Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Report] Benn Wants out of Dallas


Recommended Posts

Benn is one of my favourite players so My judgement might be a little foggy :lol:

 

i see this is a cap dump thing for dallas. They’re gonna be in on karlsson, there’s permanent bad blood and they might wanna turn the page on the benn regime 

 

noooooo way would I deal horvat. Not even in a one for one 

 

Hanzal has been a disaster for Dallas and has 1 year left on his deal at 4.75m so if we could take that off their hands it would water down the asking price 

 

To dal: gaudette, goldobin, hutton, 1st pick 2020 (top 10 protected) 

 

to van: benn, hanzal

 

benn has a 9.5m cap hit for 6 more years and is coming off a 63 point year. His value is not that high and if it is then I’m out on acquiring him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Devron44 said:

There is no way this works for the Canucks unless Eriksson goes the other way with the full cap hit

Eriksson literally will cost next to nothing for Dallas - his cap hit goes to the books, but his actual salary is pretty low. Furthermore, Eriksson has a history in Dallas and has a history of producing.

 

That being said, I don't actually believe Benn for Eriksson would be a good deal for Dallas. That's a rip off lol.

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, billabong said:

Benn is one of my favourite players so My judgement might be a little foggy :lol:

 

i see this is a cap dump thing for dallas. They’re gonna be in on karlsson, there’s permanent bad blood and they might wanna turn the page on the benn regime 

 

noooooo way would I deal horvat. Not even in a one for one 

 

Hanzal has been a disaster for Dallas and has 1 year left on his deal at 4.75m so if we could take that off their hands it would water down the asking price 

 

To dal: gaudette, goldobin, hutton, 1st pick 2020 (top 10 protected) 

 

to van: benn, hanzal

 

benn has a 9.5m cap hit for 6 more years and is coming off a 63 point year. His value is not that high and if it is then I’m out on acquiring him 

He actually only scored 53 points last year. Not so hot for $9.5M.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, VIC_CITY said:

He actually only scored 53 points last year. Not so hot for $9.5M.

It was a bad year for him... and most of the Dallas roster.

 

The year before that he scored 36 goals and 79 points.  He is a PPG player consistently.  I take the risk it was an off year any day.

 

A PPG top line LW who plays physical hockey... if you asked Benning his exact wish list it would be that and a RD with a point shot.

 

Folks can argue about the price, but if anyone says they don’t want Benn as a player, even at that contract, they have been huffing too much glue.

  • Cheers 1
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be down to get him, though as others mentioned it depends on the price.

Benning seems like the type to jump on buy-low deals and if this is one I could see something happen.

Agreed with 10th overall, Jake (really hasn't shown much at this point) and Eriksson (cap return) as a starting point, maybe one more asset if needed (Baertschi?).  
Between Heiskanen, Lindell and Oleksiak though, I don't see them needing an unproven Juolevi on their left side D.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think boeser would have to be going the other way. i never works out that the other team takes what we want to give. would you trade pettersson for a couple of unproven players or players on the down side of their careers? would you trafe petey for virtanen and juolevi or louie and sutter? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Nuxfanabroad said:

Lots here hated Benn for bad-mouthing the twins. If you posted that way & now entertain this notion..ain't that a touch hypocritical?

Benn was a piece of manure then & he’s a piece of manure now.  He can still go ***** himself from my point of view.

Edited by NewbieCanuckFan
  • Cheers 1
  • Haha 2
  • Wat 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sonoman said:

That’s an enormous salary for the next 6 years at which time he’ll be 36.  Not sure how to fit that in.  Louie, Sutter, Goldie +/- other moving parts.  

This is a good deal for Dallas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Dazzle said:

Eriksson literally will cost next to nothing for Dallas - his cap hit goes to the books, but his actual salary is pretty low. Furthermore, Eriksson has a history in Dallas and has a history of producing.

 

That being said, I don't actually believe Benn for Eriksson would be a good deal for Dallas. That's a rip off lol.

I agree that would be a rip for Dallas but you gotta think he’d have to be one of the pieces going that way for it to make any sense from a Canucks stand point 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...