KKnight Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 I really feel Montreal might be a decent fit for Loui. Im proposing: Van: Alzner Mon: Loui + mid range prospect or pick. You could argue alzner has lower value than loui. Loui still nearly put up 30 points. Alzner is a bc boy in a tough spot of his career, maybe he gets re-inspired being within his hometown organization. We save money and they get a more useful player for some additional money, but shed Alzner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 (edited) 5 hours ago, KKnight said: I really feel Montreal might be a decent fit for Loui. Im proposing: Van: Alzner Mon: Loui + mid range prospect or pick. You could argue alzner has lower value than loui. Loui still nearly put up 30 points. Alzner is a bc boy in a tough spot of his career, maybe he gets re-inspired being within his hometown organization. We save money and they get a more useful player for some additional money, but shed Alzner. The thing is. Where does Eriksson fit into Montreal’s lineup? Certainly not the top 6. I’m not even sure he’d be top 9. Montreal is strong on left wing. (Drouin , Tatar, Byron, Lehkonen). Less so on the right. Bergevin is in record saying you can never have too many defencemen. I think they’re content to have him sitting in the minors as insurance against injuries. $3.5m against the cap with him in the minors is better than $6m against the cap for a 4th line player. Edited July 12, 2019 by qwijibo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBatch Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 For those that haven’t read the article NHL.com reports LE and Benning finally talked, two months after the remarks were made. Both sides are looking for a solution which could include a trade, but it would have to be for another player on a bad contract coming back the other way so the OPs and several other equally lopsided deals just won’t be happening. They have/are looking at every team to see what could be done...Benning also said he thinks he’s got value for us as a two-way forward and PKer etc (which of course he’s going to say), I also don’t think he’d take on a worse contract given our cap space is tight so 6 million cap hit is about or less would have to be coming back, or take on a contract with longer term. As it sits now he’s buried even further in the depth chart so don’t see how LE is going to get out of this without playing the best hockey he has since coming here. Really don’t think they will find any takers ... it’s possible (Lucic is the most realistic proposal so far, but we’d be getting the worse contract and the worse player other then tougher). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCE Posted July 12, 2019 Share Posted July 12, 2019 Im looking at Ottawa To Sens Eriksson & Baertschi To Van Anderson & 2nd rd in 2020 or 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chickenspear Posted July 13, 2019 Share Posted July 13, 2019 10 hours ago, IBatch said: For those that haven’t read the article NHL.com reports LE and Benning finally talked, two months after the remarks were made. Both sides are looking for a solution which could include a trade, but it would have to be for another player on a bad contract coming back the other way so the OPs and several other equally lopsided deals just won’t be happening. They have/are looking at every team to see what could be done...Benning also said he thinks he’s got value for us as a two-way forward and PKer etc (which of course he’s going to say), I also don’t think he’d take on a worse contract given our cap space is tight so 6 million cap hit is about or less would have to be coming back, or take on a contract with longer term. As it sits now he’s buried even further in the depth chart so don’t see how LE is going to get out of this without playing the best hockey he has since coming here. Really don’t think they will find any takers ... it’s possible (Lucic is the most realistic proposal so far, but we’d be getting the worse contract and the worse player other then tougher). Someone should get loui to check out this forum. Might persuade him to terminate his contract! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
18W-40C-6W Posted July 13, 2019 Share Posted July 13, 2019 14 hours ago, IBatch said: For those that haven’t read the article NHL.com reports LE and Benning finally talked, two months after the remarks were made. Both sides are looking for a solution which could include a trade, but it would have to be for another player on a bad contract coming back the other way so the OPs and several other equally lopsided deals just won’t be happening. They have/are looking at every team to see what could be done...Benning also said he thinks he’s got value for us as a two-way forward and PKer etc (which of course he’s going to say), I also don’t think he’d take on a worse contract given our cap space is tight so 6 million cap hit is about or less would have to be coming back, or take on a contract with longer term. As it sits now he’s buried even further in the depth chart so don’t see how LE is going to get out of this without playing the best hockey he has since coming here. Really don’t think they will find any takers ... it’s possible (Lucic is the