73 Percent Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 11 minutes ago, Master Mind said: Garrison. How can you say a a giant douche is better than a turd sandwich Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 So then we're going to the cup? Worst to 1st flip-flop? So they worst season since 1998. We got the twins in 1999. So... OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 3 minutes ago, Gooseberries said: How can you say a a giant douche is better than a turd sandwich Too many variables. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 2 minutes ago, S'all Good Man said: So then we're going to the cup? Worst to 1st flip-flop? So they worst season since 1998. We got the twins in 1999. So... OK. If we are going to be bad, we need to be REALLY bad. This going for the middle stuff is not the best plan. I think anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Just now, Alflives said: If we are going to be bad, we need to be REALLY bad. This going for the middle stuff is not the best plan. I think anyway. We're in an era if you make the playoffs with a decent goaltender you can go far. And look at Edmonton - a decade of sh!t hockey and they still aren't going to make the playoffs. McD will probably sign with TO at the and of his ELC anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 The Canucks should have that posted in the locker room - if that doesn't motivate them - nothing will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Take the Canucks away and completely out of the equation. That projection doesn't look like it could be very far off from reality. Except of course that when you add the canucks we're obviously in the wrong spot. We should be 1 spot behind Las vegas still Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Wow! 45 Ls would be tough to watch. The fit will would hit the shan pretty good 'round here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4thLineGrinder Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 i like the role of underdogs for the canucks it doesn't get much lowered expectations than 65 points Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 I think we're going to be bad... but not this bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honky Cat Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Nothing really new as far as the Canucks are concerned..but some of the other predictions are pretty whack...Notably,the Flames,Canadiens and Rangers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReggieBush Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Has a team that was picked to finish last ever won a cup? All I know is that there will be one more after this year GO CANUCKS GO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 1 hour ago, 4thLineGrinder said: i like the role of underdogs for the canucks it doesn't get much lowered expectations than 65 points Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
logic Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 They have Pittsburgh projected to win the presidents trophy and thats all I needed to see to read in order to realise how clueless whoever USA Today Sports is. Durr Cup Winners automatically best team next year durr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madwolf Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 2 hours ago, PhillipBlunt said: Well, it is American, so they base it half on science, but then dismiss that completely in favour of God and Puxatony Phil. Am American, can confirm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 This is the worst "prediction" I've seen yet. Us only getting 65 points????? Colorado only getting 75? Give me a break. We're making the playoffs. Bank on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 46 minutes ago, logic said: They have Pittsburgh projected to win the presidents trophy and thats all I needed to see to read in order to realise how clueless whoever USA Today Sports is. Durr Cup Winners automatically best team next year durr Except Sid looks like he's on fire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Interesting looks like the Ducks miss. I think Calgary is high especially if Johnny sits for awhile. Canucks will battle for 6/7 in the division. Overall it looks pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 USA Today, that's where I go to get the best hockey info and advice (not) Carolina's going to beat us by 23 points? yeah, okay. Skinner has his work cut out for him. Good luck with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Yay! More media 'experts' with clueless predictions!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.