qwijibo Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 1 minute ago, darkpoet said: I just checked. We own his rights until July 1, 2022. His contract in the KHL is up in 2021. In order to buyout, the remaining 2/3rds of the contract need to be paid - however long that is. So the closer to the end of the contract, the less $ that will be. I know he said that in the summer but things can change in a hurry... just ask Colorado.... Skyy@CanuckSyko Replying to @vorkywh24 @tryamkin94 What are the out clauses? Что из этого следует? vorky@vorkywh24 Dont know if there are out clauses. If no out clause, a player can buyout his contract when pays 2/3 of the rest of contract to his team. 12:04 AM - May 1, 2017 Pretty much what I just said. Lol. There’s always a possibility. But it would cost him personally to buy out his contract. And as of this Summer he said that wasn’t an avenue he’d be willing to pursue. I’d think if it were to happen it would be after next season when the buyout is for only 1 contract year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 1 hour ago, The 5th Line said: Pretty scared to think what JB might be willing to pay EG Yeah..you know JB is a good drafter. Decent trader. He can't sign worth $&!# though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 Anything over 4M is an overpayment for Gudbranson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apples Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 I just hope the Sedins stays for cheap contracts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 1 hour ago, Silky mitts said: Anything over 4 would be a brutal mistake Prepared to be disappointed then. If he isn't a Canuck, he'll be making over 4 anywhere. And if the Canucks move him, then their shallow d-depth just got a whole lot shallower. I'm thinking the starting point is at least Karl Alzner money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 16 minutes ago, qwijibo said: Pretty much what I just said. Lol. There’s always a possibility. But it would cost him personally to buy out his contract. And as of this Summer he said that wasn’t an avenue he’d be willing to pursue. I’d think if it were to happen it would be after next season when the buyout is for only 1 contract year. There is also some hinky stuff with the KHL that could come into play. They intend on contracting several teams and dramatically lowering the salary cap. Larionov said that Tryamkin was given a bigger contract there than he was offered here... so that would be something that would likely be terminated if they had to shave salary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 13 minutes ago, 73 Percent said: Yeah..you know JB is a good drafter. Decent trader. He can't sign worth $&!# though. its improving. Baer, Granny, Vanek, del Z, Wiercoich, Nilsson are all solid deals. Even Gagner is bearable. Bo's is a great deal for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlwaysACanuckFan Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solinar Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 Hmm, we're waiting until just now to drop the news we're trying to re-sign Gudbranson, and we're still waiting on the Sedins... Great, just f'ing great. This seems like something that should be done in house, and awhile ago, but I guess that's hard when you haven't even signed your GM beyond this season and can't figure out what to do there either. At least it seems like the $&!# show goes from top down.... Sign the sedins now to a 1 year extension, 3.5 for each with a million dollar bonus in there for hitting over 50 pts. Sign Gudbranson to a 2 year contract worth 3.5 and 3.75 with bonus attached for getting above 20 pts. That way Guddy can bring all of his intangibles, and if he hits 2nd pairing point totals, he can make his 4.5 to 4.75 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R.Dahlin26 Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 If they resign Guddy and Vanek and end up doing nothing at the Trade Deadline good luck getting an extension Jim. Fans are really looking forward to the deadline and expect moves to advance the Rebuild. They only have 6 picks heading into the 2018 draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silky mitts Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 18 minutes ago, Wilbur said: Prepared to be disappointed then. If he isn't a Canuck, he'll be making over 4 anywhere. And if the Canucks move him, then their shallow d-depth just got a whole lot shallower. I'm thinking the starting point is at least Karl Alzner money. He should be moved then he isn’t worth what he’ll command Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flickyoursedin Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 7 minutes ago, R.Dahlin26 said: If they resign Guddy and Vanek and end up doing nothing at the Trade Deadline good luck getting an extension Jim. Fans are really looking forward to the deadline and expect moves to advance the Rebuild. They only have 6 picks heading into the 2018 draft. This exactly! So we’re going into a bottom 3 finish and we’re talking about extending our two biggest trade pieces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 2 hours ago, The 5th Line said: Pretty scared to think what JB might be willing to pay EG Guddy is a big heavy hitter, and fighter, who can play. These guys a rare. We should resign him. I say it’s a five year term for 22.5 million. We are a powderpuff team. We need what Guddy can bring. It’s his best skill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naslundfan921 Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 Publicly it would be wise to state that you are trying to resign him because if not other teams know that you will be willing to move him for a minimal return just to get something back. So in terms of his trade value, I think stating that is just a good PR move. That being said I wouldn't be opposed to keeping him for the right price. Pretty much everyone in our top 6 with the exception of Stetcher and Pouliot are candidates to be moved, either now or at the draft. Holm should get a look at the NHL level so it's more a matter of who moves at the deadline. I'm in favor of moving whoever nets us another 1st (without taking back long term salary) so that would probably be Tanev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 6 minutes ago, naslundfan921 said: Publicly it would be wise to state that you are trying to resign him because if not other teams know that you will be willing to move him for a minimal return just to get something back. So in terms of his trade value, I think stating that is just a good PR move. That being said I wouldn't be opposed to keeping him for the right price. Pretty much everyone in our top 6 with the exception of Stetcher and Pouliot are candidates to be moved, either now or at the draft. Holm should get a look at the NHL level so it's more a matter of who moves at the deadline. I'm in favor of moving whoever nets us another 1st (without taking back long term salary) so that would probably be Tanev. Nice post. Well thought out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 Wow Hutton is making 2.8 M per Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 3 hours ago, CRAZY_4_NAZZY said: As it should be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
komodo0921 Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 2 hours ago, Hairy Kneel said: Gud 4 year @ 5.5 I'm good with the term, but I wouldn't offer him more than Tanev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIC_CITY Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 3 hours ago, Yotes said: TO be honest he has be so injured I dont think Guddy has much leverage to ask for some sort of absurd contract. The 1 dimensional shutdown physical D are still relevant in the NHL but they arent going to cash in like Bogosian did imo. Guddy @ 4yr 16m is more than fair. He can be on the 2nd pair until a different RHD drops him out of that role. And with our depth I dont see that happening anytime soon. Just need Big E to stay healthy for us! Exactly. He just hasn't played enough hockey the last 2 years to have the kind of leverage he would like going into free agency. 4 x 4 would probably be something to seriously consider. To be honest, 4 x 4 would be a little unheard of for someone in Gudbranson's position. He MIGHT be able to get a bit more in free agency but Benning and company would also be taking on a fair bit of risk signing him to a 4 year deal. I'm ok either way. I would like his toughness in our lineup if the contract made sense. I would also like to trade him if he brought back a big time future asset. Benning needs to make one of these things happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6string Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 If you are gonna overpay as many clubs do, make it a short term deal. This keeps at trade option a little more attractive for teams interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.