Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Elias Pettersson projected to be the runner up for the Selke Trophy

Rate this topic


Elias Pettersson

Recommended Posts

On 4/29/2023 at 12:32 PM, nergish said:

Luongo = Bure = H/D. Sedin = Pettersson = Hughes

 

I don't see how you could argue that any one was/is "better" than the other 

We've been fortunate to see several great players wear Canucks colors over the years...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Baggins said:

Clutch and grab hockey goes way back. Gretzky complained about so much in the early 80's he got the nickname Whine Gretzky. What really changed in the late 90's was the rise in teams employing the trap. Add a lot of clutch and grab to the trap and it stifled offense. One thing that could get through it was speed. Bure had that in spades. Where you really saw the drop in high scoring was the 96/97 season with only 2 players putting up 100+. points down from 12 players the season before.

Without checking, i'm pretty sure the last boffo season where a dozen or so guys scored well over 100 points was 1994.   Federov and Gretzky leading the pack.   Then we had a lockout.   NJ had already gained a ton of traction and SJ adopted their style right away.   Upset Detroit i think twice.   And they were monsters before they finally won a cup, going back to 1993 or so.     Dead puck era had a definitive line as far as scoring drop, and that was 1994.

 

As for Wayne.  It was actually Mario, Roenick and Hull leading the charge about that stuff.    I don't re-call Gretzky ever complaining about anything in the 80's expect he called out NJ Devils once, and called them a joke of a franchise.    For sure he used his eventual stardom to intimidate refs as a tactic though.   Don't remember him getting the moniker "whine Gretzky" for clutch and grab early on in the 80's lol.   And for sure it was a tough rough era he played in back then too. 

 

As for speed.   Go and check out a 17 year vet Gartner when he was the commish'es choice and see what sort of times those guys had.   They had to qualify.   Low 13's.   As whole lot of them and they didn't get to start and then get timed either.   Bure was one of a kind.   Federov was fast too.   Hedican was part of it mid 13's...Selanne.   There were a ton of fast players back then, Bure wasn't just about speed.  He was unique.   Even Messier scored almost 50 goals just before he came to Vancouver.     For me the dead puck era was more than just bad timing for athletes.   That's obvious because as soon as it was lifted guys who were in the mid 30's exploded like Zubov.   Heck Sakic scored over 100 at 37.   And Alfie had his best seasons too.   It was also about lack of emerging talent. 

Edited by IBatch
  • Vintage 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/29/2023 at 11:32 AM, nergish said:

Luongo = Bure = H/D. Sedin = Pettersson = Hughes

 

I don't see how you could argue that any one was/is "better" than the other 

Let's see if those last 2 players can bring a Stanley Cup to Vancouver...Whatever player puts the Canucks on his back and does that for this team gets Legendary status!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, IBatch said:

Without checking, i'm pretty sure the last boffo season where a dozen or so guys scored well over 100 points was 1994.   Federov and Gretzky leading the pack.   Then we had a lockout.   NJ had already gained a ton of traction and SJ adopted their style right away.   Upset Detroit i think twice.   And they were monsters before they finally won a cup, going back to 1993 or so.     Dead puck era had a definitive line as far as scoring drop, and that was 1994.

 

As for Wayne.  It was actually Mario, Roenick and Hull leading the charge about that stuff.    I don't re-call Gretzky ever complaining about anything in the 80's expect he called out NJ Devils once, and called them a joke of a franchise.    For sure he used his eventual stardom to intimidate refs as a tactic though.   Don't remember him getting the moniker "whine Gretzky" for clutch and grab early on in the 80's lol.   And for sure it was a tough rough era he played in back then too. 

 

As for speed.   Go and check out a 17 year vet Gartner when he was the commish'es choice and see what sort of times those guys had.   They had to qualify.   Low 13's.   As whole lot of them and they didn't get to start and then get timed either.   Bure was one of a kind.   Federov was fast too.   Hedican was part of it mid 13's...Selanne.   There were a ton of fast players back then, Bure wasn't just about speed.  He was unique.   Even Messier scored almost 50 goals just before he came to Vancouver.     For me the dead puck era was more than just bad timing for athletes.   That's obvious because as soon as it was lifted guys who were in the mid 30's exploded like Zubov.   Heck Sakic scored over 100 at 37.   And Alfie had his best seasons too.   It was also about lack of emerging talent. 

Could contain: Text

 

I was a father of two when Gretzky came in the league. Believe me, he got the "Whine" Gretzky nickname because he complained so much about getting hooked and grabbed. That was years before Mario was drafted.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Baggins said:

Could contain: Text

 

I was a father of two when Gretzky came in the league. Believe me, he got the "Whine" Gretzky nickname because he complained so much about getting hooked and grabbed. That was years before Mario was drafted.

Scoring had been trending down since 1992-1993...  No debate the game was grabby back then too (80's), but not as grabby as it became.   Semenko at least kept him from getting clocked (although players did try, was hard to hit)  Sather - "hitting Gretz is like trying to hit smoke"  etc.   When Mario was out, Jagr's points usually took a hit.    Compare that to this, hard to fit all the scoring on one page lol...and it had been like that since the late 70's...81 was actually the peak. 

 

Respect to you old timer - your right 95/96 was still a year where guys got their points ... Mario left.   Jagr did keep it up, but never reached those heights again.   

