Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Rumour] Canucks poking on Pesce


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Provost said:

He would be a good pick up, but how on earth do you afford raises for him, Petterson, and Hronek next season?  
 

Pesce > Hronek to me, although Carolina is a good enough team that Jalen Chatfield looks really good.

 

 

Only way Pesce is in, is if Myers is out

 

Which would be HUGE if true

 

then we go get Cole for the penalty kill & to be Hronek's partner

 

Hughes-Pesce

Cole-Hronek

Wolanin-Whocares

 

Just imagine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nicklas Bo Hunter said:

Not really sure what we could offer tbh. 

 

1st is automatic.

 

Likely could use a cheaper scoring winger so beauviller would be in the deal.

 

Maybe beauviller + raty + 2024 1st

 

But we would have to be sure that we were contending. 

Bleh if we have to give up Raty + a 1st, pass. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pears said:

Pesce is my dream for this offseason. Get him and one of Graves or Soucy and we’re cookin’. 

I just don’t see the trade fit and if any team could go for him it’s buffalo

 

have more assets then us to trade.

 

having Miller on his new salary, signing hronek  and extending petey be really tough to fit him in cap wise.

 

im wondering how he’s going to age too or if he will decline like parayko.

 

I just don’t think we have 1 the asset package to make the acquisition and 2 the cap space for him when he needs to be resigned and 3 scared how it will age 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Elias Pettersson said:

He'll be 30 when he signs his 7-8 year deal.  He's getting $6 million+.  Hronek at $7 million+.  Hughes at $10 million+ plus in 4 years.  Where is the money coming from to fit all these guys?  And where is Willander going to play, on the 3rd pairing?  Why bother drafting a stud RHD who projects as a top pairing guy if you are just going to overpay for a 30 year old in free agency?

 

If we were actually going to trade for Pesce, we should have drafted Matthew Wood instead...

well considering they did sign Miller to a 7 year deal at the age of 30 i wouldn't put it past them.. and i don't think it's a bad thing for willander to start off on the 3rd pairing and slowly move his way up if he's capable.. although for a defenceman at that age i prolly go no more than max 5 years not sure if he would though.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, eeeeergh said:

Only way Pesce is in, is if Myers is out

 

Which would be HUGE if true

 

then we go get Cole for the penalty kill & to be Hronek's partner

 

Hughes-Pesce

Cole-Hronek

Wolanin-Whocares

 

Just imagine

… or we have to downgrade at forward.  
Miller+ for Kotkaniemi and Pesce.  We suddenly have a really solid D for the first time in a decade though.  That would count as major surgery.

 

Carolina and Miller would be a great fit.

 

Myers going doesn’t even do it as we would still be in a huge cap crunch next season.  Petterson, Pesce, and Hronek are going to cost in the $25+ million range.

Edited by Provost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Provost said:

… or we have to downgrade at forward.  
Miller+ for Kotkaniemi and Pesce

 

Carolina and Miller would be a great fit.

 

Myers going doesn’t even do it as we would still be in a huge cap crunch next season.  Petterson, Pesce, and Hronek are going to cost in the $25+ million range.

i dont think our guys are gonna trade Miller

 

seems like theyd trade 1 impossible task for the other

 

get a top pair RD (which they already believe they did in Hronek) but lose their 90 point 2C.. i dont see it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Provost said:

… or we have to downgrade at forward.  
Miller+ for Kotkaniemi and Pesce

 

Carolina and Miller would be a great fit.

 

Myers going doesn’t even do it as we would still be in a huge cap crunch next season.  Petterson, Pesce, and Hronek are going to cost in the $25+ million range.

i mean it's not even that bad 25+ still have around 12-13 for 9 majority of them are bottom 6 league min players i dont see podz getting much of a raise maybe 1.5mil and if they can manage to move a boeser or garland then we'd have plenty of cap space moving miller for pesce makes no sense because they are almost the same age and put a gigantic hole in the middle KK is at best a 3c moved horvat moving miller and prolly moving on from boeser either trade or runs out contract.. who's playing in the top 6?? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, EddieVedder said:

Ill take tanev.  Tanev has that x factor and is low maintenance.   I find these american players way too high maintenence.  

