Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Benning 20 minute Interview on 1040

Rate this topic


Provost

Recommended Posts

Hmm that does seem a little more positive from his end than before.

 

Previously it was generic bland statements about how he likes it here.  The same thing every player says.

 

Maybe it is in my head, but I buy this particular version a little more.  It genuinely seems like we are near the top of the pile in terms of landing spots.  I don’t know if we are above Southern California, but maybe right after that and we have the benefit of actually getting to negotiate with him.

 

I had a friend who played in Anaheim and was able to have some in depth conversations with lots of those guys (more than a decade ago).  They couldn’t gush more about how great it was playing there.  They had greet fans but as soon as they were two blocks from the arena, they were completely 

anonymous even the day after they won the Stanley Cup.  It is kind of the best of both worlds, compared with no one caring like in Florida and not getting a moment’s peace like in a Canadian city. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill Daly announced today that they intend to play a full 82 game season in 2020/21 starting in early December.

That means a large number of back to back games and an extremely condensed schedule.

Vancouver has probably one of the worst travel schedules in a normal year but it will be even more brutal in 2021.

This will put emphasis on the workload of our Goalies.

We will definitely need both Markstrom and Demko playing.

I am now officially in the Marky/Demko combo for this season

Edited by Mackcanuck
  • Cheers 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting thought someone mentioned, that with Markstrom and Tanev now UFAs, other teams may make them big offers, possibly enticing them to chase the money. Especially if Benning is going to try and sign them at a minimum, because there's just not enough cap. My first thought was TOR. They need both, a good veteran top 4 right-shot Dman, and a goalie who can steal games all season and in the playoffs. TOR probably can't afford them, but who knows, maybe they clear cap by trading one of their stars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said:

Interesting thought someone mentioned, that with Markstrom and Tanev now UFAs, other teams may make them big offers, possibly enticing them to chase the money. Especially if Benning is going to try and sign them at a minimum, because there's just not enough cap. My first thought was TOR. They need both, a good veteran top 4 right-shot Dman, and a goalie who can steal games all season and in the playoffs. TOR probably can't afford them, but who knows, maybe they clear cap by trading one of their stars.

The majority of teams with cap space to sign them, aren't competitive. That's their call. Good money here on a young, competitive team full of close team mates or better money/term elsewhere.

 

It's pretty straightforward.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mackcanuck said:

Bill Daly announced today that they intend to play a full 82 game season in 2020/21 starting in early December.

That means a large number of back to back games and an extremely condensed schedule.

Vancouver has probably one of the worst travel schedules in a normal year but it will be even more brutal in 2021.

This will put emphasis on the workload of our Goalies.

We will definitely need both Markstrom and Demko playing.

I am now officially in the Marky/Demko combo for this season

Montreal getting Jake Allen when they already have Carey Price makes a bit more sense. 

 

Hopefully if they choose to condense the schedule they focus a bit more on MLB-style series rather than traveling all over the damn continent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, aGENT said:

Tanev at $4.5 IMO but otherwise, yup.

Seems like we might be able to sign Toffoli/Tanev to friendlier deals. Would be real nice if JB managed to get Marky to sign 1 year with the promise to sign him longer after the expansion. Seems like a pipe dream though.

 

I imagine Virtanen and perhaps Stecher are gone though, that Hoglander/Lind get good looks(maybe 9 games for Hog) and OJ is with the club next year.

 

Need to trade Baer/Sutter, worst case buy them out. If we trade them and maybe Benn we could potentially keep Stecher.

  • Cheers 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miller - Pettersson - Boeser

Pearson - Horvat - Toffoli

Leivo - (?? via trade) - Gaudette

Motte - Beagle - MacEwen

Eriksson

 

Edler - Myers

Hughes - Tanev

Fantenberg - Rafferty

Juolevi

 

Markstrom

Demko

 

OUT - Sutter, Virtanen, Roussel, Stecher, Benn

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said:

Miller - Pettersson - Boeser

Pearson - Horvat - Toffoli

Leivo - (?? via trade) - Gaudette

Motte - Beagle - MacEwen

Eriksson

 

Edler - Myers

Hughes - Tanev

Fantenberg - Rafferty

Juolevi

 

Markstrom

Demko

 

OUT - Sutter, Virtanen, Roussel, Stecher, Benn

Hoglander is NHL ready too!!!!!!! ::D

 

Edit: maybe Virtanen for a C like Girgensons if we don't recoup a pick for him? I dunno just spitballing...

Edited by Herberts Vasiljevs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Junkyard Dog said:

Seems like we might be able to sign Toffoli/Tanev to friendlier deals. Would be real nice if JB managed to get Marky to sign 1 year with the promise to sign him longer after the expansion. Seems like a pipe dream though.

 

I imagine Virtanen and perhaps Stecher are gone though, that Hoglander/Lind get good looks(maybe 9 games for Hog) and OJ is with the club next year.

 

Need to trade Baer/Sutter, worst case buy them out. If we trade them and maybe Benn we could potentially keep Stecher.

