-Vintage Canuck- Posted October 19, 2021 Share Posted October 19, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted October 19, 2021 Share Posted October 19, 2021 B.C. COVID-19 pandemic update: As of Tuesday, Oct. 19, 2021, 89.2% (4,136,000) of eligible people 12 and older in B.C. have received their first dose of COVID-19 vaccine and 83.5% (3,870,709) have received their second dose. In addition, 89.7% (3,879,091) of all eligible adults in B.C. have received their first dose and 84.2% (3,640,757) have received their second dose. B.C. is reporting 560 new cases of COVID-19, including eight epi-linked cases, for a total of 198,838 cases in the province. There are 4,913 active cases of COVID-19 in the province, and 191,476 people who tested positive have recovered. Of the active cases, 382 individuals are in hospital and 146 are in intensive care. The remaining people are recovering at home in self-isolation. Note: Intensive care numbers are a subset of the total in hospital. They are not in addition to the number of people in hospital. The new/active cases include: 208 new cases in Fraser Health Total active cases: 2,052 80 new cases in Vancouver Coastal Health Total active cases: 717 79 new cases in Interior Health Total active cases: 772 131 new cases in Northern Health Total active cases: 797 61 new cases in Island Health Total active cases: 516 one new case of a person who resides outside of Canada Total active cases: 59 In the past 24 hours, five new deaths have been reported, for an overall total of 2,086. The new deaths include: Fraser Health: two Northern Health: two Island Health: one There has been one new health-care facility outbreak at The Emerald at Elim Village (Fraser Health), for a total of 23 active outbreaks, including: long-term care: Willingdon Care Centre, Westminster House, Magnolia Gardens, Manoah Manor, Cherington Place, West Shore Laylum, Queens Park Care Centre, Heritage Village (Fraser Health); Amica Lions Gate (Vancouver Coastal Health); Cottonwoods Care Centre, Overlander, Village by the Station, Haven Hill Retirement Centre (Interior Health); and Wrinch Memorial Hospital (Northern Health). acute care: Mission Memorial Hospital (Fraser Health); University Hospital of Northern BC, GR Baker Memorial Hospital (Northern Health); and Tofino General Hospital (Island Health). assisted or independent living: Sunset Manor, Evergreen Manor, Menno Terrace West, The Emerald at Elim Village (Fraser Health); and Cooper Place (Vancouver Coastal Health). From Oct. 11-17, people not fully vaccinated accounted for 67.1% of cases and from Oct. 4-17 they accounted for 75.5% of hospitalizations. Past week cases (Oct. 11-17) – Total 3,997 Not vaccinated: 2,407 (60.2%) Partially vaccinated: 277 (6.9%) Fully vaccinated: 1,313 (32.8%) Past two weeks cases hospitalized (Oct. 4-17) – Total 384 Not vaccinated: 268 (69.8%) Partially vaccinated: 22 (5.7%) Fully vaccinated: 94 (24.5%) Past week, cases per 100,000 population after adjusting for age (Oct. 11-17) Not vaccinated: 281.7 Partially vaccinated: 81.2 Fully vaccinated: 31.1 Past two weeks, cases hospitalized per 100,000 population after adjusting for age (Oct. 4-17) Not vaccinated: 45.2 Partially vaccinated: 9.7 Fully vaccinated: 2.1 Since December 2020, the Province has administered 8,073,677 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines. https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2021HLTH0185-002000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tortorella's Rant Posted October 19, 2021 Share Posted October 19, 2021 As I've said before and will again. More evidence of it: The Pharma apologists in this thread, about as morally bankrupt as one has to be, pathetically aren't even part of this special profiteering club either and therefore any lack of motive continue to make asinine defenses. Defenses of Pharma practices such as Merck's 40x markup to "cover R&D costs" on a treatment despite being taxpayer funded is rational and just when it comes to saving lives and ending the pandemic as soon as possible, or to get as close to that as we can. It has always been about making an exorbitant profit off the health of people, at the expense of people's lives, as per what Pharma regularly does. Instead of acknowledging what couldn't be more evident aside from a full blown confession from Pharma itself, these same apologist hacks right out of the apologetics playbook continue to double down on that stubbornness. They do this because they have deemed those critical of Pharma at this time, for any reason, as "anti-vaxer", which is so often incorrect and easily falsifiable. At least we both know I'm right even though the other side will never concede that notion. Pope asks pharmaceutical companies to release patents for COVID-19 