orcasgonewild Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 So today I was kinda bored so I was reading some articles. Apparently Avs wanna build their team around MacKinnon and are open to shopping Barrie and duchene. I'll make a possible trade, and as always tell me what u think... To Avs Edler Hansen Sutter (retain 30%) 2nd To canucks Duchene Barrie If trade is done: Lineups Rodin duchene Eriksson Sedins burrows Baertschi horvat granlund Dorsett Chaput skille Tanev Barrie Hutton Gudbranson Tryamkin/sbisa stecher Expansion draft Sedins Eriksson Duchene Horvat Baertschi Granlund Tanev Barrie Gudbranson Expose sbisa since he's actually playing good now I don't see how las vegas doesn't take him Next year's lineup Rodin duchene boeser Baertschi horvat granlund Sedins Eriksson Dorsett gaunce burrows Barrie Tanev Tryamkin stecher Hutton guddy Markstrom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Jay 22 Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 Sounds good. Why don't you go over to the Avs board and see what they think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 If the Avs wants to build around MacKinnon, they won't trade two of their biggest bargaining chip for older players. They will trade them for picks, prospects or young NHLer with lots of potential, making the Canucks an unlikely trading partners. The Avs best option to maximize the return on these players is to trade them to Cup Contenders and gets 1st picks and young players in return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odjick_fan Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 Sbisa, Grenier and Torts 2nd? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orcasgonewild Posted December 22, 2016 Author Share Posted December 22, 2016 1 hour ago, Odjick_fan said: Sbisa, Grenier and Torts 2nd? Why hasn't JB offered this yet!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 2 hours ago, orcasgonewild said: To Avs Edler Hansen Sutter (retain 30%) 2nd That alone wouldn't get you Duchene. Quantity doesn't equal quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Money Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 If you want Duchesne, it will cost Horvat or Boeser. If you want Barrie, it will cost Hutton+ or Stetcher++. Forget about it. We need to draft and develop our own Duchesne/Barrie-types. That's the only way to acquire them without it being essentially a lateral move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 I think Stecher makes Barrie a bit obsolete. Barrie is listed at 5-10 190 (maybe soaking wet, after a big steak) so he's a bit bigger than Stecher but not appreciably and Stecher seems to be developing a similar style. If you're talking Tanev, Torts 2nd for Landeskog then that might be something to go for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 4 hours ago, orcasgonewild said: To Avs Edler Hansen Sutter (retain 30%) 2nd Edler waives for one of the worst teams in the league for what reason exactly? I wish people would make at least an attempt at making reasonable proposals keeping in mind guys with NTC/NMC hold the leverage and JB has said publicly several times he's not approaching them to move. Edler to a great team with a legitimate chance of winning makes at least some sense. Edler waiving for a bottom feeder - not so much. If anything, Tanev for GL is more realistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 2 hours ago, Monty said: That alone wouldn't get you Duchene. Quantity doesn't equal quality. Are you serious? I read this and felt this: Sutter + the Torts second for Duchene is very fair. The Avs have been horrible since losing ROR. Sutter could fill that need. That means Edler for Barrie. Seems like another fair deal. Alf gives TWO THUMBS UP TO THIS VERY FAIR TRADE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklehead44 Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 We could probably pickup Soderberg for minimal exchange of assets (given his contract and current season production) to play centre with Eriksson. We have Granlund and Sutter playing a lot of wing. They were effective together in Boston and are close friends. Some snippets from various headlines and articles below:http://nesn.com/2015/09/loui-eriksson-of-course-was-sad-to-see-carl-soderberg-leave-bruins/ "Soderberg, Eriksson Impress in First Year with B's" "Eriksson was such a driving force on the B’s third line with Carl Soderberg and Chris Kelly. And it was pretty funny to hear the argument flip from ‘Eriksson can’t produce without Soderberg’ to ‘Wow, Eriksson really brings the best out of Soderberg’. Eriksson drove possession like a first-liner, and produced like a second-liner. On the third line. He’s good." "At even strength, Soderberg and Eriksson were the second-most reliable offensive pairing after Bergeron and Brad Marchand." "the line of Kelly, Soderberg, and Loui Eriksson has been the best trio on the ice for the Bruins thanks to their chemistry and ability to control play in all three zones" "With Carl Soderberg gone, what will Bruins do with Loui Eriksson?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aircool Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 So many hockey experts here who can't spell Duchene.. .LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlanB Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 5 hours ago, Fanuck said: Edler waives for one of the worst teams in the league for what reason exactly? I wish people would make at least an attempt at making reasonable proposals keeping in mind guys with NTC/NMC hold the leverage and JB has said publicly several times he's not approaching them to move. Edler to a great team with a legitimate chance of winning makes at least some sense. Edler waiving for a bottom feeder - not so much. ^ This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 That line up though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knucklehead85 Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 9 hours ago, Aircool said: So many hockey experts here who can't spell Duchene.. .LOL Do Shane am I doing this right lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixon Ward Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 I would take Duchene, Landeskog, Barrie, Mackinnon, and Rantanen. That is about it from that team. We need elite skill. We don't need to be trading prospects or young players for 3rd liners who are 30 like Soderberg. I would not give up everything, but I would strongly consider trades for those guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Jay 22 Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 17 hours ago, Alflives said: Are you serious? I read this and felt this: Sutter + the Torts second for Duchene is very fair. The Avs have been horrible since losing ROR. Sutter could fill that need. That means Edler for Barrie. Seems like another fair deal. Alf gives TWO THUMBS UP TO THIS VERY FAIR TRADE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldoescobar Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 18 hours ago, Alflives said: Are you serious? I read this and felt this: Sutter + the Torts second for Duchene is very fair. The Avs have been horrible since losing ROR. Sutter could fill that need. That means Edler for Barrie. Seems like another fair deal. Alf gives TWO THUMBS UP TO THIS VERY FAIR TRADE. Monty's correct on this one Alf... Duchene >>>>>>>>>>> Sutter Barrie>> Edler (at this point in his career) I love the nucks but outside of Horvat/Tanev a few of our prospects and maybe Miller to a team desperate for goal tending (that he would waive to) our players are worth little to nothing to other teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGuardian_ Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 It is the thought that count's right? Benning gave Sutter a NTC so he isn't going anywhere. Edler already has one, so he here unless he decides to go to a top team. Tanev, Gubranson, Sven, Sven, Sven get what you can for him while they can, Hansen, Horvat, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.