Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Signing] Nicklas Jensen signs with Jokerit (KHL)


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, iinatcc said:

They've been more right than Canucks drafting in the last 10 years <_<

Not sure how you can say that - last five years haven't had enough time to determine who drafted well and who didn't.    Your opinion though.   I typically find NHL CS very swayed by "sexy" picks and they often miss really badly after the obvious top one to three and are downright horrid in identifying gems like the Karlssons of the world.  In 2008, for example (you chose 10 years, so went back that far), they had the following for international skaters - he was fourth and they had him outside first round in an overall sense.   North American skaters ranked ahead of him included:

Luca Sbisa, D; Colby Robak, D; Joshua Bailey, C; Michael Del Zotto, D; Zac Dalpe, C

 

International had three ahead of him:

 

1. Nikita Filatov, LW, Russia; 2. Kirill Petrov, RW, Russia; 3. Mattias Tedenby, LW, Sweden; 4. Erik Karlsson, D, Sweden; 5. Anton Gustafsson, C, Sewden; 6. Roman Josi, D, Swtizerland; 7. Viktor Tikhonov, LW/RW, Russia; 8. Vjateslav Voinov, D, Russia; 9. Evgeny Grachev, C, Russia; 10. Dmitri Kugryshev, RW, Russia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, drummerboy said:

Yeah. It totally is hindsight.  

First of all,  Saad might have been BPA to some scouts, but a lot had Jensen going higher than he did.   It is a crapshoot. Especially later in the round. 

Yup, Jensen fell from being a projected mid-round pick to us, not that different from how Chychrun fell last year or Vilardi this year. It doesn't mean you have to pick that player if they've fallen past projections, just that you have to be prepared to live with the risk of whatever drawbacks are keeping teams from picking them.

 

27 minutes ago, skolozsy2 said:

Hawks 1st selection was Mark McNeill.  He's been a beaut.

Yup, nobody's perfect. They could have taken Klefbom with their first pick (taken right after McNeill) but still waited to pick Saad. But "it's not hindsight"...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Jaku said:

It's a good thing the Canucks picked him over Brandon Saad. Saad is so bad D:

 

 

 

Whole 42 picks before he was taken including the entire first round and the top of the second so lots of teams had 1 or more chance to take him.

 

A better negative comparative take of that draft year result would be: 

 

Canucks took Jensen 1 pick before Rakell..

 

Boston Bruins Scouting lead by our man Benning took Khokhlachev at 40 over Saad at 42 and missed on the best russian in the draft Kucherov at 58.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, iinatcc said:

They've been more right than Canucks drafting in the last 10 years <_<

Then why even bother with the draft?  Just assign all the players according to somebody's "BPA".

 

Btw, who was "BPA" when the Canucks took Jordan Schroeder?  How about in 2008 when they took Hodgson?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jaku said:

It's a good thing the Canucks picked him over Brandon Saad. Saad is so bad D:

Yeah, or maybe that Markus Granlund kid. He looks like he's going places.

 

                                                  regards,  G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He had all the physical tools to be successful in the NHL... but just didn't seem to have that "X" factor to be an NHL pro for whatever reason.

 

Smooth skater, elite wrist shot, good offensive abilities, with size and strength, and had a strong 2-way game back in junior.... not a bad pick, just not every player makes it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jaku said:

It's a good thing the Canucks picked him over Brandon Saad. Saad is so bad D:

 

 

 

I wanted Boone Jenner that year,. oh well

 

Still surprised that Jensen didn't get an NHL offer based on his excellent AHL performance last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Quantum said:

We didn't just pass on Saad we also passed on: John Gibson, Boone Jenner, Rickard Rakell, or Nikita Kucherov to take Jensen. 

 

What a waste... still, could be worse, at least we didn't select Zack Phillips or Tyler Biggs (neither player has played an NHL game/projects to ever play one) that year (2011!)

I really wanted the Canucks to take him that draft, was pissed when we passed him over. The other guys on that list I had no idea who or what they were about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rob_Zepp said:

Not sure how you can say that - last five years haven't had enough time to determine who drafted well and who didn't.    Your opinion though.   I typically find NHL CS very swayed by "sexy" picks and they often miss really badly after the obvious top one to three and are downright horrid in identifying gems like the Karlssons of the world.  In 2008, for example (you chose 10 years, so went back that far), they had the following for international skaters - he was fourth and they had him outside first round in an overall sense.   North American skaters ranked ahead of him included:

Luca Sbisa, D; Colby Robak, D; Joshua Bailey, C; Michael Del Zotto, D; Zac Dalpe, C

 

International had three ahead of him:

 

1. Nikita Filatov, LW, Russia; 2. Kirill Petrov, RW, Russia; 3. Mattias Tedenby, LW, Sweden; 4. Erik Karlsson, D, Sweden; 5. Anton Gustafsson, C, Sewden; 6. Roman Josi, D, Swtizerland; 7. Viktor Tikhonov, LW/RW, Russia; 8. Vjateslav Voinov, D, Russia; 9. Evgeny Grachev, C, Russia; 10. Dmitri Kugryshev, RW, Russia.

Look at  #6 in international skaters! Roman friggin Josi! They really botched that one up, best D in the league (arguably) and top 10 in the league. Rest of the top 10 had little to literally 0 impact. Minus Filatov, who people were SUPER high on, just...was a lazy puke lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, pluralsight said:

It wasn't the end of the world, the Canucks did end up with Baertschi, Boucher and Pedan from that draft. 

Yep... And we have Granlund from that draft too! Hindsight is 20/20 but it does highlight just how bad Mike Gillis was at drafting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...