Gurn Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 3 minutes ago, Boudrias said: Yes they could but if the incidence is higher whether recognized or not it would drive the negative stats down. People are freezing out over the death rate but that number could be exaggerated by unaccounted cases. One can only go by the numbers that are posted. The problem is there are known, unknowns and then there are unknown, unknowns. Until the actual numbers of infected are known, we can only use the known numbers that are known. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 30 minutes ago, gurn said: One can only go by the numbers that are posted. The problem is there are known, unknowns and then there are unknown, unknowns. Until the actual numbers of infected are known, we can only use the known numbers that are known. add to that differences in environmental and health factors between countries. And age-related factors. Just wash your damn hands and try not to touch your face in public. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 I know I shouldn't make light, but our Physics prof, who originally from Iran, called in sick today.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanukfanatic Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 (edited) It would be weird watching the NHL games with no people in the stands. Kinda like watching a Belarus WJC game I guess... https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-impacted-by-potential-preseason-games-china-coronavirus/c-315578596 https://www.inquirer.com/sports/coronavirus-march-madness-ncaa-nba-nhl-olympics-20200302.html Edited March 3, 2020 by Kanukfanatic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 3/03/2020 @ 10 CET 73 countries, 90893 cases, 3111 dead https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/685d0ace521648f8a5beeeee1b9125cd WHO link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruilin96 Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 3 hours ago, Kanukfanatic said: It would be weird watching the NHL games with no people in the stands. Kinda like watching a Belarus WJC game I guess... https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-impacted-by-potential-preseason-games-china-coronavirus/c-315578596 https://www.inquirer.com/sports/coronavirus-march-madness-ncaa-nba-nhl-olympics-20200302.html The owners would rather post-pone the season than having no spectators. What's the point of these games for the owners if they don't make money? I can see the league potentially postpone the season for 2-4 weeks before resume playing. This allow people who are infected to reach their incubation period and be quarantined from going out in public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russ Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 2 hours ago, ruilin96 said: The owners would rather post-pone the season than having no spectators. What's the point of these games for the owners if they don't make money? I can see the league potentially postpone the season for 2-4 weeks before resume playing. This allow people who are infected to reach their incubation period and be quarantined from going out in public. TV revenue will still be paid out for those games. They are already doing no crowd soccer games in europe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuckin_futz Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 (edited) Washington state reports two additional virus deaths and seven more cases Tue 3 Mar 2020 19:32:26 GMT That brings the US tally to 8 If you want to do some back-of-the-envelop calculations. If you assume the mortality rate is 0.2%-2.0% that implies 400-4000 full-blown cases, with many more incubating or worsening. That's extrapolating from a tiny sample but Italy went from 6 to 600 cases in a week. Meanwhile, Spain has reported its first virus death, saying it was way back on Feb 13. We don't know much about the patient but that's three weeks of potential spread, which is far too much to contain. The rest of the list looks like this .............. Singapore 110 0 United States 103 6 Hong Kong 100 2 Kuwait 56 0 United Kingdom 51 0 Bahrain 47 0 Thailand 43 1 Taiwan 42 1 Switzerland 42 0 Malaysia 36 0 Australia 33 1 Canada 27 0 Norway 25 0 Sweden 24 0 Iraq 21 0 United Arab Emirates 21 0 Austria 18 0 Netherlands 18 0 Vietnam 16 0 Oman 12 0 Macau 10 0 Israel 10 0 Lebanon 10 0 Belgium 8 0 Croatia 7 0 Greece 7 0 Ecuador 6 0 Finland 6 0 India 6 0 Russia 6 0 Algeria 5 0 Czech Republic 5 0 Mexico 5 0 Pakistan 5 0 Denmark 4 0 Philippines 3 1 Azerbaijan 3 0 Georgia 3 0 Iceland 3 0 Qatar 3 0 Romania 3 0 Belarus 2 0 Brazil 2 0 Egypt 2 0 Indonesia 2 0 Portugal 2 0 Afghanistan 1 0 Andorra 1 0 Armenia 1 0 Cambodia 1 0 Dominican Republic 1 0 Estonia 1 0 Ireland 1 0 Jordan 1 0 Lithuania 1 0 Luxembourg 1 0 Monaco 1 0 Morocco 1 0 Nepal 1 0 New Zealand 1 0 Nigeria 1 0 North Macedonia 1 0 San Marino 1 0 Saudi Arabia 1 0 Senegal 1 0 Sri Lanka 1 0 Tunisia 1 0 Ukraine 1 0 Edited March 3, 2020 by nuckin_futz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 (edited) There's been a fair amount of debate on whether the American healthcare system is superior to Canada's on these boards. This story suggests otherwise: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/health-care/article240476806.html I think it's fairly obvious that stories like this one could easily frighten people away from getting tested for COVID-19. I also think it's fairly obvious that this could present a rather large problem.... EDIT: (Formatting was a mess, so just posting the link) Edited March 3, 2020 by RUPERTKBD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppleJack Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 On 3/2/2020 at 8:27 AM, falcon45ca said: 2.5% mortality rate observed over 77,000 cases, majority with underlying health concerns. Hey Chicken Little, how's the sky doin' today? Some of us actually have underlying health concerns ... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 48 minutes ago, AppleJack said: Some of us actually have underlying health concerns ... Or small children....or elderly relatives....but hey, no big deal if you're a healthy 20 - something, amirite? