VegasCanuck Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 Tanev would really improve a lot of bluelines out there, and teams seem to be willing to generally overpay for top 4 D right now. Since we will likely lose a D in the expansion draft anyway, if there's a solid deal out there, I'd say go for it! His value is not likely, ever going to be higher than it is right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush17 Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 15 hours ago, S'all Good Man said: holy cow. Pettersson may be Jims guy. I'm actually ok with that, the scouting reports are pretty darn good and I like that he and Dahlen have had good chemistry. I didn't even know they were allowed to do that. inviting players to your town. now that's interesting:) I really like Pettersson so no complaints on my end necas is pretty dope too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 I still think Tanev to ARZ makes the most sense. Either for their 7th (+?) or solid prospect + their 23rd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 Exact same thing with Larsson, just sayin'. They had little interest in moving him unless it was for a lot. I'm not saying he gets us a Hall-like talent but this is definitely a bargaining tool to maximize value. Or more than likely they legitimately don't want to move him unless it's for a Hall-like talent. Stay competitive and all that. We'll soon see. Dallas better pony up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 8 hours ago, Me_ said: VAN 1OA NJ 3OA 5OA DAL Tanev GOLDOBIN - PATRICK - BOESER BAERTSCHI - HORVAT - VIRTANEN Wtf...why. The 3rd AND 5th are better by far fir this club than the 1st representing a player who by all accounts might not be the best in this draft let alone the top ten Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuck1991 Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 10 minutes ago, J.R. said: I still think Tanev to ARZ makes the most sense. Either for their 7th (+?) or solid prospect + their 23rd. yes i mentioned it before in proposals. dylan strome and 23rd mayb? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 5 hours ago, Me_ said: VAN 1OA Hall NJ Tanev Baertschi 5OA Stop...please... As for 1st overall picks busting being rare. Hall RNH Yakupov For their draft positions....they're incredible disappointments Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 4 minutes ago, Warhippy said: Wtf...why. The 3rd AND 5th are better by far fir this club than the 1st representing a player who by all accounts might not be the best in this draft let alone the top ten Agreed. How about we take Vilardi and Makar with 3 and 5? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 2 minutes ago, Alflives said: Agreed. How about we take Vilardi and Makar with 3 and 5? Yes please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 1 hour ago, J.R. said: I still think Tanev to ARZ makes the most sense. Either for their 7th (+?) or solid prospect + their 23rd. Per Kypreos on Sportsnet during game #3 - Arizona is now willing to move Mike Smith. He wants to win now and they want to go much younger. If that's the direction they are heading Tanev is probably not a D they would be targeting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 1 minute ago, mll said: Per Kypreos on Sportsnet during game #3 - Arizona is now willing to move Mike Smith. He wants to win now and they want to go much younger. If that's the direction they are heading Tanev is probably not a D they would be targeting. I guess they're trading OEL then too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honky Cat Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 2 hours ago, Rush17 said: Tanev for TOR's: 18th OA, Kapanen, and a 3rd plus will give them a bag of pucks lpl. I'm honestly not all that enamored with Kapanen but a similar value player be perfect-o! watch it be JVR or Nylander lllol + a 3rd I'm not enamoured with him either..so why trade for him..?...We're down at the knees with young undersized forwards (Dahlen,Goldoblin,Boucher,Baertschi,Granlund).. If we're not getting precisely what we need for Tanev..we don't need to trade him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missioncanucksfan Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 8 hours ago, Wolfgang Durst said: I like your idea of getting an replacement for Tanev with Honka in the same deal. I think that the Canucks need to include another asset into the package to get this deal done. Maybe taking on a bad contract for Niemi and or Lehtonen balance it out. Another option would be to add a right winger from our roster to the package. Canucks are deep at right wing, hence it would not significantly impair Canucks forwards group. Another option would be: To VAN: #3 and #29 To Dallas: Tanev According to the information on Mark Easson's NHL trade rumors JB is thinking about packaging #33 and #55 to get another first round pick. If the Canucks get the #29 from Dallas would enable us to keep #33 and #55. It's a matter of negotiating at the end of the day. Cart freaking wheels if we get both 3 and 29 and keep 33/55. Benning wins the best GM to make the best splash at the draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missioncanucksfan Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 20 hours ago, janisahockeynut said: One of these is not like the others............ If I was ranking them by strength of offer...........it would be Dallas.........3rd + Honka..................................If we got this on, there would be dancing in the streets Buffalo........8th + good prospect......................I would take the 8th plus A. Nylander........add Baertschi Montreal.....Galchenyuk +................................No way Montreal does this....no way TB..............1st + Howden or Raddysh.............I would consider this (Barely) Tor.............1st + Neilsen or Dermott................Picks too far down the chain............it would have to be the 1st, Kapanen and one of the 2 prospects So from your list it's Dallas, Buff, then TB........I don't believe Toronto or Montreal would ever happen, and not Dallas the way you have it....maybe take Honka out and they consider it! Don't underestimate Neilson or Dermott. Both had amazing rookie seasons for Marlies. We have enough Kapanens in Dahlin, Baertschi, Goldobin, Boeser. Sure I would be happy to have him but a couple of developed D prospects would be better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 2 hours ago, Alflives said: Agreed. How about we take Vilardi and Makar with 3 and 5? If we had both those picks (and assuming the first two guys don't fall to #3)... those would be ideal picks. Habing two picks means that they can be a little riskier with the #5 and pick Makar who has a higher bust factor than the other D... but also a higher ceiling. With just one of those picks, they will probably have to be safer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan since 82 Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 Now's the time to do it. It will weaken our back end for sure, but CT is getting too injury prone and he may not have any value left if he goes through another season of missing major amounts of games. Would miss him for sure but I think it's gotta happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 2 hours ago, Warhippy said: Stop...please... As for 1st overall picks busting being rare. Hall RNH Yakupov For their draft positions....they're incredible disappointments If you redo the hall draft he still goes #2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nowhereman Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 8 minutes ago, coryberg said: If you redo the hall draft he still goes #2 Johansen? Tarasenko? Kuznetsov? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riffraff Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 3 hours ago, Warhippy said: Stop...please... As for 1st overall picks busting being rare. Hall RNH Yakupov For their draft positions....they're incredible disappointments I wouldn't consider Hall a bust.....a bit of an underachiever relative to the draft as you say, but certainly not to be compared to yakupov or even RNH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honky Cat Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 38 minutes ago, Fan since 82 said: Now's the time to do it. It will weaken our back end for sure, but CT is getting too injury prone and he may not have any value left if he goes through another season of missing major amounts of games. Would miss him for sure but I think it's gotta happen. Thats an understatement...Tryamkins gone,Sbisa will most likely get claimed by LV....If you take Tanev out as well,there's a legit cause for grave concern on the Canucks back end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.