vaccines https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2021/10/16/pope-pharmaceutical-companies-patents-covid-19-vaccines/3221634420392/ Moderna, Racing for Profits, Keeps Covid Vaccine Out of Reach of Poor https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/09/business/moderna-covid-vaccine.html?fbclid=IwAR2ohBnE_tm1KrCCb-9qMhsql_fWQrjBPqocTvd3O3IyZRR-zQGuvT-hQjo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted October 19, 2021 Share Posted October 19, 2021 So you moan about big Pharma, by posting something that shows Pfizer and Johnson and Johnson are doing good things. So rather than smearing a whole industry, would it not be better to say " Hey Moderna are being jerks, compared to others in the field"? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Arrogant Worms Posted October 19, 2021 Share Posted October 19, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedestroyerofworlds Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 4 hours ago, Tortorella's Rant said: As I've said before and will again. More evidence of it: The Pharma apologists in this thread, about as morally bankrupt as one has to be, pathetically aren't even part of this special profiteering club either and therefore any lack of motive continue to make asinine defenses. Defenses of Pharma practices such as Merck's 40x markup to "cover R&D costs" on a treatment despite being taxpayer funded is rational and just when it comes to saving lives and ending the pandemic as soon as possible, or to get as close to that as we can. It has always been about making an exorbitant profit off the health of people, at the expense of people's lives, as per what Pharma regularly does. Instead of acknowledging what couldn't be more evident aside from a full blown confession from Pharma itself, these same apologist hacks right out of the apologetics playbook continue to double down on that stubbornness. They do this because they have deemed those critical of Pharma at this time, for any reason, as "anti-vaxer", which is so often incorrect and easily falsifiable. At least we both know I'm right even though the other side will never concede that notion. Pope asks pharmaceutical companies to release patents for COVID-19 vaccines https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2021/10/16/pope-pharmaceutical-companies-patents-covid-19-vaccines/3221634420392/ Moderna, Racing for Profits, Keeps Covid Vaccine Out of Reach of Poor https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/09/business/moderna-covid-vaccine.html?fbclid=IwAR2ohBnE_tm1KrCCb-9qMhsql_fWQrjBPqocTvd3O3IyZRR-zQGuvT-hQjo Pharmaceutical companies making profit in a system that is based on...PROFIT. Companies making profit is not an argument against the products they are selling. I think that if you go back in a few other threads, you would find that posters such as myself have pushed for healthcare ideas that reduce or take the profit out of healthcare. If you are trying to argue for strict regulation or even nationalization, I'm pretty sure there are people who have been supporting vaccines who would jump on board and others who would screech socialism. I think the point you are trying to make is probably better suited for a different thread. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKNuck96 Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 Also FYI AstraZeneca vaccine is being sold at cost. That was 97% UK taxpayer funded as well. It was also a cooperation between two parties Oxford University and AZ which is primarily a cancer drug and treatment company. The formula is made in multiple sites and licensed to other countries to produce. I believe AZ has lost money on it as well and the hit it has taken on a PR front as well as it was the target politicking as well. So it’s not Big Pharma at all that’s a lazy smear brush of someone who cannot be bothered to scratch the surface of what’s actually happening. one player acting in bad faith doesn’t mean they all are 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 16 hours ago, gurn said: So you moan about big Pharma, by posting something that shows Pfizer and Johnson and Johnson are doing good things. So rather than smearing a whole industry, would it not be better to say " Hey Moderna are being jerks, compared to others in the field"? thats too fine a point for him to accomplish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 12 hours ago, thedestroyerofworlds said: Pharmaceutical companies making profit in a system that is based on...PROFIT. Companies making profit is not an argument against the products they are selling. I think that if you go back in a few other threads, you would find that posters such as myself have pushed for healthcare ideas that reduce or take the profit out of healthcare. If you are trying to argue for strict regulation or even nationalization, I'm pretty sure there are people who have been supporting vaccines who would jump on board and others who would screech socialism. I think the point you are trying to make is probably better suited for a different thread. I don't think you need to do that, just better regulation. There's nothing stopping our gov'ts from requiring pharma companies to provide doses around the world, or participate in a global vaccine sharing system. The issue with taking profit out is you will lose a lot of innovative thinkers and companies, but you don't need to let them run wild either. