Scottish⑦Canuck Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 The term is too long but everyone is getting it today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post ShakyWalton Posted July 1, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted July 1, 2016 Who is that a-hole sittng between Ferraro and McGuire..he is a big Canuck hater. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post oldnews Posted July 1, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted July 1, 2016 Pair of idiots on the TSN panel - at least there's one troll stomper there, attempting to make sense to some hard heads. Jeff O'Neill - one of the dimmest bulbs in the business. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drakrami Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 6mil 6 years is too much. For 6 years, we shoulda got him for 5mil..... Hell, Ladd got 5.5mil only 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Monahan Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 1 minute ago, riffraff said: Cue the pompoms. too much and too long. Weren't you advocating for signing Lucic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Well done, Benning. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FijianCanuck Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Benning and his bruins connection. Hope it works better than Bartkowski. Solid pick up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaxVerstappen33 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 1 minute ago, riffraff said: Cue the pompoms. too much and too long. No its not. Look what the other guys signed for. Lucic added just enough years to hurt. Ladd added just enough money to hurt. We didnt over pay a dime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Just now, LolClarkson said: Not for a Daniel Alfredsson type of player. IQ doesn't age Would have preferred 4. Hopefully he didn't land at NTC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 2 minutes ago, cdubuya said: i do understand giving him 6 years was a condition of him signing. Doesn't automatically make it a good move just because we need offensive help. Maybe we would be better off signing someone else to a shorter term deal. By that logic, then all you get are leftovers and bit players and other teams pass you. There's paying to market and paying past market. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSnipeshow91 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 I love it! People complain about the 6 years but Loui Eriksson is one of those players that can play well into their 30's and still put up 50+ points. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHYCHRUN Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 The Canucks are getting blasted. Nobody can figure out what direction they are going in. Ray "they have 2 feet going down different roads" "They want to get younger, they sign Loui... The want to build through the draft... they trade away draft picks." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Just now, ShakyWalton said: Who is that a-hole sittng between Ferraro and McGuire..he is a big Canuck hater. That's Jeff O'Neill - he's not particularly bright. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WonderTwinPowers Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 If he was going to sign for less than 6 year's it would have been in Boston. Quit the sobbing over the term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaxVerstappen33 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Just now, Gooseberries said: Would have preferred 4. Hopefully he didn't land at NTC He would have signed elsewhere then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darius Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Just now, ShakyWalton said: Who is that a-hole sittng between Ferraro and McGuire..he is a big Canuck hater. Yeah, hes a clown. Maybe the Canucks should follow the edmonton model and suck for a decade. He probably thinks thats the better plan. Nothing wrong with keeping vets around and trying to win every year. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobi Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 A bit too long for my liking. Does it have a NMC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya Mikheyev Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Just now, Gooseberries said: Would have preferred 4. Hopefully he didn't land at NTC Lol. Canucks aren't a president-cup-winning-SCF-appearing team right now. There's no way to entice a player of Eriksson's ability except for with term. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derr12 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Good signing, we needed this guy. This and another middle 6 guy and we push for a playoff spot imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Naslund Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 2 minutes ago, Drakrami said: 6mil 6 years is too much. For 6 years, we shoulda got him for 5mil..... Hell, Ladd got 5.5mil only Yeah Ladd did.....but Ladd isn't the player Eriksson is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts