bobbyg43 Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 2 minutes ago, RRypien37 said: So to all those people saying Hansen won't get a 1st? Martin Hanzal just got a 1st. He has never had a 20 goal year, 1.5 million bigger cap hit. Out of + great analogy love it keep the pressure on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckylager Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 12 minutes ago, Brad Marchand said: Every trade thread that ever gets made on CDC inevitably features a "(Insert name of the current Canucks GM), do something!" comment. It didn't make sense back when I joined the forum and it still doesn't. 10 minutes ago, Beary Sweet said: I sure hope we land another 1st with the assets we have. Benning do something please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 One way to look at this though is that Minny did this deal without giving up a prospect and it's the lowest 1st they've potentially ever had. Hanzal slots in as 3C, behind Staal and Koivu, and White replaces Graovac as 4C. Granlund-Koivu-Zucker Parise-Staal-Niederreitter Coyle-Hanzal-Pominville Huala-White-Stewart I'd say very little room for Hansen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkpoet Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 2 minutes ago, canucklehead80 said: One of the problems is you can't make the other guy trade with you. Takes two to tango. You can if you're Brian Burke. All he had to do was threaten to drag you out behind the barn to get what he wanted. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbyg43 Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 11 minutes ago, Odd. said: That's insane. Strome, Domi, Keller, Chychrun, DeAngelo, Duclair, Dvorak, Perlini, Crouse, Langhamer, etc. Potentially Patrick/Hischier, and another 1st round pick. And now that Minnesota's got Ryan White, Jannik Hansen is redundant. Will the Coyotes become next years leafs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAZY_4_NAZZY Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 7 minutes ago, stawns said: This works out in Vancouver's favour. Hanzal was probably the first choice for a lot of teams and now he's gone. Burrows is probably a third choice for a lot of teams, and with one piece out of the running, burrows' value goes up. Teams are now looking at Minny and thinking they are the team to beat and will need to upgrade to keep pace. Agreed, feel like this only has driven up the price for the UFA rentals...however because of Hansen's extra year term, might detract teams of paying high for fear of loss at the expansion draft. If anything if a team trades for him. Hansen is likely just a rental for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 3 minutes ago, canucklehead80 said: One of the problems is you can't make the other guy trade with you. Takes two to tango. three if a player has a movement clause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 9 minutes ago, hatedkid666 said: 1. Hansen and Hanzal are different players everyone relax. 2. Great return for coyotes 3. Wild are going all in this year so its not out of the question for them to make a move for one of our guys. No more cap space left - Russo wrote earlier this week that their limit is max 3M. They've also just signed Carter for depth (he's on waivers en route to the AHL). Looks like they are set. Practice lines today were: Niederreiter Staal Coyle Zucker Koivu Granlund Parise Haula Pominville Stewart Dalpe Schroeder ----- Haula and Hanzal will be C3/C4 and Dalpe out of the lineup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winter Soldier Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 23 minutes ago, The Weasel said: oh &^@# off. one way or another hanzal manages to &^@# our team over. lol. Benning, you better not have &^@#ed up hansen's trade. Point where it was ever said that the Wild were serious about Jannik. I'll wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 10 minutes ago, RRypien37 said: So to all those people saying Hansen won't get a 1st? Martin Hanzal just got a 1st. He has never had a 20 goal year and 1.5 million bigger cap hit. Feels like Dejavu with Bennington 9000 though.... Hey leave Jim alone. He doesn't work on weekends. If I was gm of this team I'm sure I'd put in much more hours than Jimbo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatedkid666 Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 2 minutes ago, mll said: No more cap space left - Russo wrote earlier this week that their limit is max 3M. They've also just signed Carter for depth (he's on waivers en route to the AHL). Looks like they are set. Practice lines today were: Niederreiter Staal Coyle Zucker Koivu Granlund Parise Haula Pominville Stewart Dalpe Schroeder ----- Haula and Hanzal will be C3/C4 and Dalpe out of the lineup. Thats a filthy lineup. Maybe is we retained salary on Hansen and took on a contract? idk, unlikely but just thinking of possible ways Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 6 minutes ago, CRAZY_4_NAZZY said: Agreed, feel like this only has driven up the price for the UFA rentals...however because of Hansen's extra year term, might detract teams of paying high for fear of loss at the expansion draft. If anything if a team trades for him. Hansen is likely just a rental for them. I don't see a big market for non UFA's. I think teams will go for UFA's first and over pay to get them before they are gone. There's too many ripples from non-ufa deals, imo. Sure, you could argue they can be looked upon as a rental, if they are willing to expose him, but what if LV doesnt pick him? Most teams in play have cap issues, and it's a risk to make a move for a player that increases the complexity of their ED strategy. I'm sure there will be some movement there, but I think their value is low at this deadline. If they want to move Hansen, the off season or next deadline is the better move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerry35 Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 2 minutes ago, apollo said: Hey leave Jim alone. He doesn't work on weekends. If I was gm of this team I'm sure I'd put in much more hours than Jimbo. Please don't vote or procreate......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hockey Stache Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 23 minutes ago, The Weasel said: oh &^@# off. one way or another hanzal manages to &^@# our team over. lol. Benning, you better not have &^@#ed up hansen's trade. How does this trade have anything to do with a Hansen trade? I don't get people. You hear a rumor and that's where X player is going for sure. Did it ever make sense to you at all that maybe MIN was focusing on Hanzal all along and maybe Hansen could have been an plan B, C, D or even further down the line? No instead lets' criticize the Canucks and management for F'ing up. No loyalty, no trust, no belief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 6 minutes ago, CRAZY_4_NAZZY said: Agreed, feel like this only has driven up the price for the UFA rentals...however because of Hansen's extra year term, might detract teams of paying high for fear of loss at the expansion draft. If anything if a team trades for him. Hansen is likely just a rental for them. Hanzal is a rental too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 3 minutes ago, apollo said: Hey leave Jim alone. He doesn't work on weekends. If I was gm of this team I'm sure I'd put in much more hours than Jimbo. Trading for the sake of trading is not a solid plan though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbyg43 Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 1 minute ago, hatedkid666 said: Thats a filthy lineup. Maybe is we retained salary on Hansen and took on a contract? idk, unlikely but just thinking of possible ways If you want one of there prized prospects creativity has to be key word (our former GM would have created some wizardry) I will only hold out hope for 24 hours more as iron is hot now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerry35 Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 That looks like a pretty good haul for Arizona. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luongotv Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 I think people forget that the Canucks don't have to trade Hansen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithers joe Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 i wish people on here, instead of complaining about no trades, would give us an update on what teams were interested in our players and what they offered for them. then we could properly judge if benning has failed. that would be a post i would want to read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.