cripplereh Posted October 10, 2016 Share Posted October 10, 2016 make you think if trymakin gets better which D man will be moved next year???? that is if Olli is ready! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N4ZZY Posted October 10, 2016 Share Posted October 10, 2016 6 hours ago, cripplereh said: make you think if trymakin gets better which D man will be moved next year???? that is if Olli is ready! why move either. keep both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted October 10, 2016 Share Posted October 10, 2016 no room and they all want to play so one will ask for a trade so why wait if we have to many???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbyg43 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 On 10/9/2016 at 5:33 PM, ftmN said: great pass by olli on that assist. really looking forward to following him closely this season, if he gains 10+ pounds and develops his speed/game upwards, he's pretty much a roster lock next year. Edler - Tanev Hutton - Gudbranson Joulevi - Stecher Looks good. Man this is gonna be a long 2 year count down has begun. on the clock 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush17 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 On 10/7/2016 at 7:35 PM, WTG said: Juolevi's snipe https://streamable.com/kb5j Supremely impressed. Hope he can transition that to the nhl in the next few seasons lol. If he can do that at the O. Maybe we should simmer him a season in the A as well lol. Let him dominate each league :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Fingers Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 On October 9, 2016 at 9:33 PM, ftmN said: great pass by olli on that assist. really looking forward to following him closely this season, if he gains 10+ pounds and develops his speed/game upwards, he's pretty much a roster lock next year. Edler - Tanev Hutton - Gudbranson Joulevi - Stecher Looks good. Put Tanev with Juolevi and Edler with Stetcher. Trymakin as the 7th guy. Stoked for the future. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post aGENT Posted October 12, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted October 12, 2016 (edited) On 10/12/2016 at 5:42 AM, Eastcoast meets Westcoast said: Put Tanev with Juolevi and Edler with Stetcher. Trymakin as the 7th guy. Stoked for the future. Move Tanev and our 2017 first for our future 1C, play Tryamkin on the right. Hutton, Gudbranson Edler, Stetcher Juolevi, Tryamkin Pedan, whoever steps up. Edited October 13, 2016 by J.R. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 2 hours ago, J.R. said: Move Tanev and our 2017 first for aour future 1C, play Tryamkin on the right. Hutton, Gudbranson Edler, Stetcher Juolevi, Tryamkin Pedan, whoever steps up. That does not look bad at all. Then we can maybe move Edler in future and Juolevi replaces him as he develops, then potentially we can find a solid partner with Tryamkin for future on the 3rd pairing. Now if only Tanev could really fetch us a 1C, even as a prospect. Maybe we gamble with a team that has the potential to be a 1-3 overall pick in the upcoming draft and get it that way, but I don't see an easy answer to how that happens unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 (edited) 9 minutes ago, elvis15 said: That does not look bad at all. Then we can maybe move Edler in future and Juolevi replaces him as he develops, then potentially we can find a solid partner with Tryamkin for future on the 3rd pairing. Now if only Tanev could really fetch us a 1C, even as a prospect. Maybe we gamble with a team that has the potential to be a 1-3 overall pick in the upcoming draft and get it that way, but I don't see an easy answer to how that happens unfortunately. By that point, Tryamkin might take Edler's spot. Hopefully he's beyond 3rd pairing 2 years from now anyway. Of course Juolevi may have progressed beyond 3rd pair at that point as well. We may end up having to move a young guy too in a few years just to get deserved guys top 4 time (and slot Pedan in to a permanent 3rd pair role by that point). Perhaps in ~3+ years it looks like: Hutton, Gudbranson Juolevi, Tryamkin Pedan, Stetcher Brisebois, Subban Though that may short change Stetcher on 3rd pairing... Well in fairness, I did say Tanev + our 2017 1st. Might need to sweeten that further with a prospect or something but you'd think Tanev and a likely high/mid 1st would go a long way towards that goal. Edited October 12, 2016 by J.R. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Fingers Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 23 minutes ago, elvis15 said: That does not look bad at all. Then we can maybe move Edler in future and Juolevi replaces him as he develops, then potentially we can find a solid partner with Tryamkin for future on the 3rd pairing. Now if only Tanev could really fetch us a 1C, even as a prospect. Maybe we gamble with a team that has the potential to be a 1-3 overall pick in the upcoming draft and get it that way, but I don't see an easy answer to how that happens unfortunately. Tanev plus our 1st would either move us up in the draft or grab a young offensive center. Options are nice moving forward. A bit too early to bank on our young defenders, but things look very