Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

complete rebuild? what team would you trade our entire roster for?

Rate this topic


grouse747

Recommended Posts

I see a suggestion we may need a complete rebuild... or better argument, we should have done one in recent years. I certainly agree with this. but sedins/potential revenue hit probably got in the way.

 

but given we have EP, QH, JTM, BH, BB and TDemko, how many teams would you exchange that core for?....... I'm thinking that's better core talent than many of the teams in the league.... definitely a massive drop-off after those 6 players. but I presume that's the case with most teams. whether it's 3 players or 8 players.

 

and then partial 2nd line/defense pair and 3rd/4th comes down to spending money wisely, drafting non-first round well and creating great chemistry/fundamental defensive play?.... 

 

would people give up all our current players for a chance to do what Seattle is doing next year?...... is Seattle getting the same terms as Las Vegas?..... surely, LV success was partially a one-time event. can't expect a repeat. and I agree with Ray Ferraro. didn't hear one person say "omg, with the expansion draft etc./etc., LV is going to be really good". it was ALL HINDSIGHT (at least to me)

 

we should definitely think of moving a good forward for a good defensemen..... but I think franchise defensemen are more valuable than forwards (maybe not true at very very high end) and eat up minutes like crazy in big games.
 

thanks for any feedback :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A complete rebuild would mean new GM and they bring in a coach (Hopefully not Gallant). 

This is probably not the year to do a complete rebuild. Don't see any generational players on this years draft. 

Unless you think Owen Power will be Ekblad v2.0.

Even PLD in new surroundings in Winnipeg is doing better but not earth shaking. 

Laffy with the Rangers isn't even doing that hot. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't need a complete rebuild, there are some great pieces in place.

 

We just need a shrewd GM that has the ability to construct a proper modern day team instead of a guy who gets more excited about free-agency than a kid hearing the ice cream truck coming down the street.

  • Thanks 1
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tampa, Colorado (probably the only two teams without bad contracts -- I'd argue that the likes of Tyler and Erik Johnson aren't "bad-bad", just the result of Covid cap issues and wouldn't have been much of an issue in regular years).
Also Carolina (good roster and love their Storm Surge) and the Islanders (solid core with Barzal, solid hardworking group and their structure turns every goalie into a star, plus Barry Trotz's system brings out the best of their roster).  

Edited by Phil_314
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spoiler

 

1 hour ago, grouse747 said:

I see a suggestion we may need a complete rebuild... or better argument, we should have done one in recent years. I certainly agree with this. but sedins/potential revenue hit probably got in the way.

 

but given we have EP, QH, JTM, BH, BB and TDemko, how many teams would you exchange that core for?....... I'm thinking that's better core talent than many of the teams in the league.... definitely a massive drop-off after those 6 players. but I presume that's the case with most teams. whether it's 3 players or 8 players.

 

and then partial 2nd line/defense pair and 3rd/4th comes down to spending money wisely, drafting non-first round well and creating great chemistry/fundamental defensive play?.... 

 

would people give up all our current players for a chance to do what Seattle is doing next year?...... is Seattle getting the same terms as Las Vegas?..... surely, LV success was partially a one-time event. can't expect a repeat. and I agree with Ray Ferraro. didn't hear one person say "omg, with the expansion draft etc./etc., LV is going to be really good". it was ALL HINDSIGHT (at least to me)

 

we should definitely think of moving a good forward for a good defensemen..... but I think franchise defensemen are more valuable than forwards (maybe not true at very very high end) and eat up minutes like crazy in big games.
 

thanks for any feedback :)

why would it be any different for seattle? You select the player that is of most value in a trade, even if your roster is over the cap the demand for other teams to aquire a quality player will be in seattle's hands. they will select 15  Defenceman many of which will be top 4. 8  top 9 centers and 6 top 6 forwards and 3 goalies. they also get a 48 hour window for first shot at UFA'S if they can come to a agreement they can select them. every time a top 4 is available they will attempt to select them, I bet many teams will try to convince them otherwise.

If these players aren't signed they get first shot and 48 hours to sign them.

