Johnny Torts Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Chris Tanev for PLD fair trade Columbus wins the cup we win it in a couple years all good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.53 Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 First, I would suggest adding proposal to the title before people come for your head. It's a minor point but just word of advice. But honestly, if Columbus was to say, experience an injury, I could see them making a trade to keep this going. That town is buzzing right now, and they will not tolerate the team going down due to mass injury again. A 26 year old Chris Tanev could be intriguing. PLD is still a third overall pick though. We would have to offer up a little more, but I like a basic framework of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Goblin Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 2 hours ago, Johnny Torts said: Chris Tanev for PLD fair trade Columbus wins the cup we win it in a couple years all good 1 hour ago, Mr.53 said: First, I would suggest adding proposal to the title before people come for your head. It's a minor point but just word of advice. But honestly, if Columbus was to say, experience an injury, I could see them making a trade to keep this going. That town is buzzing right now, and they will not tolerate the team going down due to mass injury again. A 26 year old Chris Tanev could be intriguing. PLD is still a third overall pick though. We would have to offer up a little more, but I like a basic framework of this. I think it's a pretty fair deal considering they're getting a top 2 defenseman for a top prospect. But of course this depends upon the availability of comparable defensemen of Tanev's calibre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 We'd probably have to add a bit more, but in all honesty, If we were to move Tanev, there are players I'd rather go after than PLD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 1 hour ago, Mr.53 said: First, I would suggest adding proposal to the title before people come for your head. It's a minor point but just word of advice. This. More to the point of your post, I think Columbus laughs at giving up on Dubois so early. We need to add more to make that work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 6 hours ago, Johnny Torts said: Chris Tanev for PLD fair trade Columbus wins the cup we win it in a couple years all good Wouldn't Torts rather want the Twins? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABNuck Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Cap space people...cap space. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Columbus is annoyed with you; Sorry, no way a top team wants to make changes unless is costing them picks/players that aren't in the NHL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABNuck Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Only way that CBJ can make any kind of a deal (one where they give up a prospect for a seasoned NHL'er to make a cup run) is if Clarkson's salary leaves town as well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlanB Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 I don't see this happening, at least not a straight 1-for-1 deal. I'm not familiar enough with CBJ to know if they're maneuvering to 'all in' mode but this would be that type of move imo. PLD is their future - you don't give that up unless you're pretty sure you can win now. Their crew hasn't been battle tested in the playoffs so going all in would be a great risk in my view. 1 minute ago, Alflives said: Wouldn't Torts rather want the Twins? Why, does he need some shot-blockers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Columbus' goals against is the best in the NHL. Defence doesn't seem to be a problem. PLD is also struggling in World Juniors. We'd just have people complaining he's another Virtanen. The deal makes no sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 12 minutes ago, PlanB said: Their crew hasn't been battle tested in the playoffs so going all in would be a great risk in my view. This is particularly true of their d-core which has little-to-no significant playoff experience. Tanev would be a valuable asset to them in this regard. This proposal would be too beneficial for the Canucks franchise therefore I don't believe it would happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklehead80 Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 26 minutes ago, Chris said: Columbus is annoyed with you; Sorry, no way a top team wants to make changes unless is costing them picks/players that aren't in the NHL. Not so sure it's such a change as you may think. Bringing in a guy like Tanev would make there d-core even stronger. Unless anybody else was coming our way, the only change it would make would be strengthening their defence and probably causing youngsters Murray and Nutivaara to possibly sit a game here and there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 4 hours ago, ajhockey said: This. More to the point of your post, I think Columbus laughs at giving up on Dubois so early. We need to add more to make that work. In the OPs defense CDC, after such a non productive WJC thus fat would be offering PLD as part of a package for Kane so he's probably not far off for this forums mind set Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-SN- Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Columbus says no and asks Benning what his IQ level is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shazzam Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Even if they can fit Tanev in this year into their cap, next year will be difficult. They should hang on to PLD. ELC are quite valuable for contending teams. I'm not sold on them though, I doubt they make it far in the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 10 hours ago, Mr.53 said: First, I would suggest adding proposal to the title before people come for your head. It's a minor point but just word of advice. But honestly, if Columbus was to say, experience an injury, I could see them making a trade to keep this going. That town is buzzing right now, and they will not tolerate the team going down due to mass injury again. A 26 year old Chris Tanev could be intriguing. PLD is still a third overall pick though. We would have to offer up a little more, but I like a basic framework of this. 9 hours ago, Green Goblin said: I think it's a pretty fair deal considering they're getting a top 2 defenseman for a top prospect. But of course this depends upon the availability of comparable defensemen of Tanev's calibre. Columbus has absolutely no need for Tanev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 13 hours ago, Johnny Torts said: Chris Tanev for PLD fair trade Columbus wins the cup we win it in a couple years all good Not sure why you're getting minus'd so harshly, if CBJ wanted to do that deal i'd be ecstatic. It needs more pieces tho for the cap space. I could see something more along the lines of them sending us Boone Jenner and a pick... but we could probably get more than that out of other teams if Tanev is really on the table. We could probably get TO's 1st round pick and JVR for Tanev and maybe the Torts 2018 2nd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 25 minutes ago, S'all Good Man said: Not sure why you're getting minus'd so harshly, if CBJ wanted to do that deal i'd be ecstatic. It needs more pieces tho for the cap space. I could see something more along the lines of them sending us Boone Jenner and a pick... but we could probably get more than that out of other teams if Tanev is really on the table. We could probably get TO's 1st round pick and JVR for Tanev and maybe the Torts 2018 2nd. Almost rather have Kapanen, 1st, +(?). JVR's just another body to protect, who we'd probably have to overpay to keep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.