Odd. Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 I’d much rather sign him in FA next season then to give up assets. Also I’m not really high on Pesce who is already kind heading towards the downswing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 In any Pesce trade I’d expect Carolina to want to immediate help with scoring beau, hoglander or podz, 1st pick 2024 (unprotected) only moving that pick if we are going for the playoffs so making it unprotected doesn’t matter as it’ll fall around the 18th pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 38 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said: Left d sure. They're deeper at ld, for sure, but it's not that difficult to move someone over. Hughes should over, imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 1 minute ago, stawns said: They're deeper at ld, for sure, but it's not that difficult to move someone over. Hughes should over, imo. I'd prefer that as a last resort myself, C can be replenished through the next couple drafts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 It all comes down to what kinda money he’s asking for. Anything around 6 then sure. Anything over 7 and there’s no way. Way too much risk it turns into a Vlasic like contract. No D man should be making over 7 unless they’re putting up 50+ points and playing in all situations. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strawbone Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 1 hour ago, Coconuts said: Do you actually own a hat or is this an empty incentive? I sure do! 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RakuRaku Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 And..... how's the poking progress so far??? As you know, aimless poking without any happy ending is just harassment!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby James Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 Yeah as said above I feel like the Canucks should only entertain this trade option if Pesce is happy to resign here and Van is good with the money. Otherwise we definitely should not be giving up another 1st round pick and a solid prospect on such a big risk. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 1st and Hogs for Pesce. Maybe we can extend him. Who doesn't wanna play with Hughes? Myers with some sort of retention for cap reasons and cause they still wanna ice a complete team. Can we do a conditional 2nd and it becomes a 1st if we make the playoffs? I dunno how the conditions work anymore. Either way, we are in F them picks mode, been there for more than 10 years. If our goal is to make ownership and Petey happy with playoffs at any means then we really shouldn't be against moving more picks. Gamble our entire future on both Lekkerimaki and Willander meeting/exceeding expectations. Go from there. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Canuck #12 Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 2 hours ago, Strawbone said: I sure do! Not to mention owning one heckuva dreamy smile!! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted Lasso Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 58 minutes ago, JeremyCuddles said: 1st and Hogs for Pesce. Maybe we can extend him. Who doesn't wanna play with Hughes? Myers with some sort of retention for cap reasons and cause they still wanna ice a complete team. Can we do a conditional 2nd and it becomes a 1st if we make the playoffs? I dunno how the conditions work anymore. Either way, we are in F them picks mode, been there for more than 10 years. If our goal is to make ownership and Petey happy with playoffs at any means then we really shouldn't be against moving more picks. Gamble our entire future on both Lekkerimaki and Willander meeting/exceeding expectations. Go from there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 1 hour ago, Captain Canuck #12 said: Not to mention owning one heckuva dreamy smile!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 1 hour ago, JeremyCuddles said: 1st and Hogs for Pesce. Maybe we can extend him. Who doesn't wanna play with Hughes? Myers with some sort of retention for cap reasons and cause they still wanna ice a complete team. Can we do a conditional 2nd and it becomes a 1st if we make the playoffs? I dunno how the conditions work anymore. Either way, we are in F them picks mode, been there for more than 10 years. If our goal is to make ownership and Petey happy with playoffs at any means then we really shouldn't be against moving more picks. Gamble our entire future on both Lekkerimaki and Willander meeting/exceeding expectations. Go from there. I agree with this. The first + is up for grabs for the right dman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted Lasso Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 18 minutes ago, rekker said: I agree with this. The first + is up for grabs for the right dman. Would you put an age, cap or term limit on that? PA said we won’t be trading a 1st for a 30year old player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted Lasso Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 Love the idea of giving Hughes a top shutdown partner, but if we’re giving a 1st for 29 y/o Pesce, I’d hope to see a reasonable extension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 5 hours ago, canuck73_3 said: I never said 2C, better off drafting that 3C is a current need. We're not getting a 3C for them either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 4 minutes ago, aGENT said: We're not getting a 3C for them either. What about a gnome for gnome deal with Lou Lam? Or is he a feared to deal with Allvin after getting worked over so badly with the Horfat Wallet trade? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 7 minutes ago, aGENT said: We're not getting a 3C for them either. I disagree entirely. Beauvilier or Myers are easily worth a 3C 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 3 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said: I disagree entirely. Beauvilier or Myers are easily worth a 3C OK. Who do you propose we target for this young, "developing 3C"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrJockitch Posted September 14, 2023 Share Posted September 14, 2023 I am not sure we can afford another high end top 4 D. Pettey is going to get paid big time and we will need to pay Hronek. OEL penalty kicks in 2 years for a couple more years before becoming manageable. There is a reason we only signed one player for more than 2 years this off-season. Our D would potentially be one of the better setups in the league with good size and puck moving with him but this is a pipe dream. Though never say never with trader Jim around. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now