Spoiler
PLAYER TEAM AGE POS HANDED GP G A P P/GP +/- Sh Sh% TOI W L SO GAA Sv% CLAUSE EXPIRY CAP HIT SALARY
Colorado AvalancheCOL 28 LW, C Left 30 11 18 29 0.97 8 89 0.12 19:50 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $5,571,429 $6,500,000
Washington CapitalsWSH 35 LW, RW Right 28 15 12 27 0.96 -2 114 0.13 20:29 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $9,538,462 $10,000,000
Edmonton OilersEDM 29 RD Right 34 4 26 30 0.88 7 98 0.04 21:52 - - - - -   UFA $3,750,000 $3,750,000
Carolina HurricanesCAR 28 RD Right 32 3 23 26 0.81 9 100 0.03 22:37 - - - - -   UFA $5,750,000 $6,000,000
Edmonton OilersEDM 28 C, LW Left 34 11 15 26 0.76 1 100 0.11 21:18 - - - - -   UFA $6,000,000 $6,000,000
Boston BruinsBOS 35 C Right 25 1 16 17 0.68 2 37 0.03 17:03 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $7,250,000 $7,000,000
Toronto Maple LeafsTOR 29 LW, RW Right 31 11 10 21 0.68 13 82 0.13 19:30 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $2,250,000 $2,500,000
Los Angeles KingsLAK 27 LW, C Left 31 8 13 21 0.68 0 71 0.11 20:02 - - - - -   UFA $2,425,000 $2,450,000
Montreal CanadiensMTL 30 LW, RW Left 30 6 14 20 0.67 6 54 0.11 14:51 - - - - -   UFA $5,300,000 $4,200,000
St. Louis BluesSTL 31 RW, LW Left 32 8 12 20 0.63 7 71 0.11 15:26 - - - - -   UFA $4,000,000 $4,000,000
Colorado AvalancheCOL 28 RW, LW Left 31 10 9 19 0.61 0 46 0.22 14:24 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $6,000,000 $6,500,000
St. Louis BluesSTL 29 LW Left 18 2 9 11 0.61 8 34 0.06 18:42 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $5,350,000 $4,000,000
Winnipeg JetsWPG 35 C Left 33 10 10 20 0.61 4 55 0.18 18:02 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $6,500,000 $5,500,000
Philadelphia FlyersPHI 27 LW, C Left 29 7 10 17 0.59 8 49 0.14 15:26 - - - - -   UFA $2,300,000 $2,300,000
Toronto Maple LeafsTOR 41 C, LW Left 21 3 9 12 0.57 3 20 0.15 14:48 - - - - - NMC UFA $700,000 $700,000
Vegas Golden KnightsVGK 33 LD Left 31 3 14 17 0.55 13 44 0.07 22:53 - - - - -   UFA $4,000,000 $4,000,000
17. Adam Lowry
Winnipeg JetsWPG 28 C Left 33 7 11 18 0.55 0 54 0.13 15:44 - - - - -   UFA $2,916,666 $2,500,000
Buffalo SabresBUF 29 LW Left 32 2 15 17 0.53 -19 77 0.03 18:50 - - - - - NMC UFA $8,000,000 $8,000,000
Chicago BlackhawksCHI 28 LW, C Left 34 10 8 18 0.53 -14 62 0.16 16:56 - - - - -   UFA $2,250,000 $2,250,000
New Jersey DevilsNJD 36 C Right 27 4 10 14 0.52 3 28 0.14 16:41 - - - - - NTC UFA $5,750,000 $5,750,000
Montreal CanadiensMTL 36 RW Right 24 6 6 12 0.50 8 33 0.18 12:24 - - - - -   UFA $750,000 $750,000
New Jersey DevilsNJD 30 RW, LW Right 30 6 9 15 0.50 -4 75 0.08 18:00 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $4,650,000 $4,250,000
Tampa Bay LightningTBL 29 LW, RW Left 32 6 10 16 0.50 11 64 0.09 15:23 - - - - -   UFA $1,800,000 $1,800,000
Montreal CanadiensMTL 28 C Left 31 2 13 15 0.48 14 46 0.04 16:40 - - - - -   UFA $3,083,333 $3,250,000
Chicago BlackhawksCHI 35 C, LW Left 29 6 8 14 0.48 -5 33 0.18 15:21 - - - - -   UFA $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Ottawa SenatorsOTT 29 LW, RW, C Left 22 7 3 10 0.45 -1 30 0.23 13:18 - - - - -   UFA $3,375,000 $3,500,000
Florida PanthersFLA 26 C Left 33 7 8 15 0.45 -2 43 0.16 17:24 - - - - -   UFA $2,250,000 $2,250,000
28. Bobby Ryan
Detroit Red WingsDET 34 RW, LW Right 31 7 7 14 0.45 -14 71 0.10 15:43 - - - - -   UFA $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Philadelphia FlyersPHI 29 LD/RD Left 23 1 9 10 0.43 0 23 0.04 17:21 - - - - -   UFA $3,000,000 $3,000,000
Spoiler
PLAYER TEAM AGE POS HANDED GP G A P P/GP +/- Sh Sh% TOI W L SO GAA Sv% CLAUSE EXPIRY CAP HIT SALARY
Colorado AvalancheCOL 29 G Left 27 - - - - - - - - 20 7 5 1.69 .931   UFA $3,333,333 $2,750,000
Florida PanthersFLA 27 G Left 14 - - - - - - - - 8 4 1 2.28 .923   UFA $850,000 $950,000
Edmonton OilersEDM 39 G Left 16 - - - - - - - - 11 3 2 2.34 .922 NTC UFA $1,500,000 $1,500,000
Buffalo SabresBUF 27 G Left 12 - - - - - - - - 5 4 0 2.44 .919   UFA $2,600,000 $2,600,000
Detroit Red WingsDET 32 G Left 17 - - - - - - - - 8 6 0 2.78 .918   UFA $3,000,000 $2,500,000
New Jersey DevilsNJD 28 G Left 10 - - - - - - - - 3 4 2 2.59 .918   UFA $700,000 $700,000
Boston BruinsBOS 36 G Left 14 - - - - - - - - 7 4 2 2.25 .915   UFA $2,250,000 $2,250,000
Arizona CoyotesARI 32 G Left 11 - - - - - - - - 5 4 0 3.20 .913   UFA $4,250,000 $4,000,000
Carolina HurricanesCAR 33 G Left 17 - - - - - - - - 12 4 0 2.68 .909   UFA $3,400,000 $3,100,000
Calgary FlamesCGY 28 G Left 12 - - - - - - - - 3 6 1 2.86 .908   UFA $2,750,000 $2,750,000
Boston BruinsBOS 34 G Left 15 - - - - - - - - 8 4 0 2.41 .907   UFA $7,000,000 $6,500,000
Nashville PredatorsNSH 38 G Left 21 - - - - - - - - 8 11 1 3.07 .899 M-NTC, NMC UFA $5,000,000 $4,000,000
San Jose SharksSJS 35 G Left 16 - - - - - - - - 3 8 1 3.19 .899 M-NTC UFA $4,333,333 $2,500,000
Toronto Maple LeafsTOR 31 G Left 23 - - - - - - - - 13 8 0 2.91 .897 M-NTC UFA $5,000,000 $5,000,000
Philadelphia FlyersPHI 36 G Left 16 - - - - - - - - 7 4 2 2.97 .887   UFA $1,500,000 $1,500,000

