LaBamba Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 10 minutes ago, J.R. said: I'm not reading self re-quotes, sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 Max Jones would be an interesting return from ANA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 Just now, LaBamba said: I'm not reading self re-quotes, sorry. Too bad, you might stop posting things that are wrong...lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 27 minutes ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: Considering what Burrows just netted us, I think it's pretty obvious that "taking what we can get" for Hansen would be an absolutely laughable decision. Hopefully we get a similar deal done to the Burrows one with Hansen. If there is a deal to be done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missioncanucksfan Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 5 minutes ago, theminister said: Max Jones would be an interesting return from ANA. So would Jacob Larsson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian42 Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 4 minutes ago, N7Nucks said: Hopefully we get a similar deal done to the Burrows one with Hansen. If there is a deal to be done. I would expect a better return. The return for Burrows was great but the prices for Hanzal, Boyle were also good. Teams like Montreal and Pittsburgh will still be wanting to add and Hansen said it's possible he would waive even for a team not on his list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nazzymx Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 I wouldn't mind a 2018 1st rd pick for Hansen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 4 minutes ago, missioncanucksfan said: So would Jacob Larsson I thought you were adamant that Hasnen and Miller wouldn't net a single prospect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 2 minutes ago, theminister said: I thought you were adamant that Hasnen and Miller wouldn't net a single prospect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missioncanucksfan Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 4 minutes ago, theminister said: I thought you were adamant that Hasnen and Miller wouldn't net a single prospect? I stand by my words....hope I eat them too But you stated your wish.... I stated mine....nothing to see here....move along Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyIe Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 25 minutes ago, Hortankin said: some thought Burrows would fetch a 3rd at best.. its a sellers market this year Let me bring you back to reality. Nick Schmaltz was a first round pick, he was a pivotal piece in UND winning the Frozen Four, he's having an above average rookie year in the NHL this year and here's the key part, he's still in his first year ELC which means he comes cheap, such an important thing for a team up against the cap like Chicago. On top of that you think, Bowman, will throw in another pick let alone a first? Yea, maybe if we were giving him Hansen and Virtanen. Washington maybe in win now mode but their GM knows that this year or next maybe when their window closes. Bowey is arguably their most NHL ready prospect on D. I can see a straight up trade between Bowey and Hansen. Montreal is also in win now mode but Sergachev has the potential to be a top pairing D. He's big, fast and has excellent offensive instincts. Other than Weber, Montreal doesn't have anyone in their system like Sergachev. Can you really see Bergevin, one of the shrewdest GM's in the league trading his team's best defensive prospect for a player that may potentially lose to Vegas? Again, Hansen and Virtanen for Sergachev seems more likely. There's optimistic and then there's stone cold crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 5 minutes ago, RyIe said: Let me bring you back to reality. Nick Schmaltz was a first round pick, he was a pivotal piece in UND winning the Frozen Four, he's having an above average rookie year in the NHL this year and here's the key part, he's still in his first year ELC which means he comes cheap, such an important thing for a team up against the cap like Chicago. On top of that you think, Bowman, will throw in another pick let alone a first? Yea, maybe if we were giving him Hansen and Virtanen. Washington maybe in win now mode but their GM knows that this year or next maybe when their window closes. Bowey is arguably their most NHL ready prospect on D. I can see a straight up trade between Bowey and Hansen. Montreal is also in win now mode but Sergachev has the potential to be a top pairing D. He's big, fast and has excellent offensive instincts. Other than Weber, Montreal doesn't have anyone in their system like Sergachev. Can you really see Bergevin, one of the shrewdest GM's in the league trading his team's best defensive prospect for a player that may potentially lose to Vegas? Again, Hansen and Virtanen for Sergachev seems more likely. There's optimistic and then there's stone cold crazy. having watched a lot of MB with the Rockets, I would be thrilled with a straight up trade there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 Id do Hansen for Juulsen or Hansen for a 1st does Toronto even have 7 forwards they want to protect? hansen + Subban for their 1st 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 43 minutes ago, RyIe said: Hate to be a downer but none of those scenarios seem likely. Hard to see any of those teams giving away grade A prospects and adding something on top of that. Just remind us, what did Bickel and Terravainen net Chicago last year? Vermette? Polak? Hansen is worth what a GM will pay and your name on the cup is eternal while the name on a jersey isn't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 3 minutes ago, stawns said: having watched a lot of MB with the Rockets, I would be thrilled with a straight up trade there. Me too. He's a more skilled yet fractionally less angry Bieksa. Pure leader Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 Hansen + Subban + CBJ 2nd for Bowey raymond Ballard 1st Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
komodo0921 Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 Has there been any indication of what teams might be on the list? I'm curious to know who the "personal choice" is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 1 minute ago, komodo0921 said: Has there been any indication of what teams might be on the list? I'm curious to know who the "personal choice" is. Probably Winnipeg as his personal choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 I bet MTL, Ott, TOR, CGY, EDM are on the list. He likes Canada and this are all still somewhat close to Winnipeg his "personal choice" i bet NYR is on that list because of AV, but I have no clue what the final team is? Pitt? Chance to play with Crosby or malkin I'm a contract year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyIe Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 6 minutes ago, Warhippy said: Just remind us, what did Bickel and Terravainen net Chicago last year? Vermette? Polak? Hansen is worth what a GM will pay and your name on the cup is eternal while the name on a jersey isn't Bickel and Terravainen were largely cap related trades. Bickel had an egregious contract so Chicago basically had to add Terravainen, who they wouldn't have been able to afford to resign anyway. Hansen is a good player but he isn't on Vermentte's level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.