VIC_CITY Posted December 31, 2019 Share Posted December 31, 2019 12 hours ago, Alflives said: He’s not a Canuck, that’s why for me. I want all other teams’ players to suck, and prospects to bustaroo. Love it! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted December 31, 2019 Share Posted December 31, 2019 (edited) Strome is also reported to be on the block if NYR stays this far off the playoff pace. Not a lot of teams have space to trade without sending money back... but we should be in on that if they would take a player like Sutter/Baertschi/Eriksson plus they pick/prospect they would want. Edited December 31, 2019 by Provost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokes Posted December 31, 2019 Share Posted December 31, 2019 8 hours ago, Dazzle said: So why was he fined then if it wasn't bad character? He should be awarded money then if it were truly a good character moment. Pfft. Don't give me that crap. He broke a rule so he got fined. Are you telling me every player who has ever been fined has bad character? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post 48MPHSlapShot Posted December 31, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted December 31, 2019 4 hours ago, smokes said: He broke a rule so he got fined. Are you telling me every player who has ever been fined has bad character? No, but if a pattern of entitlement starts to emerge the possibility should at least be considered. 1 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted December 31, 2019 Share Posted December 31, 2019 8 hours ago, smokes said: He broke a rule so he got fined. Are you telling me every player who has ever been fined has bad character? But really. Not reporting to your farm team as a yet unproven player is not a good sign. I'd take a chance on him, but wouldn't give up much. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzle Posted December 31, 2019 Share Posted December 31, 2019 12 hours ago, smokes said: He broke a rule so he got fined. Are you telling me every player who has ever been fined has bad character? It's definitely suggestive of it. Asking for a trade and now, from what it sounds like, he's unwilling to report. Yes, I guess we are right. He has self-entitlement issues. He's like Sang-Ho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted December 31, 2019 Share Posted December 31, 2019 On 12/24/2019 at 4:02 PM, Ossi Vaananen said: Haha, that's all of them! You might have missed Keppen Okay, some thought I made every prospect "untouchable", but hardly. This is the list of Canucks propsects that I'm okay moving in a package for upgrades: Jasek Graovac Gadjovich Perron Keppen McDonough Karlsson Costmar Lockwood Palmu Manukyan Malone Plasek Brisebois Teves Chatfield Eliot Sautner Kielly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanukfanatic Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 10 hours ago, NUCKER67 said: Okay, some thought I made every prospect "untouchable", but hardly. This is the list of Canucks propsects that I'm okay moving in a package for upgrades: Jasek Graovac Gadjovich Perron Keppen McDonough Karlsson Costmar Lockwood Palmu Manukyan Malone Plasek Brisebois Teves Chatfield Eliot Sautner Kielly Yep. I am ok with moving any and all C or B prospects as well if we can get a better player. I leave it to JB to figure out. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo5789 Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 11 hours ago, NUCKER67 said: Okay, some thought I made every prospect "untouchable", but hardly. This is the list of Canucks propsects that I'm okay moving in a package for upgrades: Jasek Graovac Gadjovich Perron Keppen McDonough Karlsson Costmar Lockwood Palmu Manukyan Malone Plasek Brisebois Teves Chatfield Eliot Sautner Kielly And what do you expect to get back in return? Would you give up any "upgrade" player for any of these guys currently? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinatcc Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 (edited) On 12/31/2019 at 7:39 AM, Provost said: Strome is also reported to be on the block if NYR stays this far off the playoff pace. Maybe the Oilers could use him Edited January 1, 2020 by iinatcc 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPA Posted January 2, 2020 Share Posted January 2, 2020 On 12/30/2019 at 10:39 PM, Provost said: Strome is also reported to be on the block if NYR stays this far off the playoff pace. Not a lot of teams have space to trade without sending money back... but we should be in on that if they would take a player like Sutter/Baertschi/Eriksson plus they pick/prospect they would want. Read CanucksWay. Interesting proposals surrounding Andersson and OJ. Both prospects less than stellar in their draft years. Perhaps multi player deal? Fast + Andersson for Baertschi + OJ Fast makes less and is UFA next year. Provides some cap relief this year and next if we don't resign him. Andersson may flourish with Canucks (cuz Swedish connections). Baer is a tweener that can be a placeholder while their prospects develop. OJ may do well in NYR and is still a young defenceman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted January 2, 2020 Share Posted January 2, 2020 (edited) On 12/31/2019 at 12:08 PM, NUCKER67 said: Okay, some thought I made every prospect "untouchable", but hardly. This is the list of Canucks propsects that I'm okay moving in a package for upgrades: Jasek Graovac Gadjovich Perron Keppen McDonough Karlsson Costmar Lockwood Palmu Manukyan Malone Plasek Brisebois Teves Chatfield Eliot Sautner Kielly So, basically none of these have any value, every organization is full of similar guys. Our only “untouchable” prospects should be Podkolzin and Hoglander, and they aren’t really untouchable but it would be hard to think of a deal that would bring us something better. Dipietro is tradable as we already have Demko and likely Markstrom locked up for several years. An ideal asset to trade from organizational strength to need. Lind may be a nice bottom six guy as veteran contracts expire, but absolutely replaceable. Madden is prime trade bait, we have our centres locked up and he will have to somehow surpass Podkolzin and Hoglander on the depth chart as a converted winger right