 

Edited by Petey_BOI
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are rebuilding. What do you think the last few years of developing our draft picks into our best players has been if not a rebuild? I don't know how you could suggestion rebuilding a team that is currently rebuilding.

 

But to answer your question, Colorado. I would 100% trade our entire roster for the Avs. I love our core, but the Avs future is so bright it hurts.

  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure Canucks is rebuilding.

What is the point of completed rebuilding?

Win a Stanley cup?  or might be two / three cups?

In my mind, rebuilding is never ended.

A player is young now, but will be old years later and need to find a replacement.

 

All the teams in NHL are our trading partners, if they have pieces Canucks need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is some logic for trading both Horvat and Miller, and making BB the edler part of the new core.    Doubt the fanbase has much stomach for it, but they could easily wipe 11 or so million of cap off (and keep it off, because hard to find better value), tank for two years and then go all in when BB is in his peak prime and the younger guys are entering their early prime.   Would pretty much wipe out an entire decade, with a first round exit and a nice covid play-in ... who knows really.    As for the OP, the only core id consider other the ours ranging from Podz-Horvat is maybe CAR.   They are something else.   CAR also paid their dues, took a couple rebuilds and missed nine years in a row of playoffs to get there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, kanucks25 said:

We don't need a complete rebuild, there are some great pieces in place.