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruilin96 Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Be cautious of it, but do not fear it. Wash your hands, keep good hygiene practice. Find ways to improve your immune system (e.g. vitamins, workouts etc.). Still enjoy and live your life as you normally do and hope for the best. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanukfanatic Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 8 hours ago, ruilin96 said: The owners would rather post-pone the season than having no spectators. What's the point of these games for the owners if they don't make money? I can see the league potentially postpone the season for 2-4 weeks before resume playing. This allow people who are infected to reach their incubation period and be quarantined from going out in public. This type of virus makes the rounds for closer to a year than 2-4 weeks. I don't think a postponement is a possibility. Probably either play games with no fans or cancel imo. But who knows for sure.... ...some people are stocking up on food and meds. I am gonna stock up on booze!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Formatting problem so here is a bit of the story and link https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/real-people-wont-die-rhetoric-around-who-is-at-risk-of-coronavirus-infection-sparks-debate-over-ageism-ableism/ar-BB10HotE?ocid=spartandhp " As heightened fear of the coronavirus continues to spread while more global cases develop, people are reassuring themselves and others that the virus is mostly only deadly for a select few vulnerable groups — the elderly, the immunocompromised and those with pre-existing health conditions. But the reminder has sparked a conversation about ageism and ableism when it comes to health emergencies. In the World Health Organization’s recently released Q&A about COVID-19, the agency wrote that “older persons and persons with pre-existing medical conditions (such as high blood pressure, heart disease, or diabetes) appear to develop serious illness more often than others.” Some social media users, however, have taken this to mean that they don’t need to worry because it’s only these vulnerable populations who are at severe risk. On Feb. 26, Twitter user @ahleuwu wrote, “(F)alse alarm everybody turns out the coronavirus only kills old people,” sharing a photo of statistics showing the death rate percentages among different age groups." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefCon1 Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 On 3/2/2020 at 3:23 PM, RUPERTKBD said: I know I shouldn't make light, but our Physics prof, who originally from Iran, called in sick today.... As long as he didnt go to Iran recently, I dont see what the fuss would be about. Its probably just a common cold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefCon1 Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 1 hour ago, gurn said: Formatting problem so here is a bit of the story and link https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/real-people-wont-die-rhetoric-around-who-is-at-risk-of-coronavirus-infection-sparks-debate-over-ageism-ableism/ar-BB10HotE?ocid=spartandhp " As heightened fear of the coronavirus continues to spread while more global cases develop, people are reassuring themselves and others that the virus is mostly only deadly for a select few vulnerable groups — the elderly, the immunocompromised and those with pre-existing health conditions. But the reminder has sparked a conversation about ageism and ableism when it comes to health emergencies. In the World Health Organization’s recently released Q&A about COVID-19, the agency wrote that “older persons and persons with pre-existing medical conditions (such as high blood pressure, heart disease, or diabetes) appear to develop serious illness more often than others.” Some social media users, however, have taken this to mean that they don’t need to worry because it’s only these vulnerable populations who are at severe risk. On Feb. 26, Twitter user @ahleuwu wrote, “(F)alse alarm everybody turns out the coronavirus only kills old people,” sharing a photo of statistics showing the death rate percentages among different age groups." I would say people that are immunocompromised or elderly due to weaker immune system are mainly affected. This virus gets killed by our immune system and we only have that to combat this virus. I dont think a diabetic patient thats taking medication or in other words under control would be affected unless they have uncontrolled diabetes or uncontrolled hypertension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 1 minute ago, DefCon1 said: As long as he didnt go to Iran recently, I dont see what the fuss would be about. Its probably just a common cold It was said tongue in cheek... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefCon1 Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 4 hours ago, AppleJack said: Some of us actually have underlying health concerns ... If you had it checked or taking meds for it, you should be fine unless its something major like cardiovascular disease or you are taking meds as transplant patient. Any meds that can weaken your immune system would be a major concern. Really depends what is your underlying health issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falcon45ca Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 3 hours ago, RUPERTKBD said: Or small children....or elderly relatives....but hey, no big deal if you're a healthy 20 - something, amirite? This is a blatant mischaracterization of what people who are advocating against doomsday, the end is nigh rhetoric are saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefCon1 Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 (edited) 9 minutes ago, RUPERTKBD said: It was said tongue in cheek... I know but at this point the disease is becoming Pandemic, already in 70 countries. Now I doubt people will be targeting 70 nationalites lol. Look at South Korea, Japan, Italy and China. I heard this will keep getting worst and China has decreased their daily cases only because of tough restriction on movement of people in the cities. If they remove those restrictions, their will be a spike again for the confirmed cases in China. I heard an expert talk about this, so am just summarising what was said. Edited March 4, 2020 by DefCon1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now