dpn1 Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 8 minutes ago, Sbriggs said: You don't have to fight to be tough, he can provide protection with his physicality Using your definition of toughness I still am unsure of his toughness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post RetroCanuck Posted August 30, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted August 30, 2018 No wonder this thread always gets locked. All people do in here is compare d!ck sizes. If he comes back great, if not, oh well 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 Just now, RetroCanuck said: No wonder this thread always gets locked. All people do in here is compare d!ck sizes. If he comes back great, if not, oh well Tryamkin is 6’8”, right? He’s a friggin’ HUGE guy. He will be back in the NHL, but not here. i say we will trade his rights to an eastern team, like Washington or TBay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 6 minutes ago, Alflives said: Tryamkin is 6’8”, right? He’s a friggin’ HUGE guy. He will be back in the NHL, but not here. i say we will trade his rights to an eastern team, like Washington or TBay. He would be snapped up in a NY minute, probably worth more than Tanev and Edler. Not bad for a 3rd round pick. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 1 minute ago, Hairy Kneel said: He would be snapped up in a NY minute, probably worth more than Tanev and Edler. Not bad for a 3rd round pick. I totally agree. Tryamkin’s best value to us is likely his trade value. He’s worth an equal prospect (Madison Bowie) or a first for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 1 minute ago, Alflives said: I totally agree. Tryamkin’s best value to us is likely his trade value. He’s worth an equal prospect (Madison Bowie) or a first for sure. He's worth a 1st rounder. But I think his value to Hughes is greater than what we could get in a trade. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 5 minutes ago, Hairy Kneel said: He's worth a 1st rounder. But I think his value to Hughes is greater than what we could get in a trade. That’s an excellent point. I guess it comes down to whether his wife will want to live here? There seem to be more Russian players settling down back east. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sikhguy23 Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 Hughes and tryamkin together.... thought of it makes me drool. Then juolevi and woo as a second pairing. Our D doesen’t look so bad, especially with the added size of the Russian (no pun intended ). 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenhodgejr Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 Would be really cool if he came back and became an important piece of our core for the next decade similar to Chara in Boston Hughes Tyramkin Juolevi Woo Rathbone Brassard 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 3 hours ago, HorvatToBaertschi said: If you want to nitpick, Panarin must be a terrible player since he came over at 25 from the KHL, a league where Linden Vey is the top scorer... oh right, Panarin is a top 20 player in the world right now. Tryamkin has immense potential, is only what? 23? And has had his numbers improve, all while getting more important minutes in a more important role. There’s literally nothing negative to say about him other than the fact that he’s not in a nucks jersey right now. He would INSTANTLY be one of our top 3 dmen on opening night. He's 24, so by the time he comes back, he'll be 26yrs. Who knows what the Canuck D lineup will look like by then. He plays on the left side, so he will likely be behind Hughes and Juolevi ( I don't think Green likes playing guys on their wrong side). I hope he comes back and makes the top 6, but I'm not holding my breath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeneedLumme Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 18 minutes ago, higgyfan said: He's 24, so by the time he comes back, he'll be 26yrs. Who knows what the Canuck D lineup will look like by then. He plays on the left side, so he will likely be behind Hughes and Juolevi ( I don't think Green likes playing guys on their wrong side). I hope he comes back and makes the top 6, but I'm not holding my breath. He has stated that he is comfortable playing either side. And whenever I think about watching him play, I remember him on the right side, so I really don't think Green has a problem playing him on whichever side he is needed. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WonderTwinPowers Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 1 hour ago, Sikhguy23 said: Hughes and tryamkin together.... thought of it makes me drool. Then juolevi and woo as a second pairing. Our D doesen’t look so bad, especially with the added size of the Russian (no pun intended ). At least with Hughes and Tryamkin the average height will still be like 6' 3" for the pairing 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
combover Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 3 hours ago, dpn1 said: The Tranman doesn't like to fight' so I am unsure how much protection he will provide. Not really taking about fighting since it’s being phased out,and besides the clowns that run around and agitate rarely fight. But if demko s getting hacked or run I rather have tryamkin “explaining” what going to happen than Hughes. He just touched some guys and they would go crashing into the boards. He’s a big strong player. Him and possibly woo down the road would give demko some piece of mind. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Tre Mac Posted August 30, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted August 30, 2018 3 hours ago, RetroCanuck said: No wonder this thread always gets locked. All people do in here is compare d!ck sizes. If he comes back great, if not, oh well If the prospect forum was a battery than the Tryamkin thread would be the negative terminal and the Pettersson thread would be the positive. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NHL'er Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 32 minutes ago, Tre Mac said: If the prospect forum was a battery than the Tryamkin thread would be the negative terminal and the Pettersson thread would be the positive. For CDC generally, the Boeser thread would be the positive and the Gagner thread the negative Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 4 hours ago, dpn1 said: Using your definition of toughness I still am unsure of his toughness. Richardson's leg and Pirri's head are pretty sure. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qwags Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 22 minutes ago, Hutton Wink said: Richardson's leg and Pirri's head are pretty sure. When a guy breaks a leg simply by existing, you know Tryamkin has some strength. Or, at least, girth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Fingers Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 (edited) 4 hours ago, Alflives said: Tryamkin is 6’8”, right? He’s a friggin’ HUGE guy. He will be back in the NHL, but not here. i say we will trade his rights to an eastern team, like Washington or TBay. Trymakin is a enigma like many Russian players he makes no sense sometimes. Picture an average sized average NHL defender. IMO Trymakin is as capable NHL player as any without his size. Just imagine Trymakin as 6’2 205 lbs. To me he is currently about a 5/6 guy if he was average sized. He has the skating and defensive awareness with some modest offence potential. With some time as an average sized player he could maybe become a 3/4 defender. Now take that average player and make him 6’8 270lbs. With that size any contact even incidental is just plain scary for most NHL players. The added strength increases his shot power. He would become a better defender on reach alone. That average guy would become a net clearing freak of nature. Just by playing to average level of play a guy Trymakins size would be a sought after player in the NHL. As a 22 y/o rookie he was already there. IMO he played better than other defenders getting more minutes. JB needs to bring him back, if for anything, to boost his value and trade him for something great. Or add his rights to an Edler or Tanev package to boost the return into a great prospect like Foote and conditional 1st pending Trymakins return to the NHL. Edited August 30, 2018 by Phat Fingers 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 4 hours ago, dpn1 said: Using your definition of toughness I still am unsure of his toughness. He manhandled Jamie Benn and Getzlaf. First Canuck Dman to do that since Ohlund. Even Ohlund didnt have the sheer size advantage. I remember the games Tryamkin got into Benn's and Getzlaf kitchens and it still puts a grin on my face. I ffnn miss the guy. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpn1 Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 Ok. I will concede to you all who disagree with me but I remain skeptical on him. Hopefully I am wrong. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now