I agree with this sentence 100%

There is about 17ish guys on the roster I think are good guys in their roles. The 6 I think we can upgrade on generally are waiting on the LU cap recapture money and the Eriksson money, which when added to the money those six are getting would allow for a good upgrade at all 6 spots. 

 

I do think we are being too harsh on the GM considering the Lu Cap recapture is not his fault in any way and is a little bit 'off' by the league to impose on us for making legal contract that the league approved under one CBA and then punishing us for it under the new one. Bad Call Buttman.  So yeah, I am giving the GM some slack with that as no one guessed Eriksson's offense would shrivel up and die the day after he was signed. No one could have. Take away Eriksson and the cap crunch due to covid and LU's recapture and I don't think the GM has done anything so egregious as to be fired over. 

 

I know there is a wall of disagreement among some fans though. 

 

EDIT: imagine the club next year with PODZ and possibly a very high draft pick coming to join the current core. It is a broad general view, but the club is heading in the right direction. The core is still early for its window. We were lucky at last years bubble, and it gave us a taste of what to expect over time. 

 

 

Edited by Primal Optimist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Primal Optimist said:

We were lucky at last years bubble, and it gave us a taste of what to expect over time. 

All it showed was elite goaltending can bail you out for a round or two in the postseason.  Problem is, as you go deeper in the playoffs, you'll run into other teams with good goaltending AND a blue line that can defend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NewbieCanuckFan said:

All it showed was elite goaltending can bail you out for a round or two in the postseason.  Problem is, as you go deeper in the playoffs, you'll run into other teams with good goaltending AND a blue line that can defend.

that "elite" goaltending you are bemoaning about losing is at 15 wins and 17 losses right now, lol. 

in fact Markstrom has won 1 in his last 5 starts. I guess he doesn't have a blue line that can defend there either. 

Edited by Primal Optimist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Primal Optimist said:

that "elite" goaltending you are bemoaning about losing is at 15 wins and 17 losses right now, lol. 

Can't expect your goalies to score goals and or stop all the shots.  Plus you also want a backup goalie that doesn't suck.  A .500 record doesn't mean much in the time of the loser point.

 

Having no healthy 3C magnifies the problem of the blue line.

Edited by NewbieCanuckFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NewbieCanuckFan said:

Can't expect your goalies to score goals and or stop all the shots.  Plus you also want a backup goalie that doesn't suck.

Yeah, Florida sucked, not Markstrom, Vancouver too and now Calgary, hope he doesn't get traded at the deadline to Tampa Bay, they would lose all ability to score and defend the blueline. I see what your sayin now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Primal Optimist said:

Yeah, Florida sucked, not Markstrom, Vancouver too and now Calgary, hope he doesn't get traded at the deadline to Tampa Bay, they would lose all ability to score and defend the blueline. I see what your sayin now.

Canucks have had strong goalie coaching generally since the Nonis days.  About the one true positive constant.  You not only need good drafting with respect to goalies but proper development as well.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Primal Optimist said:

Yeah, Florida sucked, not Markstrom, Vancouver too and now Calgary, hope he doesn't get traded at the deadline to Tampa Bay, they would lose all ability to score and defend the blueline. I see what your sayin now.

Are you actually suggesting that Markstrom didn't carry us to any success we had over the last ~two seasons here lol?

Edited by kanucks25
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the question we all struggle with is..............what is next?

 

What are those last moves?

 

I think Jimmy McGill's (and others) opinion about hiring a president of Hockey Operations is the correct action............

 

I love our U25 players, but Miller and even Horvat will start aging out before all these guys will start hitting their prime............

 

So what is the move? Sure I have an opinion, but truthfully our opinions, are generally fan type opinions........

 

We need that guy who can help Benning in the final moves..............something that Jim and Franco may be resistant to.

 

Who is that guy? I have not a clue????

 

 

Edited by janisahockeynut
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...