Yeah, I'm wondering if we might even be able to squeeze Toffoli at/near his current hit of $4.6 or to maybe $4.8'ish +/- if he wants to be here bad enough/he's not likely getting offers much above $5 elsewhere anyway IMO.

 

$4.8 here, where he wants to be, is not far off $5.2 somewhere he doesn't, for instance.

 

Same goes for Tanev. He might be able to get closer to $5 elsewhere but...

 

The reality is, with covid cap, guys are going to have to take hair cuts on cap and term if they truly want to 'keep the band together'. And no sour grapes to anyone who goes for the money elsewhere.

 

And yeah, Stecher maybe we can retain if we can wiggle out of Benn but Virtanen is gone IMO. We can sign Leivo cheap, we have MacEwan and as you note, guys like Lind, Hoglander, Jasek etc who can all push for spots. Not to mention Podkolzin (game changer IMO) likely arriving a couple months in to the season.

 

Sutter and Baer are hopefully both moveable with retention (not expecting much/any return). Eriksson for sure will cost though.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, aGENT said:

Yeah, I'm wondering if we might even be able to squeeze Toffoli at/near his current hit of $4.6 or to maybe $4.8'ish +/- if he wants to be here bad enough/he's not likely getting offers much above $5 elsewhere anyway IMO.

 

$4.8 here, where he wants to be, is not far off $5.2 somewhere he doesn't, for instance.

 

Same goes for Tanev. He might be able to get closer to $5 elsewhere but...

 

The reality is, with covid cap, guys are going to have to take hair cuts on cap and term if they truly want to 'keep the band together'. And no sour grapes to anyone who goes for the money elsewhere.

 

And yeah, Stecher maybe we can retain if we can wiggle out of Benn but Virtanen is gone IMO. We can sign Leivo cheap, we have MacEwan and as you note, guys like Lind, Hoglander, Jasek etc who can all push for spots. Not to mention Podkolzin (game changer IMO) likely arriving a couple months in to the season.

 

Sutter and Baer are hopefully both moveable with retention (not expecting much/any return). Eriksson for sure will cost though.

I would sign Toffoli to a 4 year deal than Pearson to a 3 year the following off-season if he's willing to take a team friendly too. Both of their deals would be expiring when Hog/Pod ELCs are up and perhaps when Hughes's potential bridge deal is too.

 

I wouldn't do anymore than 4 years for Tanev too, preferably less though.

 

The kicker would be what Marky signs for if he stays here. If we let him go we save cap but we can't really afford to give any NMC if we want to keep Demko. That's why if I was JB I would be really pushing for a 1 year deal.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, aGENT said:

Sutter and Baer are hopefully both moveable with retention (not expecting much/any return).

Baer will be sent down again (whatever down looks like), it saves the 1 mil. You'd think he'd like to be playing in Europe vs sitting at home, its been a long time since he's seen any playing time. But I guess thats his prerogative but he could end up going 18 months without seeing competitive games if he's stuck on some AHL practice roster bubble. Not sure thats a career rejuvenating move. 

 

I wonder what it would really take to shed Sutter. I just have no idea who would trade for him now that so many teams are apparently putting in a 70 mil internal cap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, khay said:

What?

 

If Markstrom signs 4 year deal at 6 million per without NMC nor NTC, that contract is guaranteed.

 

So if Seattle picks him, Seattle is going to have to pay him 6 mil.

 

If Canucks can't trade him, then Canucks have to pay him 6 mil.

 

He doesn't lose dollar for anything.

 

From the player's perspective, if they don't care where they play, NMC/NTC doesn't matter. It only matters if they want to decide where they play.

 

 

I don't think that Seattle is going to be anywhere near as strong as Vegas is/was. You're assuming that 6m is all he will get on open market. I think he can get more from Colorado and that team is a legit contender and they can still add Pietrangelo and or Ekman Larsson. They have a ton of a cap space. Even if they only offer 4.5-6m I would be considering it over Vancouver if Vancouver doesn't give me a NMC. Now there is Buffalo who has basically unlimited cap space and have terrible goalies.. So you could see them throw 7-8m,  maybe more, at Markstrom to bring him in.  Minnesota, Carolina, Ottawa and Detroit need goalies as well so he will be able to get more than 6m it just depends if he wants to compete for a cup or not.

 

Edited by peaches5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

...... we could potentially keep Stecher.

Betcha Stetch would make a great 4th line rw and pk specialist.

His energy and tenaciity would compliment Motte nicely.

And contrast sharply with a fast-fading Sutter

And we'd have a readymade 7th D dressed every game.

He wants to stay here, why can't our coaches work with that passion?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

I would sign Toffoli to a 4 year deal than Pearson to a 3 year the following off-season if he's willing to take a team friendly too. Both of their deals would be expiring when Hog/Pod ELCs are up and perhaps when Hughes's potential bridge deal is too.

Frankly, I wouldn't sign either.

Don't see them being part of a Cup winning Canuck team in 2/3years.

If their mutual Vegas wiltings are any indication of character.

Leaving the heavy lifting to young Pettersson was shameful, but they weren't alone.

Time to see how Benning's promising draft picks handle pressure.

 

  • Huggy Bear 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...