Kanukfanatic Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 Just now, BPA said: JV + Stecher + 10th 2019 for Barrie + 16th 2019 Would this work?? Not liking trading 1st 2020. That is definitely better than us giving up next years first. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yung1 Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, Maketherightmove said: What are you talking about? More like if the Avs get Byram the trade will be made. Yeah ok fair point. I was thinking maybe the 4th would be included in the deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babalu Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 Just now, WHL rocks said: It would be lottery protected. It's still a first at some point as it would be deferred to the following year likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EternalCanuckFan Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 Just now, Kanukfanatic said: That is definitely better than us giving up next years first. It's still a fairly steep price since those are two young players that the Canucks have been developing but it wouldn't hurt as much as giving up the 2020 1st since there would be no 1st coming back to the Canucks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squamfan Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 Just now, Maketherightmove said: What are you talking about? More like if the Avs get Byram the trade will be made. 2 minutes ago, Yung1 said: oof. Thats starting to make this sound like a trade that involves Horvat. Scary. @Yung1 think it’s like 2010 Ballard trade. Depending on who available. If it bynam there trading Barrie and if bynam is not there then there not trading barrie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush17 Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 5 minutes ago, Provost said: So if they get Byram they think Barrie is more expendable... or they see what forward they get and what other forward position they want back. Makes sense... I hope the sea from Jim gets worse if he has to wait and not make other deals... it will be Sakic on the clock with the pressure then. Essentially yes. Maybe they want a forward tho and this is a ploy. They already have Girard, Makar, and Timmins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinny in Vancouver Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 Since we don't have Raymond and Ballard anymore, how can we realistically get Tyson Barrie??? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Western Red Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 (edited) HOLY $&!#! Announcement coming up shortly Edited June 21, 2019 by Western Red Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPA Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 8 minutes ago, WHL rocks said: It would be lottery protected. What if Sakic doesn't want it to be lottery protected? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasCanuck Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 I think we'll get Barrie, I don't think it will cost what everyone is speculating that it would cost. If is Virtanen and our 2020 1st, I can live with that, our 1st next year should be more into the middle of the pack, candy Barrie and a couple of other smart moves and we're in playoffs again. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tas Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 11 minutes ago, babalu said: I don't think we should be trading firsts personally. I would mind trading down to 16. We could end up having injuries next year and that pick could be top 10 again. fortune favours the bold. you'll never get anywhere if you're always afraid, asking "but what if ... ?" and playing for tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THERETOOL Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 3 minutes ago, BPA said: What if Sakic doesn't want it to be lottery protected? you don't make the deal .. just no .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHL rocks Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 4 minutes ago, BPA said: What if Sakic doesn't want it to be lottery protected? No deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanuckGAME Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 4 minutes ago, BPA said: What if Sakic doesn't want it to be lottery protected? Well then big dink Jim will tell him to go **** himself. Srs. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 5 minutes ago, BPA said: What if Sakic doesn't want it to be lottery protected? No. Remember the razzing the Sens took all last year. Combine that with Canuck Luck and no way. The only time we will win a lottery is when we dont own the pick. Is what it is. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 If there's a 1st involved, it HAS to be lottery protected. Honestly, I don't like the idea of coughing up a 1st at all. What happened to "build through the draft"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atillaMYhun Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: If there's a 1st involved, it HAS to be lottery protected. Honestly, I don't like the idea of coughing up a 1st at all. What happened to "build through the draft"? The kids on here all got excited at the prospect of getting a new toy today. I'd love Barrie but not at the expense of next year's 1st, protected or not. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanuckGAME Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 (edited) 5 minutes ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: If there's a 1st involved, it HAS to be lottery protected. Honestly, I don't like the idea of coughing up a 1st at all. What happened to "build through the draft"? Exactly. Only way id trade our 1st is in a bigger trade where the other teams 1st is also involved so we move up or down in the 1st IMO trading 1sts is an option only elite teams gunning for a cup should consider. Our team isnt in a position to risk losing top end 1st round talent. Edited June 22, 2019 by CanuckGAME 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHL rocks Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 When you have opportunity to get a 27 yr old top pair RHD who puts up 50 or 60 Pts you give up the 1st. Virtanen was a top 10 pick so was OJ. Barrie is what we hope OJ would one day become. He still might but odds aren't great that you get a top pair D with a 1st. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanukfanatic Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 You guys are right that we should not be trading our 1sts in our rebuilding phase and JB has said that also. Maybe he swings some deal such as Virtanen, Stecher, and a 2nd in 2020? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now