most realistic proposal so far, but we’d be getting the worse contract and the worse player other then tougher). I really see three alternatives, you’ve listed or implied two. 1. He stays and plays well, ups his value and someone in need of depth says ok once all teams know their cap situations. Any team who’s not trying to reach the cap floor will wait till their roster is set to make a deal for a guy with a 6 mil cap hit. 2. A team that needs to hit the cap floor (ie Ottawa) and is happy to pay someone 3 mil to get 6 mil of cap hit. 3. Take back equally bad cap hit but that doesn’t help us and in that case you may as well keep him as a depth guy, PKer, utility player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted July 13, 2019 Share Posted July 13, 2019 Realistically this is a cap dump and the only teams that have big cap space are: Ottawa New Jersey (will soon have big ELCs to replace) Columbus Philadelphia (not counting them because they've got a lot of new big contracts to dish out) Colorado Winnipeg LA Based on those teams, I'm sure we could just throw him to one of the many teams who need a 3rd or 4th liner for a late round pick. He still does have some value and isn't purely negative (ie. Cost us a pick and only get "future considerations"), I honestly think he might fetch us a 4th rounder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetliner Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 erikson goldobin 5th rounder for an AHLer and 7th round pick Any team. please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTramFan Posted July 15, 2019 Share Posted July 15, 2019 (edited) New Jersey have cap space of almost $20m. They have 11 forwards under contract and will likely add RFA Zacha to make it 12. They have two plugs in Rooney and Hayden that are taking up roster spots and costing salary while contributing very little. Ideally they could replace them with a bottom 6 veteran with strong PK skills, and a dynamic 2LW to play with Hischier. To NJD: Eriksson (25% retained and after 2019 signing bonus) Baertschi (after 2019 signing bonus) 4th round 2020 pick To VAN: Rooney Hayden Hall - Hughes - Palmieri Baer - Hischier - Simmonds Eriksson - Zajac - Coleman Wood - Zacha - Anderson This adds $6.4m to NJD cap but a net salary cost of only $3m in 2019. Then $5.4m in 2020. In 2021 when Baer contract ends cap hit drops to $4.5m with only $3m in salary. Most importantly it improves their roster significantly. VAN can waive or buyout Hayden + Rooney bringing total cap savings to about $7.5m. Edited July 15, 2019 by BigTramFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted July 15, 2019 Share Posted July 15, 2019 (edited) 6 hours ago, BigTramFan said: New Jersey have cap space of almost $20m. They have 11 forwards under contract and will likely add RFA Zacha to make it 12. They have two plugs in Rooney and Hayden that are taking up roster spots and costing salary while contributing very little. Ideally they could replace them with a bottom 6 veteran with strong PK skills, and a dynamic 2LW to play with Hischier. To NJD: Eriksson (25% retained and after 2019 signing bonus) Baertschi (after 2019 signing bonus) 4th round 2020 pick To VAN: Rooney Hayden Hall - Hughes - Palmieri Baer - Hischier - Simmonds Eriksson - Zajac - Coleman Wood - Zacha - Anderson This adds $6.4m to NJD cap but a net salary cost of only $3m in 2019. Then $5.4m in 2020. In 2021 when Baer contract ends cap hit drops to $4.5m with only $3m in salary. Most importantly it improves their roster significantly. VAN can waive or buyout Hayden + Rooney bringing total cap savings to about $7.5m. Per Jimmy Murphy NJD is talking with Boston about David Backes. 6M cap hit for 2 years and an average salary of 2.5M. They are asking for a 1st round pick. NJD will need the cap space in a year - Hischier and a few others like Vatanen, Blackwood contracts are up and they will do all their possible to keep Taylor Hall. The NY Post even predicts a contract of over 12M for Hall. Edited July 15, 2019 by mll 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hindustan Smyl Posted July 15, 2019 Share Posted July 15, 2019 Canucks are better off NOT moving Eriksson this season: Unless of course, they can move Eriksson without retention to another team, and not have to throw in a sweetener. Unfortunately, I don’t think this will be possible. Obviously, it wouldn’t be very good asset management if we moved Eriksson with a “sweetener” like Virtanen or Gaudette. So here is what I suggest: 1) Hold onto Eriksson for this season and keep him on the main roster. Give him a shot to increase his value. Eriksson will likely be motivated AF as well since a failure to play with fire this year could likely make him Utica bound next season. 2) Move Eriksson NEXT season after July 1st 2020. Eriksson will still be difficult to move, but it will be a much easier task for the following reasons: A). He will only be owed 5 million dollars in real money after this season. B-). He will only have two years left on his contract. 3) Move Baertschi this season: Move Baertschi to the Devils for a 5th round pick. The Devils are in the market for a LW’er if I understand correctly. They want someone to rub balls so to speak with Hischier. 