J.I.A.H.N Posted March 20, 2019 Author Share Posted March 20, 2019 32 minutes ago, HerrDrFunk said: Well, if we’re being loud in here: SPENDING CAP TO BUY OUT LUCIC WHEN THE KIDS NEED TO BE RE-SIGNED ISN’T WORTH THE PICKS! Shhh ...its past 10 pm...no more yelling!………..Yeah but it is only 1.333 a year...………..that can be hidden if one of those picks evolve and is on an ELC, while paying the bill down, that in hind sight is the point, I guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastal.view Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 3 hours ago, janisahockeynut said: Ok, OK, Ok, …...read it first.lol Lucic (2 Million retained per year) to Vancouver for Edmonton 2019 2nd NYI 2019 3rd Edmonton's 2020 2nd How we deal with Lucic A)….Let him earn a spot...………...Could he actually play with EP and Boeser?...…….he would be one Hell of a net presence....but I don't see that happening B)….Trade him...……………………Maybe if we retained 2 million a year, some one might give us a 3rd or 4th...………(cost $2 M X 4 yrs = 8 Million) C)….Buy Out...……………………...We owe $4 Million X 4 years = 16 M X 2/3's = $10,666,672 over 8 years = $ 1,333,334 per year for 8 years Personally, I think the Canucks can handle the 1.3 per year Is it worth it? why? why waste the words considering lucic? option C is not the buy out amount . his contract is basically fully guaranteed the 2/3 only applies to the actual salary the bonuses are paid 100% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glug Datt Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 how about this... we trade Eriksson for Lucic and McDavid 50% retained.. and waive Lucic.. I'd do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChuckNORRIS4Cup Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 I tried to read it but couldn't, the majority of it is crossed out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 If we're not getting a first round pick in exchange, then it's not worth it. Quality over quantity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AC Readership Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 I'd want a 1st and Bouchard. The Canucks would be helping out a division rival and Lucic's contract is for another 4 years, that's why my price is so steep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khay Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 11 hours ago, janisahockeynut said: Ok, OK, Ok, …...read it first.lol OK.... Quote Lucic (2 Million retained per year) to Vancouver for Edmonton 2019 2nd NYI 2019 3rd Edmonton's 2020 2nd We are actually giving them something or they are giving them something? Do we own Edmonton's 2nd rounders for 2019 and 2020? Regret reading... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerrDrFunk Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 9 hours ago, janisahockeynut said: Shhh ...its past 10 pm...no more yelling!………..Yeah but it is only 1.333 a year...………..that can be hidden if one of those picks evolve and is on an ELC, while paying the bill down, that in hind sight is the point, I guess I don't know where you're getting this 1.333 number from but it's wrong. The cap hit from buying out his contract would be significantly higher than that: Also, not having Lucic under contract would help out the Oilers. Which completely violates my principle when it comes to the Oilers: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ohthehumanity Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 Lucic can't skate in today's NHL. Louie can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted March 20, 2019 Author Share Posted March 20, 2019 10 hours ago, coastal.view said: why? why waste the words considering lucic? option C is not the buy out amount . his contract is basically fully guaranteed the 2/3 only applies to the actual salary the bonuses are paid 100% Coastal...…………….you are absolutely right and I am wrong...……….. not only on bonuses, but on years also... Good Point Absolutely no point in going further...……………. Mods shut it down! PLZ! PS......I will watch closer in the future...……………. Buyout needs to be around what I "thought" was the actual amount to be even considered...…. I am having a hard time eating the black feathers! Ouch! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted March 20, 2019 Author Share Posted March 20, 2019 1 hour ago, HerrDrFunk said: I don't know where you're getting this 1.333 number from but it's wrong. The cap hit from buying out his contract would be significantly higher than that: Also, not having Lucic under contract would help out the Oilers. Which completely violates my principle when it comes to the Oilers: Yeah..Coastal View pointed out my errors...…... although that is for the full amount My post was based on discounted (2Mill retained amounts) and over 3 years not 4 as is the actual length. I did a poor job...……...I should have researched better..... Sorry! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted March 20, 2019 Author Share Posted March 20, 2019 Lock it up mods Total mess up on my part! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 14 hours ago, janisahockeynut said: Ok, OK, Ok, …...read it first.lol NO 29 minutes ago, janisahockeynut said: PS......I will watch closer in the future...……………. I am having a hard time eating the black feathers! Ouch! 11 minutes ago, janisahockeynut said: Total mess up on my part! You should know better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted March 20, 2019 Author Share Posted March 20, 2019 5 minutes ago, Hutton Wink said: NO You should know better. Yup! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasCanuck Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 Much happier with Oilers being stuck with an un-tradeable boat anchor. Yup, I've thought it through, MUCH happier! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 14 hours ago, hammertime said: Man I don't want to explain to FA or the team that we now have Spooner Loui and Luccic and that yhey should accept it as the greater good of the team. youre bacically saying we plan to suck and you have no chance of ever winning anything here. but hey a couple second round pics totally worth throwing your career away. Come to Van where you will lose all hope. what's wrong with spooner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YEGCanuck Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 12 hours ago, janisahockeynut said: I am going to yell~! WE ARE NOT GOING TO USE HIM>>>>>WE ARE GOING TO BUY HIM OUT! AND TAKE THE ASSESTS AND RUN! PRETTY FRIGGIN SIMPLE! Ya understood Bud, I hear you. My point is simply I want to have zero to do with Lucic, not even in the scenario you propose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seannnp Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 16 hours ago, HerrDrFunk said: Well, if we’re being loud in here: SPENDING CAP TO BUY OUT LUCIC WHEN THE KIDS NEED TO BE RE-SIGNED ISN’T WORTH THE PICKS! It would only be like 1.33 million though, no? The assets alone would be worth it. Would his cap hit still be 6 mil? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerrDrFunk Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 4 minutes ago, Seannnp said: It would only be like 1.33 million though, no? The assets alone would be worth it. Would his cap hit still be 6 mil? 7 hours ago, HerrDrFunk said: I don't know where you're getting this 1.333 number from but it's wrong. The cap hit from buying out his contract would be significantly higher than that: Also, not having Lucic under contract would help out the Oilers. Which completely violates my principle when it comes to the Oilers: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seannnp Posted March 20, 2019 Share Posted March 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, HerrDrFunk said: Thanks, wasn't sure. I wouldn't mind helping out the oilers. I'd want some competition in the division over the next 5-10 years. LA and Anaheim will need to start their rebuild and soon enough SJ will be middle of the pack, approaching their own rebuild. Vegas, Calgary, Vancouver and Edmonton as the top 4 teams in the division moving forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.