at the same time they are going to be competing for roster spots. Juolevi and Woo are harder to give up as our D prospect depth is thin, but they are far from sure things as top 4 D... so if they are traded for an upgrade, no big deal. Folks are ok giving up a 1st rounder for Miller, but balk at sending out later round B and C prospects because “maybe” they will hit. Edited January 2, 2020 by Provost 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanukfanatic Posted January 2, 2020 Share Posted January 2, 2020 47 minutes ago, BPA said: Read CanucksWay. Interesting proposals surrounding Andersson and OJ. Both prospects less than stellar in their draft years. Perhaps multi player deal? Fast + Andersson for Baertschi + OJ Fast makes less and is UFA next year. Provides some cap relief this year and next if we don't resign him. Andersson may flourish with Canucks (cuz Swedish connections). Baer is a tweener that can be a placeholder while their prospects develop. OJ may do well in NYR and is still a young defenceman. No interest at all in that trade. We need D prospects much more than forward ones 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#Canucks Posted January 2, 2020 Share Posted January 2, 2020 43 minutes ago, Provost said: Dipietro is tradable as we already have Demko and likely Markstrom locked up for several years. An ideal asset to trade from organizational strength to need. I can’t see us keeping both Markstrom and Demko past the Seattle expansion. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted January 2, 2020 Share Posted January 2, 2020 1 minute ago, #Canucks said: I can’t see us keeping both Markstrom and Demko past the Seattle expansion. Probably not, it that doesn’t change the fact Demko will just be ready for a starting role and DiPietro will be stuck behind him. We are either protecting Demko or we protect Markstrom and trade Demko before expansion... so we would still be moving one of Demko or DiPietro. No scenario makes it more worthwhile to have “extra” depth in the position if we could change for that for more depth where we need it or a roster upgrade. Two blue chip young goalie prospects is a luxury, we aren’t an organization that can afford luxury because we still have lots of needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzle Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 On 1/1/2020 at 6:27 PM, Provost said: So, basically none of these have any value, every organization is full of similar guys. Our only “untouchable” prospects should be Podkolzin and Hoglander, and they aren’t really untouchable but it would be hard to think of a deal that would bring us something better. Dipietro is tradable as we already have Demko and likely Markstrom locked up for several years. An ideal asset to trade from organizational strength to need. Lind may be a nice bottom six guy as veteran contracts expire, but absolutely replaceable. Madden is prime trade bait, we have our centres locked up and he will have to somehow surpass Podkolzin and Hoglander on the depth chart as a converted winger right at the same time they are going to be competing for roster spots. Juolevi and Woo are harder to give up as our D prospect depth is thin, but they are far from sure things as top 4 D... so if they are traded for an upgrade, no big deal. Folks are ok giving up a 1st rounder for Miller, but balk at sending out later round B and C prospects because “maybe” they will hit. People were incensed that a conditional first rounder were given up. All of them of course ate crow after Miller produced better than originally thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 (edited) On 1/1/2020 at 10:11 PM, #Canucks said: I can’t see us keeping both Markstrom and Demko past the Seattle expansion. The goalie market is so volatile... who knows what will happen. Binnington came out of nowhere. Fleury was supposedly overpaid and on the downhill and Pittsburgh was more than happy to ship him to Vegas to solve cap issues. Price and Bobrovsky have been like a roller coaster the past 5 years. Lehner resurrected his career with the Isles. Who knows where Markstrom and Demko's game will be in 1.5 years. Markstorm numbers have been pretty steady the past few years (ironically slight increase in both GAA and save %), one career-year or a down-year in 2020-21 and the whole landscape will change. I think it's too soon to say what will the goalie market will look like for Seattle. Montreal will also have a big decision. If Cayden Primeau is there go-to guy in the future and are rebuilding, do they leave Price unprotected and make a deal a la Fleury? Edited January 10, 2020 by timberz21 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#Canucks Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 5 hours ago, timberz21 said: The goalie market is so volatile... who knows what will happen. Binnington came out of nowhere. Fleury was supposedly overpaid and on the downhill and Pittsburgh was more than happy to ship him to Vegas to solve cap issues. Price and Bobrovsky have been like a roller coaster the past 5 years. Lehner resurrected his career with the Isles. Who knows where Markstrom and Demko's game will be in 1.5 years. Markstorm numbers have been pretty steady the past few years (ironically slight increase in both GAA and save %), one career-year or a down-year in 2020-21 and the whole landscape will change. I think it's too soon to say what will the goalie market will look like for Seattle. Montreal will also have a big decision. If Cayden Primeau is there go-to guy in the future and are rebuilding, do they leave Price unprotected and make a deal a la Fleury? I agree with everything your saying. Good perspective, great perspective. Tbh I hope Seattle does not take price. Ugh that contract is looking bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 6 hours ago, timberz21 said: I think it's too soon to say what will the goalie market will look like for Seattle. Montreal will also have a big decision. If Cayden Primeau is there go-to guy in the future and are rebuilding, do they leave Price unprotected and make a deal a la Fleury? Price has a NMC, only way he is unprotected is if he waives it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now