grandmaster Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 I don’t get all the posters with their trade ideas for this guy. He is not worth a 1st next year plus like so many saying. Is he? His db stats don’t seem that impressive for this kind of ask! Mind you, I have never seen him play 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EddieVedder Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 39 minutes ago, BC_Hawk said: Yes, with drafting Willander, sign Schenn for 2 years and Graves for 4/5 years would be ideal. Following defense wouldn’t be all that bad for 23/24: Hughes-Schenn Graves-Hronek Hiriose/Bris/Burroughs/etc-Myers Graves over pesce. You just know pesce isnt going to want to play in canada and want to bolt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EddieVedder Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 5 minutes ago, grandmaster said: I don’t get all the posters with their trade ideas for this guy. He is not worth a 1st next year plus like so many saying. Is he? His db stats don’t seem that impressive for this kind of ask! Mind you, I have never seen him play Hes a good dman, but we would be severely overpaying. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EddieVedder Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 21 minutes ago, aGENT said: He's like a bigger, more physical Tanev, with a bit more offense. Other than having some miles on him he's pretty bang on IMO. Ill take tanev. Tanev has that x factor and is low maintenance. I find these american players way too high maintenence. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlwaysACanuckFan Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 2 hours ago, 6of1_halfdozenofother said: Poking around for moar D? Allvin hunting for moar D 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wai_lai416 Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 16 minutes ago, grandmaster said: I don’t get all the posters with their trade ideas for this guy. He is not worth a 1st next year plus like so many saying. Is he? His db stats don’t seem that impressive for this kind of ask! Mind you, I have never seen him play so a legit top 4 defenceman that only cost 4mil on ur cap this year can put up point 5v5 blocks a ton of shots is worth no more than a 1st?? sign me up we can trade a couple of 1st and get couple of top 4 defenceman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5nothincanucksohno Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 21 minutes ago, grandmaster said: I don’t get all the posters with their trade ideas for this guy. He is not worth a 1st next year plus like so many saying. Is he? His db stats don’t seem that impressive for this kind of ask! Mind you, I have never seen him play Plus he is a UFA after next season...let's deal with Hronek first and see where that negotiation lands 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grandmaster Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 1 minute ago, wai_lai416 said: so a legit top 4 defenceman that only cost 4mil on ur cap this year can put up point 5v5 blocks a ton of shots is worth no more than a 1st?? sign me up we can trade a couple of 1st and get couple of top 4 defenceman Hronek cost us only a 1st and a 2nd. From what I see, Hronek seems better. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strawbone Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 We really can’t afford to overpay anyone in the next few years. That means passing on a lot of players that would help the team but at too high a cost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wai_lai416 Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 2 minutes ago, grandmaster said: Hronek cost us only a 1st and a 2nd. From what I see, Hronek seems better. lol in what sense? Pesce have been consistently a top pairing defenceman for 5+ seasons now.. Hronek without top unit powerplay time he'll prolly be around a 35-40 point guy.. Pesce is a 30 point guy as most of his points are from 5v5.. and he's wayyyyy better defensively and it's not even close. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 8 minutes ago, grandmaster said: Hronek cost us only a 1st and a 2nd. From what I see, Hronek seems better. Pesce is the better defenseman without a doubt. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maddogy Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 7 minutes ago, grandmaster said: Hronek cost us only a 1st and a 2nd. From what I see, Hronek seems better. Pesce is clearly better than Hronek, however he will be 29 later this year and he played for a defensive juggernaut. Hronek took on a big role for a leaky Detroit team. I don’t think P.A. will overpay for 29 years old Pesce. If he is 25 years old then P.A. will definitely over pay. I just don’t see Canucks will come away with Pesce considering the list of contending teams going all in this year. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 2 hours ago, Citizen Erased said: I would throw in the rights to Patrick White or Taylor Ellington too. Yann Sauve is off limits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
combover Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 (edited) Would be good but. Ufa after next season what’s an extension look like for him. does he want to resign or test ufa status. hroneks due for a raise to Edited June 30 by combover Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 (edited) 1 hour ago, NUCKER67 said: He turns 29 in November. Not old. Canucks need more physicality on the back end. He'll be 30 when he signs his 7-8 year deal. He's getting $6 million+. Hronek at $7 million+. Hughes at $10 million+ plus in 4 years. Where is the money coming from to fit all these guys? And where is Willander going to play, on the 3rd pairing? Why bother drafting a stud RHD who projects as a top pairing guy if you are just going to overpay for a 30 year old in free agency? If we were actually going to trade for Pesce, we should have drafted Matthew Wood instead... Edited June 30 by Elias Pettersson 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeBossy Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 53 minutes ago, EddieVedder said: Ill take tanev. Tanev has that x factor and is low maintenance. I find these american players way too high maintenence. Was thinking the exact same thing - Calgary is a tire fire right now let's go get him! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrJockitch Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 7 minutes ago, Elias Pettersson said: He'll be 30 when he signs his 7-8 year deal. He's getting $6 million+. Hronek at $7 million+. Hughes at $10 million+ plus in 4 years. Where is the money coming from to fit all these guys? And where is Willander going to play, on the 3rd pairing? Why bother drafting a stud RHD who projects as a top pairing guy if you are just going to overpay for a 30 year old in free agency? If we were actually going to trade for Pesce, we should have drafted Matthew Wood instead... Right now if Klimovich and Raty are going to work out it looks like around the time OEL penalty balloons. Around that time we should be seeing Lekk and probably Willander sniffing around the NHL team. Silovs will have had some NHL experience by then. Lots of options coming for cost controlled players and cap will be climbing. A few contracts come off, Brock will be off books, Garland in three. We need to see what we will be paying Hronek and EP. There is some money to spend but nothing crazy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rabbit Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 I doubt to sign him 7-8 years with $6M at his age of 29/30. How about 3-4 years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPA Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 Canucks just bought out OEL. Let that sink in for a minute please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks-12 Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 2 minutes ago, BPA said: Canucks just bought out OEL. Let that sink in for a minute please. Nothing to let sink it. Was a good decision. Had to clean up previous GM’s decision one way or another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now