Tanev would be perfect for us if we can get him back for cheap. Only 1 year left at an affordable price. Hughes loved him and he would fit right in at a low short term cap hit.

  • Wat 1
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrJockitch said:

Right now if Klimovich and Raty are going to work out it looks like around the time OEL penalty balloons. Around that time we should be seeing Lekk and probably Willander sniffing around the NHL team. Silovs will have had some NHL experience by then. Lots of options coming for cost controlled players and cap will be climbing. 
A few contracts come off, Brock will be off books, Garland in three. 
We need to see what we will be paying Hronek and EP.  There is some money to spend but nothing crazy. 

I agree. I hope to see both Willander and Lekkerimaki in 2 years. Klimovich and Raty well. And Silovs. 
 

Willander and Hronek will be our top 4 RHD guys. We need a lefty to complete the top 4. Not sure the fake Petey is the answer. We need a real solid defensive defenceman. If Silovs is ready to be the #1 then we could trade Demko before he’s a UFA. 
 

I think we got most of our talent in place now. We just need to find some sandpaper guys and some defensive specialists to complete the roster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Provost said:

… or we have to downgrade at forward.  
Miller+ for Kotkaniemi and Pesce.  We suddenly have a really solid D for the first time in a decade though.  That would count as major surgery.

 

Carolina and Miller would be a great fit.

 

Myers going doesn’t even do it as we would still be in a huge cap crunch next season.  Petterson, Pesce, and Hronek are going to cost in the $25+ million range.

That trade would have to happen in the next 28 hours or Miller will be a Canuck for at least the next 4 years. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pesce is the perfect partner for Quinn BUT he’ll come in at 6.5m x 8 years at 29 years of age and that’s a similar deal hronek is going to get 

 

be careful what you wish for…

 

hughes-pesce 

soucy-hronek 

 

that’s pretty sick doe 

 

You Know Reaction GIF by MOODMAN

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, babalu said:

Tanev would be perfect for us if we can get him back for cheap. Only 1 year left at an affordable price. Hughes loved him and he would fit right in at a low short term cap hit.

I like acquiring Tanev for the coming season and seeing how he does healthwise.  Wallinder is likely 2-3yrs away

and even then, he may not be able to step into the Quinn's partner role.  If Tanev fits in well for next season, they

could and another 2yrs.

 

I don't mind losing the 1st for Pesce; he's a decent partner for Hughes, but I don't like the term.  7/8 yrs along with

the same for Hronek could end up being a huge liability for the team in the future.  I don't think Quinn needs a costly

shut down dman for a partner.  He is that good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as much as I’d love to see what Hughes can do with a legit partner, one of his superpowers is playing great with a complimentary (less expensive) partner. IMHO, we’re not in a position to not take advantage of that.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, higgyfan said:

I like acquiring Tanev for the coming season and seeing how he does healthwise.  Wallinder is likely 2-3yrs away

and even then, he may not be able to step into the Quinn's partner role.  If Tanev fits in well for next season, they

could add another 2yrs.

 

I don't mind losing the 1st for Pesce; he's a decent partner for Hughes, but I don't like the term.  7/8 yrs along with

the same for Hronek could end up being a huge liability for the team in the future.  I don't think Quinn needs a costly

shut down dman for a partner.  He is that good.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, billabong said:

Pesce is the perfect partner for Quinn BUT he’ll come in at 6.5m x 8 years at 29 years of age and that’s a similar deal hronek is going to get 

 

be careful what you wish for…

 

hughes-pesce 

soucy-hronek 

 

that’s pretty sick doe 

 

You Know Reaction GIF by MOODMAN

I rather get a stop gap personally. Signing Schenn for 2 years or acquiring Tanev if he becomes available. I would imagine Tanev could be had for a 2nd in 2025. 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KKnight said:

I rather get a stop gap personally. Signing Schenn for 2 years or acquiring Tanev if he becomes available. I would imagine Tanev could be had for a 2nd in 2025. 

Same here. Willander should be ready at the end of 24/25… Schenn for 2-3 years at a low salary fits perfectly.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No to Pesce. Too old to give up premium assets for. We already have Hronek who we will be signing long term and Willander will be here in 2 years. I'd rather sign a couple UFA Dmen to 2-3 year contracts as stop gaps.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...