Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Trade] Golden Knights trade Nate Schmidt to Canucks for 2022 3rd-round pick


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Timråfan said:

Interesting, the team that beat us get better and heavier while we help them do it by taking the crumbs of their table. 

Pietrangelo is much bigger than Schmidt and produce up to 20 points more.

 

This is more of a desperate move by Benning in my view. He had to do something... I had waited til we could get one of the best. 

I hope Schmidt prove me wrong though. 

Agree 100 percent.   This is another brutal contract.

  • Like 1
  • Cheers 3
  • Wat 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, EddieVedder said:

Hes not top pairing.

Hes 30 yrs old and hes going to eat up 6 mill of our cap until ges 36.  

Im a big believer in Benning, but this was a brutal.

How do you justify not signing Tanev now?

Club is paying for chronic poor drafting of D men about 3-15  years ago.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Wat 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dazzle said:

Come to think of it, that was a status post. Maybe you posted in a thread too, but I'm not sure. All those histories are all gone now. Either way, you should've been banned. Meanwhile Ukrainian Canuck is banned for eternity. And for what?!

I didn't post a thread. I didn't break any rules.

 

It more just sounds like it upsets you when someone else on the discussion forum has a different opinion than you.

 

It's okay, there there.

  • Cheers 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, EddieVedder said:

Vegas was happy to unload that contract.  Benning got taken for a ride here.

So you see Canucks fans all happy and feeling good about a trade and you come in and try and crap all over it? Sad.

 

Take your bad hot takes elsewhere.

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, EddieVedder said:

Hes not top pairing.

Hes 30 yrs old and hes going to eat up 6 mill of our cap until ges 36.  

Im a big believer in Benning, but this was a brutal.

How do you justify not signing Tanev now?

He turned 29 in July and he's eating up our cap till he's 34.

image.thumb.png.aa3254abb618fbf571029bee96b82b17.png

 

 

  • Cheers 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, EddieVedder said:

Hes not top pairing.

Hes 30 yrs old and hes going to eat up 6 mill of our cap until ges 36.  

Im a big believer in Benning, but this was a brutal.

How do you justify not signing Tanev now?

He'll still be 33 when the contract is done (if I did the math correctly looking at Capfriendly).  Most people liked the Edler signing at 6 million and he'll be 35 once his contract expires

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, DeNiro said:

No way anyone can say OJ over Stecher at this point.

 

OJ was considered a bust by many until his one game and now he’s a regular?  I’m hopeful for him but let’s ease expectations. He probably still needs some developing.

Not by anyone who watched Comets games. ..... nor by Benning

 

Sportsnet 650 (@Sportsnet650) Tweeted:
Benning - Juolevi looks like he is ready to play in the NHL full time. https://twitter.com/Sportsnet650/status/1303427339515117568?s=20

 

 

Grrr - I dont know how to link a tweet other than its url

Edited by Googlie
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kanucks25 said:

I didn't post a thread. I didn't break any rules.

 

It more just sounds like it upsets you when someone else on the discussion forum has a different opinion than you.

 

It's okay, there there.

You should've been banned, and you were. Then you squirmed your way back in. You had the intent, so there was really no excuse. It's got nothing to do with a different opinion.

  • Cheers 1
  • Huggy Bear 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember when people thought Benning was done with the offseason already and we were going to be playing Jordie Benn in the top 4?

 

Not only did we add a top 4 dman, he's arguably a top pairing dman. For a 3rd round pick. But wait we traded a draft pick for a cap dump, surely someone's got beef with this as well.

Edited by theo5789
  • Cheers 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MikeyD said:

I completely agree he is an upgrade as he has a two way game, but we need defense. Nate Schmidt isn't good enough defensively to cover the defense we need to have. We literally have no true stay at home defensemen now that we can fully trust. I believe you need two on your team. 

 

For 6 mill and for what he brings I think he's making fair value for open market but the contract could end up being a killer. He's also somewhat injury prone. 

 

Don't get me wrong, I like his game but 6 mill when we just lost 3 important players due to cap is a tough pill to swallow. We got him on the cheap, but he's a big contract to be putting up less than 40 points. Not to mention that's playing with Vegas who is a team that generates off the rush way more effectively than the Canucks. He's got a great outlet pass but when our boys seemingly can't generate a shot on net 50% of the time on a 3 on 1, I just can't see him being nearly as effective. And now we even have less scoring depth. 

 

If I were Benning I'd honestly use Schmidt to offload one of our bad contracts so we can gain some wiggle room. I can't see us coming close to the playoffs this season. Hopefully I'm wrong, but I anticipate a high draft pick next year. 

Realy ! Schmidt will make us better and thats the name of the game. Win more games 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...