Could contain: Text, Page, Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone, Number, Symbol

Edited by IBatch
  • Like 1
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, IBatch said:

Scoring had been trending down since 1992-1993...  No debate the game was grabby back then too (80's), but not as grabby as it became.   Semenko at least kept him from getting clocked (although players did try, was hard to hit)  Sather - "hitting Gretz is like trying to hit smoke"  etc.   When Mario was out, Jagr's points usually took a hit.    Compare that to this, hard to fit all the scoring on one page lol...and it had been like that since the late 70's...81 was actually the peak. 

 

 

Could contain: Text, Page, Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone, Number, Symbol

 

That was a fun season to watch.  They made a pretty good video game for the PC with the stats from that season as well.  Damn Cliff Ronning couldn't stay on his feet if anyone touched him...they gave him the attributes of a housefly.  Al MacInnis could break Gretzky's 92 goal season with PPG alone if you put him on the wing on the PP for one timers.

 

A lot of asterisks on that scoring chart.  Should be a few more as well like Mogilny, Turgeon, Roenick and Fleury...and coach Tocchet is a hell of a lot closer to a Hall of Famer than most people think.

 

Kevin Stevens...suffers from Charlie Simmer / Rick Martin / Tim Kerr syndrome I guess.  An absolute legend for a handful of seasons but didn't do it for long enough.

 

Edited by Kevin Biestra
  • Cheers 1
  • Vintage 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Kevin Biestra said:

 

That was a fun season to watch.  They made a pretty good video game for the PC with the stats from that season as well.  Damn Cliff Ronning couldn't stay on his feet if anyone touched him...they gave him the attributes of a housefly.  Al MacInnis could break Gretzky's 92 goal season with PPG alone if you put him on the wing on the PP for one timers.

 

A lot of asterisks on that scoring chart.  Should be a few more as well like Mogilny, Turgeon, Roenick and Fleury...and coach Tocchet is a hell of a lot closer to a Hall of Famer than most people think.

 

Kevin Stevens...suffers from Charlie Simmer / Rick Martin / Tim Kerr syndrome I guess.  An absolute legend for a handful of seasons but didn't do it for long enough.

 

Different stick technology then too. A player had to actually have the wrist strength and skill to shoot the puck. Now every player uses a super special stick, that flexes perfectly for them, so the can shoot hard and accurate. 

  • Cheers 1
  • Vintage 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Alflives said:

Different stick technology then too. A player had to actually have the wrist strength and skill to shoot the puck. Now every player uses a super special stick, that flexes perfectly for them, so the can shoot hard and accurate. 

You bet... Al Mac and Al Ifrate, Wilson ... could murder that puck with wood...Some guys like Al Mac never changed into the hybrids which had more flex ... Wendel Clark breaking masks with his wrister using a wood stick, Bret Hull it took some forearm man strength for sure.    

 

Weber and Chara could sure murder them pucks too.   Webers sometimes broke mesh - once went through the end boards through the net in practice. 

Edited by IBatch
  • Cheers 1
  • Vintage 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, IBatch said:

You bet... Al Mac and Al Ifrate, Wilson ... could murder that puck with wood...Some guys like Al Mac never changed into the hybrids which had more flex ... Wendel Clark breaking masks with his wrister using a wood stick, Bret Hull it took some forearm man strength for sure.    

 

Weber and Chara could sure murder them pucks too.   Webers sometimes broke mesh - once went through the end boards through the net in practice. 

It was rare to see a great wrist shot with a wooden stick. Lanny was one who could fire a wrister.  But mostly there was some take back to get enough force into the ice to flex the stick, so it took time. Now these sticks are way too forgiving. The league should have stayed with wood like baseball did with the bat. 

  • Cheers 2
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recall an interview with Brett Hull and he was asked if he used a 100 or 110 flex stick ( which was pretty common in those days ) and Brett laughed and said heck no I use a 65 :lol: It was a time when i was trying to have my children look at a lower flex. Often D'men used a 100 flex at that time ( slap shots and cross checking LOL ) Times have chnaged ad the speed of the game makes it less likely to take a slap shot today, you simply rarely get the time

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, N7Nucks said:

If he's a runner up playing on a team with the 9th worst GA in the league and the league worst PK. I dunno man. Seems like fan service to suggest he even belongs in the convo. I get it's a team game, but if you are the 2nd best defensive forward in the league, it should have some effect on team success.

 

20 hours ago, Kevin Biestra said:

 

I would say it probably did have an effect on team success.  He prevented the team from being much much worse.  Players are already disqualified from the Hart Trophy if their team doesn't make the playoffs and I've been against that for years...but I think the DQs should stop there.  Pettersson led the league in shorthanded goals and somehow was a +16 on a team with a -22 goal differential.  Honestly it is quite impressive that he and Hughes managed a +16 and a +15 under their circumstances.

Pettersson's metrics absolutely show that his defensive contributions helped the team in a big way.  It's just that there are other players with better metrics.  Yes, part of the reason for that is because they played for better teams.  Bergeron wouldn't win Selke trophies if he played for Arizona, but that's just life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Alflives said:

It was rare to see a great wrist shot with a wooden stick. Lanny was one who could fire a wrister.  But mostly there was some take back to get enough force into the ice to flex the stick, so it took time. Now these sticks are way too forgiving. The league should have stayed with wood like baseball did with the bat. 

Now it’s a crazy world out there, bought a Bauer Nexus with the Joe Sakic curve on it off a friend of mine cheap… I might be senile but I’m pretty sure I can shoot a puck better now at 62 than I ever could before!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...