Outsiders Posted February 2, 2022 Share Posted February 2, 2022 4 hours ago, mll said: In part to create cap space but Garland should bring back a decent return. Smyl again echoed Rutherford this week saying that cap space is a big issue and that they need to fix that to be able to move forward. Boudreau has a puck mover at the top of his wish list. When Rutherford replaced Johnston with Sullivan he blamed himself for not bringing in enough puck movers. Pittsburgh didn't allow many goals against but felt that their lack of mobility limited their offence. He traded for Daley and Schultz who wasn't known for his defensive play and they went on to win the Cup that season. We can trade so many other players like Dickenson, Pearson, Poolman and Miller/Boeser to create the cap room. I don't buy that narrative at all that's the reason we are looking to trade him. We actually have someone on a good contract but no lets get rid of him cause we need cap space. I'd rather give Rathbone 20 games to end the season here (over Hunt) and see what he can do under an actual NHL coach. I think everyone is gonna be surprised a just how good Rathbone might be. I think Green's system really hurt players like him. Point is any Garland trade now IMO is a short-sighted and panic move. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted February 2, 2022 Share Posted February 2, 2022 3 hours ago, Outsiders said: We can trade so many other players like Dickenson, Pearson, Poolman and Miller/Boeser to create the cap room. I don't buy that narrative at all that's the reason we are looking to trade him. We actually have someone on a good contract but no lets get rid of him cause we need cap space. I'd rather give Rathbone 20 games to end the season here (over Hunt) and see what he can do under an actual NHL coach. I think everyone is gonna be surprised a just how good Rathbone might be. I think Green's system really hurt players like him. Point is any Garland trade now IMO is a short-sighted and panic move. Unless they get a killer deal, I don't see it. On the other hand, they might not feel the same way about CG as Benning did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westcoastcanucks777 Posted February 2, 2022 Share Posted February 2, 2022 Any thoughts on ditching cool but inconsistent boeser but keeping garland a true professional ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 https://bostonhockeynow.com/2022/02/02/nhl-trade-talk-bruins-back-in-on-garland-canucks-love-lysell/ Yes please. I'm not a fan of the idea of trading Garland because grumble grumble Dylan Guenther, but I would seriously consider a trade surrounded Lysell. Was a big fan of his and expected him to be a 10-15 pick. Picking up Lysell would really help the prospect cupboard bounce back a bit, ideally with another pick attached coming out way as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70seven Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 4 minutes ago, Shayster007 said: https://bostonhockeynow.com/2022/02/02/nhl-trade-talk-bruins-back-in-on-garland-canucks-love-lysell/ Yes please. I'm not a fan of the idea of trading Garland because grumble grumble Dylan Guenther, but I would seriously consider a trade surrounded Lysell. Was a big fan of his and expected him to be a 10-15 pick. Picking up Lysell would really help the prospect cupboard bounce back a bit, ideally with another pick attached coming out way as well. Love to see Lysell as a Canuck! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 1 minute ago, 70seven said: Love to see Lysell as a Canuck! As would I. Gotta imagine that Canucks brass have been seeing a fair amount of him in their spare time with him ripping it up on the Giants this year. I wonder if we could get Lysell and a 1st for Garland? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70seven Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Shayster007 said: As would I. Gotta imagine that Canucks brass have been seeing a fair amount of him in their spare time with him ripping it up on the Giants this year. I wonder if we could get Lysell and a 1st for Garland? I doubt that. Either the 1st or Lysell… addition required tho If the goal is cap relief Lysell 2nd Holtz 2nd Kravtsov 2nd Then there’s some room for a potential Miller deal to take salary…. Or to use in offseason. Edited February 3, 2022 by 70seven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPA Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 Any chance getting Carlo? Garland + Poolman for Carlo + 3rd? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 9 minutes ago, BPA said: Any chance getting Carlo? Garland + Poolman for Carlo + 3rd? Might have some chance of Garland + Poolman for Carlo + Debrusk. But we probably have to add as Carlo's worth more than Garland and Debrusk/Poolman largely cancel each other out. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erkayloomeh Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 (edited) 9 hours ago, Outsiders said: We can trade so many other players like Dickenson, Pearson, Poolman and Miller/Boeser to create the cap room. I don't buy that narrative at all that's the reason we are looking to trade him. We actually have someone on a good contract but no lets get rid of him cause we need cap space. I'd rather give Rathbone 20 games to end the season here (over Hunt) and see what he can do under an actual NHL coach. I think everyone is gonna be surprised a just how good Rathbone might be. I think Green's system really hurt players like him. Point is any Garland trade now IMO is a short-sighted and panic move. If we are to trade garland it isn't for cap reasons as it would be with boeser. It would because he small and even though he's Feisty doesn't punish anyone. It's a long standing complaint around here that we are to soft and he's a good trade chip. And Rathbone needs to be brought up only if we're out of the playoff picture. Edited February 3, 2022 by erkayloomeh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 Carlo isn’t as good as Poolman. Poolman skates better, and is smarter. Carlo is a sluggo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 3 minutes ago, Alflives said: Carlo isn’t as good as Poolman. Poolman skates better, and is smarter. Carlo is a sluggo. You really need to stop with the heroin… it is laced with fentanyl and that is no bueno for you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 7 minutes ago, erkayloomeh said: It would because he small and even though he's Feisty doesn't punish anyone. It's a long standing complaint around here that we are to soft and he's a good trade chip. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fanfor42 Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 From Oct 2018 to Oct 2020 JR with Pittsburgh concluded 24 trades. 24. He is going to do some trades folks. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJC Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 16 minutes ago, Provost said: You really need to stop with the heroin… it is laced with fentanyl and that is no bueno for you. Dude’s been eating some bad cat meat for a while now…messed him up altogether 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJC Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 9 minutes ago, fanfor42 said: From Oct 2018 to Oct 2020 JR with Pittsburgh concluded 24 trades. 24. He is going to do some trades folks. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 1 hour ago, 70seven said: Love to see Lysell as a Canuck! 5’10” 175lbs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 9 minutes ago, Me_ said: 5’10” 175lbs I think they'll want a prospect who'll be able to contribute sooner than Lysell will, as well. They need someone in the 20-22 range, imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erkayloomeh Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 1 hour ago, aGENT said: Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kobayashi Maru Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 What about: Garland, Pearson for Lysell, DeBrusk and Zboril Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now