MeanSeanBean Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 29 minutes ago, JamesBlondage said: Maybe they are thinking Byram might still be there at 6? this is the only reason why I could see this going down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flickyoursedin Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 29 minutes ago, Warhippy said: if It's only to 6 I don't see the point. 1st to 3rd but really after that what's the point? Hughes/Kakko/Byram/Dach then it's literally wide open. If anything they should look at garnering picks/prospects by weaponizing cap space at the draft on contracts with 2 years or less Definitely agree on weaponizing the cap. We should have been doing this for awhile now. However the moving up 4 spots could ensure they get their guy. I know we look at it as interchangeable from 4 to about 12 and everybody is good. I’m sure Benning and his group have each player ranked in a specific order and the realistic and favourite target is ranked to go a little higher than 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seannnp Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 This will be a draft floor deal. They will wait until Colorado picks to see if Byram is available. A conversation will be had with LA and DET if Byram is available, maybe even BUF. Ive said this a few times and based on the draft order, I could very well see Byram going 6 or 7. Hughes Kakko Turcotte Almost certain of this Col, La, Det, could all take Byram but from the reports ive read and the rumors out there it seems like it may go Dach - The only way I see them passing up on a potential 2c is if they feel 16thOA and Kerfoot, Jost, Zadaror can get them a 2c via trade. Zegras - most teams seem to covet Zegras more than anyone outside of Hughes and Kakko and LA needs a little of everything Podkolzin - from what ive heard, they are leaning towards the Russian This leaves Byram available at 7 potentially. We've seen what Byram can do on the ice but maybe his combine wasn't good or he interviewed poorly or simply others interviewed better. There could be a myriad of reasons that he is still available at 7. If he is there at 6 or 7, you make the call and you see what it takes. For the Canucks, Byram is a game changer based on the makeup and needs of this team. Outside of Horvat, Pettersson, Hughes, and Boeser, everyone is available. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herberts Vasiljevs Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 Nucks want Broberg. He won't be there at 10 for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 Bryam is most likely going top 5. I could see one of Dach, Zegras or Cozens being available at 6, but is it really worth the cost? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RakuRaku Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 What is the point of moving up to #6?? Is he NHL ready now?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garthsbutcher Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 3 minutes ago, Herberts Vasiljevs said: Nucks want Broberg. He won't be there at 10 for us. Good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post coryberg Posted June 19, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted June 19, 2019 Jd burke the insider 1 3 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RL. Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 Wouldn't the cost of moving up to 6 be equivalent to moving up to 3 now if Byram is somehow still on the board? Don't see it being any cheaper to move upto 6 on the floor than it would be to move up to 3 now tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 4 minutes ago, Herberts Vasiljevs said: Nucks want Broberg. He won't be there at 10 for us. I'm hoping he's gone... I'm hoping bunch of teams reach for players that are ranked 15-20. That means we will get a 4-9 ranked talent. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 (edited) DET Tanev 10OA19 VAN 8OA19 __________________ NJD Boeser 8OA19 VAN 1OA19 Have the Hughes brothers on the same team for years to come. Edited June 19, 2019 by Me_ 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camel Toe Drag Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 46 minutes ago, Warhippy said: if It's only to 6 I don't see the point. 1st to 3rd but really after that what's the point? Hughes/Kakko/Byram/Dach then it's literally wide open. If anything they should look at garnering picks/prospects by weaponizing cap space at the draft on contracts with 2 years or less It's not impossible that Byram is there at 6. JB probs working the phones and knows a thing or two. You know Stevie wants a Russian, let him have one at 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 (edited) 48 minutes ago, Warhippy said: if It's only to 6 I don't see the point. 1st to 3rd but really after that what's the point? Hughes/Kakko/Byram/Dach then it's literally wide open. If anything they should look at garnering picks/prospects by weaponizing cap space at the draft on contracts with 2 years or less If Benning and his team want to move up, then that means that they have a top 10 guy in mind which is probably 3-4 on their list. With their past records, I fully support them to go get their guy, rather than picking up whoever's left. Of course, as long as the price is fair. Like I posted a few times already this week. The cost of moving 2-3-4 spot within the top 10 in the past 15 years have been a mix of 2nd and/or 3rd rounder. I'd be fine with that. https://twitter.com/CapFriendly/status/1006184853182865408 Edited June 19, 2019 by timberz21 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Monahan Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 43 minutes ago, Warhippy said: Not a chance. Turcotte at 3 I can see. Byram being passed up for Dach by Colorado to ensure they have a 1-2 of Mackinnon Dach sure. But the moment Byram lands in LA's lap Edmonton and Detroit will do everything they can to move up. Puljujarvi 8th and 2nd round for 5th is far better than what we can offer Mantha and 6th for 5th is better than what we can give. I just see no point moving up and giving up assets Those deals aren’t even close to comparable value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odjick29willkillyou Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 44 minutes ago, Warhippy said: Not a chance. Turcotte at 3 I can see. Byram being passed up for Dach by Colorado to ensure they have a 1-2 of Mackinnon Dach sure. But the moment Byram lands in LA's lap Edmonton and Detroit will do everything they can to move up. Puljujarvi 8th and 2nd round for 5th is far better than what we can offer Mantha and 6th for 5th is better than what we can give. I just see no point moving up and giving up assets Ummmmm are we seriously forgetting about our secret weapon? Raymond, Ballard and a 1st? You're right though. We got Nothin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 2 minutes ago, Camel Toe Drag said: It's not impossible that Byram is there at 6. JB probs working the phones and knows a thing or two. You know Stevie wants a Russian, let him have one at 10. Maybe the Wings want Podkolzin, is that what you're saying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squamfan Posted June 19, 2019 Author Share Posted June 19, 2019 4 minutes ago, Me_ said: DET Tanev 10OA19 VAN 8OA19 __________________ NJD Boeser 8OA19 VAN 1OA19 Have the Hughes brothers on the same team for years to come. lol and give up ion a 40-50 goal scorer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 46 minutes ago, Warhippy said: Not a chance. Turcotte at 3 I can see. Byram being passed up for Dach by Colorado to ensure they have a 1-2 of Mackinnon Dach sure. But the moment Byram lands in LA's lap Edmonton and Detroit will do everything they can to move up. Puljujarvi 8th and 2nd round for 5th is far better than what we can offer Mantha and 6th for 5th is better than what we can give. I just see no point moving up and giving up assets Think you are overvaluing the cost of moving up a few spot in the top 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 Just now, Squamfan said: lol and give up ion a 40-50 goal scorer If Boeser doesn’t want to sign or wants to pull a Nylander, it might cost the Canucks the playoffs. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 3 minutes ago, Me_ said: If Boeser doesn’t want to sign or wants to pull a Nylander, it might cost the Canucks the playoffs. Do you really think Boeser is the type to pull that? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now