aGENT Posted March 12, 2022 Share Posted March 12, 2022 5 hours ago, HKSR said: Sure, but that doesn't provide any new cap flexibility for Vancouver. A few hundred K here, a few hundred K there, improved D and faster players (plus the option to move out other D with better, younger, faster players). Our cap issues aren't likely to be solved in one move. We'll have to chip away at it. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted March 12, 2022 Share Posted March 12, 2022 Still think LA is the team that wants Brock the most. Brock + 1st (2022) for Turcotte + Grans + 2nd (2022) Unfortunately, the Kings' contracts are so solid that they have no 'dumps' to add. They would probably want to do Brock for Kempe + Grans + 2nd (make it a 1st might make it work for Van). Kempe Pete Garland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicklas Bo Hunter Posted March 12, 2022 Share Posted March 12, 2022 Mcbain is apparently not willing to sign with Min. I think Van should ask for addison+ mcbain+ Frédéric Gaudreau (cap) for Boeser %50 retained. It is a great chance to get 2 young studs one being a RHD and the other being a potential top 6 C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted March 13, 2022 Share Posted March 13, 2022 Landeskog out long term.........Boeser for Byram? High risk, very very high reward if he can get back. I'd do Boeser for Sam Girard too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJC Posted March 13, 2022 Share Posted March 13, 2022 9 minutes ago, stawns said: Landeskog out long term.........Boeser for Byram? High risk, very very high reward if he can get back. I'd do Boeser for Sam Girard too Girard injured too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted March 13, 2022 Share Posted March 13, 2022 5 hours ago, higgyfan said: Still think LA is the team that wants Brock the most. Brock + 1st (2022) for Turcotte + Grans + 2nd (2022) Unfortunately, the Kings' contracts are so solid that they have no 'dumps' to add. They would probably want to do Brock for Kempe + Grans + 2nd (make it a 1st might make it work for Van). Kempe Pete Garland We are already going to be in LTIR so maybe we can take Edler back to retire a Canuck 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted March 13, 2022 Share Posted March 13, 2022 56 minutes ago, stawns said: Landeskog out long term.........Boeser for Byram? High risk, very very high reward if he can get back. I'd do Boeser for Sam Girard too If anything I think that makes a Miller trade more likely then Boeser. Landy and Miller play a more similar game then Boeser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted March 13, 2022 Share Posted March 13, 2022 8 hours ago, Nicklas Bo Hunter said: Mcbain is apparently not willing to sign with Min. I think Van should ask for addison+ mcbain+ Frédéric Gaudreau (cap) for Boeser %50 retained. It is a great chance to get 2 young studs one being a RHD and the other being a potential top 6 C The Wild are asking for a 2nd round pick for McBain per Russo and other insiders. The Wild aren't looking to change their active roster per Guerin, who made it also very clear that he is not in the slightest interested in giving up futures or prospects that they've worked hard to acquire. Boeser would also be an ill-fit in Minnesota - doesn't have the skating speed and he's not a play driver. Guerin also mocked the idea of targeting local players and even complained about players wanting to be in Minnesota for personal reasons over hockey reasons. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-23 Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 (edited) Sticking with the unpopular opinion. Want to see Boes moved for a defence man and Domi signed. Also think we should sell high on Pearson and Motte. Edited March 14, 2022 by J-23 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boknows08 Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 10 hours ago, J-23 said: Sticking with the unpopular opinion. Want to see Boes moved for a defence man and Domi signed. Also think we should sell high on Pearson and Motte. There has been talk on the hfboards as of late with the Pens dman Freidman being a rhd playing his offside over Petterson and POJ. Sullivan said its because Freidman has been playing good but maybe something's there with the trade deadline soon. One poster suggested Boeser for Kapanen POJ and a pick. I would like to see a deal of Pearson for Debrusk although Pearson has a NTC. With regards to Motte, there's rumours that Tampa are really interested, well who isnt. Something around Motte and Schenn for Callan Foote +. Sign Motte in the off season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicklas Bo Hunter Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 11 hours ago, J-23 said: Sticking with the unpopular opinion. Want to see Boes moved for a defence man and Domi signed. Also think we should sell high on Pearson and Motte. Domi going to Toronto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 On 3/12/2022 at 11:11 AM, higgyfan said: Still think LA is the team that wants Brock the most. Brock + 1st (2022) for Turcotte + Grans + 2nd (2022) Unfortunately, the Kings' contracts are so solid that they have no 'dumps' to add. They would probably want to do Brock for Kempe + Grans + 2nd (make it a 1st might make it work for Van). Kempe Pete Garland I'm thinking this too. LA have a few RD prospects (Clarke, Grans, Durzi) and a lot of C prospects (Kupari, Vilardi, Byfield, Turcotte, etc) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khay Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 On 3/12/2022 at 11:46 PM, mll said: The Wild are asking for a 2nd round pick for McBain per Russo and other insiders. The Wild aren't looking to change their active roster per Guerin, who made it also very clear that he is not in the slightest interested in giving up futures or prospects that they've worked hard to acquire. Boeser would also be an ill-fit in Minnesota - doesn't have the skating speed and he's not a play driver. Guerin also mocked the idea of targeting local players and even complained about players wanting to be in Minnesota for personal reasons over hockey reasons. I think by now, it's clear that Wilds don't want Boeser. At 7.5 mil QO and with pending buyout caps coming on the books, don't think they would acquire him just because he is from Minnesota. Boeser is a good player but he needs to become more physical to be effective, especially given his skating issues. Although he has been disappointing of late, if we can re-sign him at 6.5 mil, I'd like to keep him. He's good for 20-30 goals 50-60 points Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 Rick on Donnie and Dhali today regarding Boeser... "I keep hearing though the canucks, both sides would like to cut a new long term deal. They are gonna try though" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 (edited) 11 minutes ago, coryberg said: Rick on Donnie and Dhali today regarding Boeser... "I keep hearing though the canucks, both sides would like to cut a new long term deal. They are gonna try though" This makes no sense. "Both sides would like to cut a new long term deal. They are going to try though". Did Dalli mean "AND" they are going to try? Edited March 14, 2022 by Alflives 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 4 minutes ago, coryberg said: Rick on Donnie and Dhali today regarding Boeser... "I keep hearing though the canucks, both sides would like to cut a new long term deal. They are gonna try though" Long term deal at around 6 mil is great! Anything above that and you’re talking about money for impact players. Boeser is not an impact player, but rather a good support player. 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJC Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 Let’s hope you’re right about this, Rick Dung-on-wall. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 On 3/12/2022 at 11:11 AM, higgyfan said: Still think LA is the team that wants Brock the most. Brock + 1st (2022) for Turcotte + Grans + 2nd (2022) Unfortunately, the Kings' contracts are so solid that they have no 'dumps' to add. They would probably want to do Brock for Kempe + Grans + 2nd (make it a 1st might make it work for Van). Kempe Pete Garland I doubt they move Kempe, also, I would prefer Brock faber over grans, but that's just me, I like the outline of your trade, moving brock and our first and getting a high end, essentially read-now player in Turcotte and an organization positional need in grans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 32 minutes ago, DeNiro said: Long term deal at around 6 mil is great! Anything above that and you’re talking about money for impact players. Boeser is not an impact player, but rather a good support player. boeser realizes how hard it is to play in this league and realizes he should just take some money and sign long term 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 34 minutes ago, DeNiro said: Long term deal at around 6 mil is great! Anything above that and you’re talking about money for impact players. Boeser is not an impact player, but rather a good support player. Boeser is a guy we could sign to the full 8 years to better spread out the cap. 6.25x8. That's 50 million guaranteed money for Boeser. I think he signs that deal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts