, Canucks Curse said: NYR need speed and a top 6 forward in a bad way. They should be on the edler/hansen train hard! Skjei and a first for edler and Hansen, salary retained. If the Rangers need a top 6 forward in a bad way why would they be interested in Edler or Hansen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyBoy44 Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 7 minutes ago, Canucks Curse said: NYR need speed and a top 6 forward in a bad way. They should be on the edler/hansen train hard! Skjei and a first for edler and Hansen, salary retained. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaBamba Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 19 minutes ago, J.R. said: Bowey please. We have like 8 Bowey's in our organization. He is redundant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrissex95 Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 21 minutes ago, qwijibo said: Montreal refused to trade Sergachev for Duchene. They aren't going to trade him for 2 36 year olds who are badly in decline Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanisleryan Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 7 minutes ago, LaBamba said: We have like 8 Bowey's in our organization. He is redundant. Exactly I prefer a good pick or a grade A forward prospect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 10 minutes ago, LaBamba said: We have like 8 Bowey's in our organization. He is redundant. No we don't. And getting a Bowey let's you trade another D for said forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaBamba Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 1 minute ago, J.R. said: No we don't. And getting a Bowey let's you trade another D for said forward. Watched him in Kelowna a lot. Very lazy and cumbersome to be honest. He will be a Sbisa at best. Extremely overrated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missioncanucksfan Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 Chicago was said to be very interested in Burrows. Hard not to think they wouldn't circle back for Hansen. With Minny loading up, perhaps Hansen helps their bottom 6 in the best way. Would just look weird lining up with Toews eh? Perhaps we can get Forsling back. Can't see why they wouldn't cough up their 1st Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 13 minutes ago, J.R. said: No we don't. And getting a Bowey let's you trade another D for said forward. Bowey, in Jr, played a lot like Burns does in SJ. He was very much a rover, and dominated games in that role. You cant teach a player to see the game that way. If the Canucks can get their hands on him, he could change the way the team plays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hortankin Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 11 minutes ago, missioncanucksfan said: Chicago was said to be very interested in Burrows. Hard not to think they wouldn't circle back for Hansen. With Minny loading up, perhaps Hansen helps their bottom 6 in the best way. Would just look weird lining up with Toews eh? Perhaps we can get Forsling back. Can't see why they wouldn't cough up their 1st id take Forsling and a 1st.. id rather try and get a LAK 1st for the potential lottery ticket Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 17 minutes ago, Hortankin said: id take Forsling and a 1st.. id rather try and get a LAK 1st for the potential lottery ticket VAN Schmaltz CHI Hansen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shiftynifty Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 With Burrows off the books and with us not retaining any salary in that deal (how is that even possible?), I can see us taking on a bad contract when trading Hansen; getting a 1st and a good prospect is possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Weasel Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 I can't wait to see the return for hansen. Should be damn good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.