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 9 hours ago, UKNuck96 said: Also FYI AstraZeneca vaccine is being sold at cost. This fact, has never gotten the respect it deserves. Astra got caught up in a government versus government fight; likely a casualty of the Brexit fiasco. Such a shame, as they provided a critical vaccine, at a critical time, even though it wasn't their main line of work. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedestroyerofworlds Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 6 minutes ago, JM_ said: I don't think you need to do that, just better regulation. There's nothing stopping our gov'ts from requiring pharma companies to provide doses around the world, or participate in a global vaccine sharing system. The issue with taking profit out is you will lose a lot of innovative thinkers and companies, but you don't need to let them run wild either. Thing is, there is a lot of initial research on drugs and treatments that is done in university labs or is heavily subsidized. The notion that only private enterprise is the only way innovation happens is a farce. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 (edited) 6 minutes ago, thedestroyerofworlds said: Thing is, there is a lot of initial research on drugs and treatments that is done in university labs or is heavily subsidized. The notion that only private enterprise is the only way innovation happens is a farce. for sure that happens there. But then what comes next? the cost to scale up is massive. Even something as small as QLT in Vancouver that got spun out of UBC took 100s of millions to get going, and that was for one specialized drug with a small patient population. Edited October 20, 2021 by JM_ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedestroyerofworlds Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 3 minutes ago, JM_ said: for sure that happens there. But then what comes next? the cost to scale up is massive. Even something as small as QLT in Vancouver that go spun out of UBC took 100s of millions to get going, and that was for one specialized drug with a small patient population. Yes. Capitalism exists, so costs and profits are part of it. Torts was trying to make the point that we vaccine defenders were pro-Pharma all the way. That this kind of discussion could easily derail things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 @thedestroyerofworlds I do think one area where we can get universities to make a bigger impact is with orphan drugs. Big companies won't do it as there's just losses in it for them, but if Canada e.g. funded a central lab (and insurance) for production of drugs for rare diseases that would be a huge benefit to a lot of families that can't afford treatments. My worry about relying on uni's is its all curiosity-driven, so if a prof doesn't care about a particular disease nothing will get done. But if there is a market to treat a disease you'll see for-profit companies trying to come up with something. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 Just now, thedestroyerofworlds said: Yes. Capitalism exists, so costs and profits are part of it. Torts was trying to make the point that we vaccine defenders were pro-Pharma all the way. That this kind of discussion could easily derail things. I think he was pointing that thing my way. I tried having a rational discussion with him last week and he couldn't handle it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedestroyerofworlds Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 Just now, JM_ said: @thedestroyerofworlds I do think one area where we can get universities to make a bigger impact is with orphan drugs. Big companies won't do it as there's just losses in it for them, but if Canada e.g. funded a central lab (and insurance) for production of drugs for rare diseases that would be a huge benefit to a lot of families that can't afford treatments. My worry about relying on uni's is its all curiosity-driven, so if a prof doesn't care about a particular disease nothing will get done. But if there is a market to treat a disease you'll see for-profit companies trying to come up with something. Kinda like how we should have some ability to produce our own vaccines. