Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Waivers] Ballard put on waivers


Recommended Posts

He was probably put on waivers because of cap. We would have 8.2 million in cap space if he gets picked up, enough to resign players and maybe sign a FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what, Buyouts are stupid business and bad asset management. Lou + Horvat is better than Schnieder + a 30 million dollar bill+ cap hit penalties. Losing Ballard for free or a minor asset is better than losing Ballard with a multimillion dollar bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're. It's.

And Ballard has extensive history of playing well at the NHL level. Edler has NEVER demonstrated he can play acceptable defence at this level. Edler just signed a huge contract at a much longer term than Ballard has left and is a giant risk we can't afford to take right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're. It's.

And Ballard has extensive history of playing well at the NHL level. Edler has NEVER demonstrated he can play acceptable defence at this level. Edler just signed a huge contract at a much longer term than Ballard has left and is a giant risk we can't afford to take right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew the Aquilini's were broke, almost everone of their investments, from the realty around rogers arena to blueberry farms has tanked this past year. I'll make a more lengthy post about this later, but it eexplains the Schneider movement and Ballard being waived, NOBODY is being bought out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He wasn't tremendous, but i don't think he was pressbox-worthy either.

Hell, i would've put him out as a forward over a few of our bottom-6 fodder guys.

Him and AV clearly didn't see eye-to-eye. Now both are gone. Oh well.

Good luck, Keith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will be interesting: we'll see just how ruthless this market has become if nobody takes Ballard on conventional waivers. Definitely there should be 4-5 teams interested on the basis of need, but they could get greedy and want him only for a discounted, post buy-out salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is great news, even if he isn't on unconditional waivers I would think it's a sign he will be bought out if no one picks him up. They absolutely need to buy him out, without buying him out the Canucks only have 4 million for 5 roster spots. having 8 million for 6 roster spots isn't so bad especially when some of those spots are 4'th line 7'th defensemen 13'th forward spots. If th Canucks lose Ballard they have the ability to get 1 more impact player with 4 million or so cap hit instead of press box ballard with a 4.2 million cap hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...