Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Waivers] 43 players - Oct. 10, 2021


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, coryberg said:

#9 ... but that's 8 horrible teams ahead of us

 

Just now, mll said:

9th.  

 

BUF ANA SEA NJD CBJ DET SJS LAK VAN

Doesn't SJS drop after claiming Gadj from us?

 

Not sure if any of those other teams have claimed anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME said:

So who thinks Gadjovich would’ve actually made it through this waiver group? :ph34r:

The league trend for bottom six players is specialists in pp/pk/checking ,preferably with speed. Gadj couldn't crack the top 6 pp forward units

so that leaves the other two job openings where he still needs seasoning. I think Benning thought he might slide through waivers for those reasons

and journeymen pk guys are a dime a dozen imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Provost said:

It doesn’t work that way, you don’t lose your position by claiming someone 

I must be conflating my fantasy league rules. Late night last night with a lot of wine, clearly posting through cobwebs :lol:

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mll said:

Seattle has waiver priority over Vancouver.  Philadelphia, Montreal, Washington don't.

I figured we might take a chance on someone for the bottom 6. There were some names I thought were better than what we had. 
 

They must be comfortable with what they got there.  I can’t say I agree as much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, gregthehockeynut said:

The league trend for bottom six players is specialists in pp/pk/checking ,preferably with speed. Gadj couldn't crack the top 6 pp forward units

so that leaves the other two job openings where he still needs seasoning. I think Benning thought he might slide through waivers for those reasons

and journeymen pk guys are a dime a dozen imo.

If journeymen pk guys are a dime a dozen why can’t Benning find any?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, mll said:

Not aware of that ru

13 minutes ago, aGENT said:

I must be conflating my fantasy league rules. Late night last night with a lot of wine, clearly posting through cobwebs :lol:

Standings based (and they don't change over the off-season)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...