nazzymx Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 Why would Vancouver media release this kind of bs?. They are just hurting the Canucks; do you think Dahlen would be happy reading thay they soured on him? smh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAZY_4_NAZZY Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 Even if it is true, JB is doing his job by checking out to see what the interest level would be in his prospect. Sure, id be interested who exactly they are targeting to get in return for Dahlen. If its a legitimate top six scorer who is also young/who can grow with our young core, I wouldn't be against it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zhukini Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 For a Markus Granlund clone right? He’s done it before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tas Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 1 minute ago, Zhukini said: For a Markus Granlund clone right? He’s done it before. and how'd that trade work out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlwaysACanuckFan Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 1 minute ago, nazzymx said: Why would Vancouver media release this kind of bs?. They are just hurting the Canucks; do you think Dahlen would be happy reading thay they soured on him? smh TSN probably still sour after losing broadcasting rights to SN650. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zhukini Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 Just now, tas said: and how'd that trade work out? Considering he should be on waivers... about even Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo5789 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 Sounds more like an impatient Canucks "fan's" view rather than how the Canucks actually feel. Soured over his first year in NA? 29 points in 50 games and that's after a slow start. The media here is terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tas Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 Just now, Zhukini said: Considering he should be on waivers... about even the worst take. several years of serviceable, if unspectacular, two-way hockey, including a 19 goal season, is not "about even" with a player who can't get a sniff at the nhl and isn't even a factor at the ahl level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckledraggin Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 If you believe the Chicago would move on a young D thread, then I'd move him for Jokiharju. Tough to move on a guy with his potential though, it would need to be a good young D coming back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drakrami Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 Dahlen has potential to be as good as Baertschi. He was struggling in AHL early on and battled his way through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gttxc Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 Why is everyone criticizing this? If banning can pull off a hickey trade and trade dahlen for a defencemen with similar pedigree you do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 8 minutes ago, nazzymx said: Why would Vancouver media release this kind of bs?. They are just hurting the Canucks; do you think Dahlen would be happy reading thay they soured on him? smh Welcome to the last quarter century of local hate media. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zhukini Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 It’s ok at least he didn’t trade Forsling for Clendenning or anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bure_Pavel Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 Sekeres is click bait trash, I wouldnt believe the poop coming out of his mouth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bell Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 5 minutes ago, gttxc said: Why is everyone criticizing this? If banning can pull off a hickey trade and trade dahlen for a defencemen with similar pedigree you do it. Alienating your future franchise player before you've given him the chance at playing with his good friend, Sounds like a sound plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podz92 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 28 minutes ago, Salacious Crumb said: Sekeres is absolute garbage source. Agreed. I think he just makes $&!# up all willy-nilly...have never seen him hit on a single thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
on the cycle Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 Think he hasn't been given much opportunity much like Gadjovich, Lind, Jasek. Utica seems to be giving most opportunity to vets like Boucher and Kero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gttxc Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 1 minute ago, Bell said: Alienating your future franchise player before you've given him the chance at playing with his good friend, Sounds like a sound plan. I doubt Petterson is that sensitive. Sure he’d like to play with dahlen, but alienated? You can’t alienate the alien! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gttxc Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 1 minute ago, on the cycle said: Think he hasn't been given much opportunity much like Gadjovich, Lind, Jasek. Utica seems to be giving most opportunity to vets like Boucher and Kero. You don’t only trade players that suck... Unless you’re just making a comment on his development. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
189lb enforcers? Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 Yawn Could care less about the player or the click bait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.