AK_19 Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 I just don't see it. He's a good defenseman but the wrong type of one we need. Also he's way too expensive. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oregon.Duck Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 I wonder if he'd take a Swedish hometown discount to play on what is effectively Team Sweden 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrago Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 What if he was willing to play for 7 mil x 6 and we traded Myers away? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 Just now, thrago said: What if he was willing to play for 7 mil x 6 and we traded Myers away? I'd rather keep Myers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrago Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 Just now, thrago said: What if he was willing to play for 7 mil x 6 on team Sweden and we traded Myers away? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrago Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 (edited) 1 minute ago, King Heffy said: I'd rather keep Myers. k fair enough I haven't watched him play much and I also like Myers and think he is underrated. Edited July 14, 2022 by thrago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tower102 Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 I would rather trade Garland for Marino. But if the writing is on the wall with Miller, or possibly Myers is going... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 1 minute ago, thrago said: k fair enough I haven't watched him play much and I also like Myers and think he is underrated. Myers is capable of playing defence. Klingberg is almost as bad as Rielly and Barrie in his own zone. I wouldn't want that kind of liability in our own zone for league minimum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 We basically need a Tanev type dman. Or at least a steady physical dman. Klingberg is not that type at all. I don't see the fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KelownaCanucksFan Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJC Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 Dude was -28 last season. Demko says NO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westcoastcanucks777 Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 41 minutes ago, JM_ said: It is an upgrade: Hughes-Schenn OEL-Klingberg Rathbone/Dermott-Poolman But thats 15 mil in old Swedes. Old but real goode Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 20 minutes ago, King Heffy said: This. Not remotely what we need, too offense oriented, too expensive and too old. Rather just keep Myers and his only two years remaining in that case. This report is manure. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BureBurrito Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 Don't see it happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tas Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 not really commenting on this rumour at all specifically, but to those saying klingberg isn't the type of defenseman the team needs, remember that breakouts were a specific area of concern for rutherford. the team needs guys on the right side who can move the puck. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 1 minute ago, tas said: not really commenting on this rumour at all specifically, but to those saying klingberg isn't the type of defenseman the team needs, remember that breakouts were a specific area of concern for rutherford. the team needs guys on the right side who can move the puck. They also need to be able to actually play defence. Can't move the puck if you're fishing it out of your own net because you're a liability in your own zone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tas Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 10 minutes ago, King Heffy said: They also need to be able to actually play defence. Can't move the puck if you're fishing it out of your own net because you're a liability in your own zone. you won't be fishing it out of your net if you've already transitioned it up ice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 1 minute ago, tas said: you won't be fishing it out of your net if you've already transitioned it up ice. You won't be transitioning up the ice if you can't get the puck because you iced a defenceman who can't play defence. Keep this pylon off our team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 14, 2022 Share Posted July 14, 2022 1 hour ago, Mikey87 said: Not sure how reliable this dude is but Dhaliwal follows him? What do you folks think? Looks reliable if you're trying to score a stolen catalytic converter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts