Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[proposal] Nucks - Flames


Recommended Posts

We really should not be gutting our future, even if it means adding a star like Matt Tkachuk (who'll probably want what his brother signed for in Ottawa), since we already have a surplus invested into wings as it is (Boeser, Garland, Mikheyev, Pearson, Podkolzin, Kuzmenko are the top-9 guys, plus Hoglander shouldn't be a 4th liner but that's where it looks like he will be as it stands).  Even if Calgary does implode they also probably wouldn't trade their star to a divisional opponent.

That being said, on a much smaller scale, a dream would be to trade Garland for Andersson, who fits the ilk of the solid, all-round RHD who would pair well with Quinn.  Myers for Tanev would be gravy, but no to adding other future assets for another winger.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, KnuckleHead16 said:

Canucks trade 

Connor Garland + Tyler Myers + Jonathan Lekkerimaki + 2023 2nd rd pic + 2023 4th rd pic

 

Flames trade

Mathew Tkachuk + Chris Tanev

 

If we decide to trade Miller, Cause we can’t afford to pay JT’s asking price… we get a 1st round for 2023 draft, and a premium prospect in return. That’s If we’re still planning on high hopes to draft Connor Bedard! and Matvei Michkov! thoughts….

Why would the Canucks mortgage their future for a player that would play tops 2 seasons before going to St. Louis ?

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What could possibly go wrong with bringing in a known locker room cancer?  This would be Messier 2.0.  I wouldn't take that gutless turtle for free, let alone give up valuable assets for a complete disgrace to the sport.

Edited by King Heffy
  • Like 1
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a terrible deal for Calgary. We get their best forward and their best defensive Dman. They get a decent top 6 forward, an okay top 4 D (worse than Tanev), Lekkerimaki who might turn out to be a solid NHL player and a couple middle picks from us. So yeah as Vancouver, I'd say yes but...

 

anyone trading for Matthew should want a full extension agreed on before doing the trade. Van would ask for that and he'd say he won't resign here anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the sake of argument, they'll need a top player, prospect/tertiary player and a 1st.

 

They'll desperately need scoring, have plenty of defence.

 

Boeser + Pearson + 1st would probably get it done. I still wouldn't do it though. Would consider it if it was Garland instead of Boeser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, goog16 said:

NO......

3m5l4s-1808118192.png

Guess he got beaten by his Dad?  Joking aside,  i didn't like WNP back then ... how many times did his bully Dad drop the gloves against Murzyn?   Well think once 3 times in one game ... but would tuck his tail and do this when Gino, Antoski, Hunter or  Momesso was on the ice.  Apple fell a little far from the tree.   Kassian.  Not exactly a "bruiser" ... shamed his shameful family name.   At least Brady is scary like this: the goonies sloth GIF

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, King Heffy said:

What could possibly go wrong with bringing in a known locker room cancer?  This would be Messier 2.0.  I wouldn't take that gutless turtle for free, let alone give up valuable assets for a complete disgrace to the sport.

I would - but then I'd flip him immediately for someone with actual character.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...