Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Rumor] Nate Schmidt being dealt very soon any minute now


Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, Scottydzik said:

Ya one can dream parayko is untouchable but imagine a group of

tarasenko Peterrson boeser

Hoglander horvat garland

pearson jt Miller podz

motte dickson gadz

highmore

Tarasenko’s salary demands are exorbitant are they not?

  • Wat 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bertuzzipunch said:

Pfft screw tarasenko we dont need him 

I agree. Our top 6 looks pretty awesome as is...

 

Miller Petey Boeser

Hoglander Horvat Garland

 

..and we still have some glaring holes on the blueline and bottom 6 that need to be addressed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nicklas Bo Hunter said:

With how Benning does things i am actually expecting to do a trade out of nowhere like Pearson for cholowski from seattle

Pearson? Unlikely.

 

Seattle has to move a couple of young D-men or put them on waivers to start the season. They may even get a Ufa D-man and move others. I'm interested to see who they grab in free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, 48MPHSlapShot said:

I agree. Our top 6 looks pretty awesome as is...

 

Miller Petey Boeser

Hoglander Horvat Garland

 

..and we still have some glaring holes on the blueline and bottom 6 that need to be addressed.

 

Where is the glaring hole on in the bottom 6? 

 

Pearson Dickinson Pod

Motte (Insert one of many options) MacEwen

 

Our D does needs to be completed though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 48MPHSlapShot said:

I agree. Our top 6 looks pretty awesome as is...

 

Miller Petey Boeser

Hoglander Horvat Garland

 

..and we still have some glaring holes on the blueline and bottom 6 that need to be addressed.

 

Ya you put tarasenko in there and Miller on 3rd line we excelled best with him at centre that might be one of deepest line up vans had

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 48MPHSlapShot said:

I agree. Our top 6 looks pretty awesome as is...

 

Miller Petey Boeser

Hoglander Horvat Garland

 

..and we still have some glaring holes on the blueline and bottom 6 that need to be addressed.

 

Miller Petey Boeser were beyond brutal 5 on 5.  If we are going into next year with the same top line it will be another disaster year.  The top line needs a shakeup.  

  • Wat 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Scottydzik said:

Ya you put tarasenko in there and Miller on 3rd line we excelled best with him at centre that might be one of deepest line up vans had

Tarasenko is still a top line winger and would look grear wiyh Petey but hes too expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...