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 Just now, thedestroyerofworlds said: Kinda like how we should have some ability to produce our own vaccines. exactly. Its criminal that the Lib's and then CPC let that wither. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 19 hours ago, -Vintage Canuck- said: If they keep playing like they did in Buffalo, 100% will be a pipe dream.... 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 5 hours ago, thedestroyerofworlds said: Thing is, there is a lot of initial research on drugs and treatments that is done in university labs or is heavily subsidized. The notion that only private enterprise is the only way innovation happens is a farce. Just a mention? And offering no opinion. Private and public universities rely massively on both donations. And collaboration. With govt., institutions like hospitals, other labs, companis. Universities often own and sell both research, patents. Just as often also have their research owned by those who commissioned it. Circumstance is as wild as the deals that surround the industry. Simply because not all research was done by a pharmaceutical company means little. Which is why intellectual property in of its own is a specialized field of law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 B.C. COVID-19 pandemic update: As of Wednesday, Oct. 20, 2021, 89.3% (4,138,787) of eligible people 12 and older in B.C. have received their first dose of COVID-19 vaccine and 83.6% (3,876,579) received their second dose. In addition, 89.7% (3,881,593) of all eligible adults in B.C. have received their first dose and 84.3% (3,646,128) received their second dose. B.C. is reporting 696 new cases of COVID-19, including eight epi-linked cases, for a total of 199,534 cases in the province. There are 4,888 active cases of COVID-19 in the province and 192,189 people who tested positive have recovered. Of the active cases, 370 individuals are in hospital and 139 are in intensive care. The remaining people are recovering at home in self-isolation. Note: Intensive care numbers are a subset of the total in hospital. They are not in addition to the number of people in hospital. The new/active cases include: 252 new cases in Fraser Health Total active cases: 1,929 76 new cases in Vancouver Coastal Health Total active cases: 724 118 new cases in Interior Health Total active cases: 795 191 new cases in Northern Health Total active cases: 864 59 new cases in Island Health Total active cases: 517 no new cases of a people who reside outside of Canada Total active cases: 59 In the past 24 hours, six new deaths have been reported, for an overall total of 2,092. The new deaths include: Fraser Health: five Vancouver Coastal Health: one There has been one new health-care facility outbreak at Swedish Assisted Living Residence (Fraser Health), for a total of 24 active outbreaks, including: long-term care: Willingdon Care Centre, Westminster House, Magnolia Gardens, Manoah Manor, Cherington Place, West Shore Laylum, Queens Park Care Centre, Heritage Village (Fraser Health); Amica Lions Gate (Vancouver Coastal Health); Cottonwoods Care Centre, Overlander, Village by the Station, Haven Hill Retirement Centre (Interior Health); and Wrinch Memorial Hospital (Northern Health). acute care: Mission Memorial Hospital (Fraser Health); University Hospital of Northern BC, GR Baker Memorial Hospital (Northern Health); and Tofino General Hospital (Island Health). assisted or independent living: Sunset Manor, Evergreen Manor, Menno Terrace West, The Emerald at Elim Village, Swedish Assisted Living Residence (Fraser Health); and Cooper Place (Vancouver Coastal Health). From Oct. 12-18, people not fully vaccinated accounted for 67.2% of cases and from Oct. 5-18, they accounted for 74.9% of hospitalizations. Past week cases (Oct. 12-18) – Total 4,145 Not vaccinated: 2,488 (60.0%) Partially vaccinated: 296 (7.2%) Fully vaccinated: 1,361 (32.8%) Past two weeks cases hospitalized (Oct. 5-18) – Total 458 Not vaccinated: 315 (68.8%) Partially vaccinated: 28 (6.1%) Fully vaccinated: 115 (25.1%) Past week, cases per 100,000 population after adjusting for age (Oct. 12-18) Not vaccinated: 294.3 Partially vaccinated: 86.9 Fully vaccinated: 32.1 Past two weeks, cases hospitalized per 100,000 population after adjusting for age (Oct. 5-18) Not vaccinated: 54.1 Partially vaccinated: 11.9 Fully vaccinated: 2.6 Since December 2020, the Province has administered 8,088,314 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines. https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2021HLTH0062-002006 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now