promising. Stetcher convinced me, Juolevi has great potential. If Trymakin can be developed properly this season we look very good on d and can move players for other needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 Yup, if they keep developing, it's a good problem to have. Then if we do get someone from Pedan, Subban, Brisebois, Neill, Olsen, future draft pick/free agent, etc. to develop then it's easy enough to find some 7th/8th guys to fill in as veterans and help them all get there. I agree we'll move up from our spot if we package Tanev and our 1st, but it's costly to grab that 1st overall, or any pick that stands to yield the kind of quality #1C prospect I'd want back. And while there isn't necessarily a generational player like we've seen recently with McDavid and Matthews, moving up to get Nolan Patrick will still cost a premium. That premium might not be Tanev either, depending on what team has the pick and what they need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinny in Vancouver Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 It's really a shame that he can't join the Comets already. He looks like a man among boys in this league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bure_Pavel Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 43 minutes ago, vinny_in_vancouver said: It's really a shame that he can't join the Comets already. He looks like a man among boys in this league. Does anyone know why Alex Nylander was able to go to the AHL, was he only on loan to the chl or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkUnderscore Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 21 minutes ago, Bure_Pavel said: Does anyone know why Alex Nylander was able to go to the AHL, was he only on loan to the chl or something? Indeed the European loan loophole seems to be in effect: http://www.thehockeynews.com/news/article/report-sabres-alex-nylander-could-head-to-ahl-thanks-to-loan-loophole 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 29 minutes ago, Bure_Pavel said: Does anyone know why Alex Nylander was able to go to the AHL, was he only on loan to the chl or something? It's the stupid loan v signed rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boudrias Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 14 hours ago, elvis15 said: Yup, if they keep developing, it's a good problem to have. Then if we do get someone from Pedan, Subban, Brisebois, Neill, Olsen, future draft pick/free agent, etc. to develop then it's easy enough to find some 7th/8th guys to fill in as veterans and help them all get there. I agree we'll move up from our spot if we package Tanev and our 1st, but it's costly to grab that 1st overall, or any pick that stands to yield the kind of quality #1C prospect I'd want back. And while there isn't necessarily a generational player like we've seen recently with McDavid and Matthews, moving up to get Nolan Patrick will still cost a premium. That premium might not be Tanev either, depending on what team has the pick and what they need. Elvis; Tanev and a 1st likely does not get you a generational 1C, especially in a weaker draft than last year. Quite honestly I do expect Van will be drafting in the top 5 again this year. That gives them a real shot at a 1C. IMHO Canuck fans are expecting to much from this roster as it continues its development. The only legit top 6 forwards in the group are all over 30 years old. The Twins and Erickson, one could argue that Hanson and Sutter are on the fringe. Horvat and Baer show promise. That is a organizational ticking time bomb. I do not expect real change until the Twins retire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 15 hours ago, elvis15 said: Yup, if they keep developing, it's a good problem to have. Then if we do get someone from Pedan, Subban, Brisebois, Neill, Olsen, future draft pick/free agent, etc. to develop then it's easy enough to find some 7th/8th guys to fill in as veterans and help them all get there. I agree we'll move up from our spot if we package Tanev and our 1st, but it's costly to grab that 1st overall, or any pick that stands to yield the kind of quality #1C prospect I'd want back. And while there isn't necessarily a generational player like we've seen recently with McDavid and Matthews, moving up to get Nolan Patrick will still cost a premium. That premium might not be Tanev either, depending on what team has the pick and what they need. I think we may be more likely to make a move for a 19-22'ish C prospect who might be stuck behind depth than just move up in the draft personally but we'll see what happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N4ZZY Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 1 hour ago, J.R. said: I think we may be more likely to make a move for a 19-22'ish C prospect who might be stuck behind depth than just move up in the draft personally but we'll see what happens. just win the lottery 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 2 minutes ago, N4ZZY said: just win the lottery 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N4ZZY Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 19 minutes ago, J.R. said: if you did. you would've said it JR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now