4) Schaller to Ottawa for a 7th. End result = 5.2ish million cleared cap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted July 15, 2019 Share Posted July 15, 2019 46 minutes ago, Hindustan Smyl said: 1) Hold onto Eriksson for this season and keep him on the main roster. Give him a shot to increase his value. He's had three full seasons to prove his value and has done squat. What, realistically, will motivate him any more this season than previously? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hindustan Smyl Posted July 15, 2019 Share Posted July 15, 2019 5 minutes ago, Fanuck said: He's had three full seasons to prove his value and has done squat. What, realistically, will motivate him any more this season than previously? True. The only real difference in those other three seasons is that he likely didn’t feel much pressure (ie our team sucked and he couldn’t fathom the idea of him being sent down or even risk losing an NHL job). He won’t have that same peace of mind this year however. Our team is starting to get slightly competitive and we’d have absolutely no qualms or hesitations in scratching him or sending him down. Maybe I’m wrong, but I think we could definitely see a more desperate Loui Eriksson this season. If Eriksson plays well, he could increase his value and he could resume his career on another NHL club. LE has personal incentive here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted July 15, 2019 Share Posted July 15, 2019 Get over it. Nobody wants Eriksson. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 15, 2019 Share Posted July 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, Hairy Kneel said: Get over it. Nobody wants Eriksson. Which is exactly why Loui either retires, or suffers the embarrassment of playing in the minors. He retires. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklehead44 Posted July 15, 2019 Share Posted July 15, 2019 (edited) To Dallas Eriksson @ 50% retained 2nd round pick 4th round pickTo Vancouver Comeau 3rd round pick - With third line expectations at 3 million per year he could be welcomed back with open arms (not too unlike how Linden was when we traded for him) - Canucks get rid of the third year of Eriksson's contract - The reason this deal is expensive is because Comeau's contract is still relatively cheap and only for two years ---To Ottawa Eriksson 6th round pick To Vancouver Ryan $2.25M Retained - Ottawa saves $5.25M cash - Van saves 1 million per year cap space - Change of scenery (same length contracts) ---To Minnesota Loui Eriksson 2nd round pick 4th round pickTo Vancouver Victor Rask 3rd round pick - Minnesota saves $3M cash - Van saves $2M / year cap space - Minnesota gets the more productive player, but Victor Rask is still young at 26 and could turn things around - Opens up Vancouver moving Sutter ---To Columbus Loui Eriksson Brandon Sutter @50% retained 2nd round pickTo Vancouver Alexander Wennberg - Wennberg is earning 4.9M and came off of a two goal season - In three years Canucks save $1.1M and likely have a useful player on the roster in Wennberg - Wennberg's contract runs for four seasons - that fourth season is when Seth Jones becomes a free agent (Eriksson and Sutter off the books) Edited July 15, 2019 by canucklehead44 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCE Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 Looking at Ottawa they have 3 goalies, not like we need another goalie but To Ottawa Eriksson To Van Condon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTramFan Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 15 hours ago, mll said: Per Jimmy Murphy NJD is talking with Boston about David Backes. 6M cap hit for 2 years and an average salary of 2.5M. They are asking for a 1st round pick. NJD will need the cap space in a year - Hischier and a few others like Vatanen, Blackwood contracts are up and they will do all their possible to keep Taylor Hall. The NY Post even predicts a contract of over 12M for Hall. All very good points. But... NJD could make the proposed deal and improve their roster now. And even if they take on Eriksson and Baer they are projected to have about $30m in cap space next season to resign Hall, Hischier, Vatanen and Blackwood. I also think that improving their roster PRIOR to resigning Hall will help to convince him to stay with NJD when he reaches free agency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hindustan Smyl Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 (edited) 11 hours ago, Alflives said: Which is exactly why Loui either retires, or suffers the embarrassment of playing in the minors. He retires. I think he’d seriously consider retirement after July 1st 2020 (31 of 36 million will have been paid to him). I don’t see it happening this year however. Edited July 16, 2019 by Hindustan Smyl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 4 hours ago, Hindustan Smyl said: I think he’d seriously consider retirement after July 1st 2020 (31 of 36 million will have been paid to him). I don’t see it happening this year however. I guess it depends on how much his reputation is worth to him. He’s made a lot of money. I don’t see Loui riding buses in the AHL. He’ll retire before being waived. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now