Popular Post Alflives Posted August 20, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted August 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: I know it's dangerous to get caught up in potential. But from the clips I've seen, I hope Podz absolutely destroys in the NHL. And puts Tkachuk through the glass. Podz will certainly repeatedly punch Tkatchuk in the head. Podz has a really nasty side to his game, which I like - A LOT. I wonder if JB knew about this nastiness before he drafted Podz. It’s on thing to be skilled, but adding nasty makes a very good player, a great player. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 Just now, Alflives said: Podz will certainly repeatedly punch Tkatchuk in the head. Podz has a really nasty side to his game, which I like - A LOT. I wonder if JB knew about this nastiness before he drafted Podz. It’s on thing to be skilled, but adding nasty makes a very good player, a great player. He's got a serious Ovechkin side, with a healthy dose of snarl. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBatch Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 1 hour ago, N7Nucks said: The fact he had a Duchene to trade already means he had more to work with than Benning. Kesler was by far our best trade chip and we only had two teams he’d accept a trade to. Also Sakic had a MacKinnon and a Landeskog to build around when he officially became GM which was after the 12/13 season I believe. We just had Bo when Benning signed on. Good point. I’d like to add that Sakic was getting the JB treatment the entire time he sat on Duchene (over a year and a half since it became known Duchene wanted out) - was heavily criticized for doing nothing - then became a hero and received all sorts of good press about how patient he was and how good of a return it was. Of course the world waited to see if that chip became Hughes or Kakko, poor Sakic all he got was Byram (who with Makar could be the next Suter - Weber routine soon enough). After winning a round (an upset too) COL now looks to be the next powerhouse in the West. Unfortunately for him and all the other teams including us he’s waiting for Point or Marner to sign to set the market for Rantanen (over a PPG and playoff hero) - an AHO like deal is likely what he will face. Good thing they have McKinnon locked under the former RFA type deals (I really really hate Dubas he had an opportunity to re-set things - instead he’s paying AM like a top 3 guy in the league until free agency where he will likely add a few more brinks trucks in his bank account, and a very average star in Nylander more money then McKinnon) but in the end COL face their own CHI like problems once Makar and Byram get paid...and they need a second line center on their long term wish list (Horvat for Byram anyone ?). Under the new cap (star RFAS getting third contract money) every single team in the league is going to have holes somewhere. CAL has goaltending - otherwise they’d be a juggernaut. NSH has offense issues - SJ has holes all over the place and TO has to win now or they likely won’t with their core, defense will be worse this year - but Barrie and OReilly will get their points. ... and on and on except for TB. They have no holes. Because they have the extra cash with no state taxes and have made the most of it. Kucherov at 9.5 is one of the best contracts in hockey right now.. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Hogs & Podz Posted August 20, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted August 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Alflives said: Podz will certainly repeatedly punch Tkatchuk in the head. Podz has a really nasty side to his game, which I like - A LOT. I wonder if JB knew about this nastiness before he drafted Podz. It’s on thing to be skilled, but adding nasty makes a very good player, a great player. But he's not 'dirty' by nature like MT. He's just ultra competitive and won't let anyone push him around. The last article that Sterlitzer translated really shows how he looks at his game and how he responds to on ice situations. He's straight up. No messing around, but not looking to stir things up just because... However his relentless type of game WILL most definitely get under the skin of opponents. 2 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 15 minutes ago, AlwaysACanuckFan said: Watch out for the Russian locomotive. The Russian Forward version of Lionel Conacher? (He was a defenseman nicknamed "The Big Train" back in the 30s). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo5789 Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 23 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: He's got a serious Ovechkin side, with a healthy dose of snarl. He's definitely got some Ovechkin style to his game, just doesn't have the elite shot. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post -Vintage Canuck- Posted August 20, 2019 Author Popular Post Share Posted August 20, 2019 5 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post -Vintage Canuck- Posted August 20, 2019 Author Popular Post Share Posted August 20, 2019 Canucks make it official: 4 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRussianRocket1994 Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 5 minutes ago, -Vintage Canuck- said: Canucks make it official: Nice!!! Glad to hear!! Congrats Jim! 1040 (J Pat) spewing negativity / hate yet again! What f’n clowns!! 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, IRR said: Nice!!! Glad to hear!! Congrats Jim! 1040 (J Pat) spewing negativity / hate yet again! What f’n clowns!! No surprise. That twerp is just gearing up for the season. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 Like it happened to many coaches and GM in the past, many have been fired right after signing such an extension. I believe that will be the case with Benning if Canucks don't make the playoffs this year. The reason for the extension is that it's not popular practice to let a coach or GM run out their last year of contract. If the Canucks breakout this year, Benning would have all the leverage in negociation. While Benning is securing his future by adding three more years to his contracts, at the same time, the Owners are telling him, we're not giving you another five-year plan to rebuild this team, future is now. We need to see results soon. I like the contract for both the Canucks and Benning. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 I believe Benning has 2 years to get the Canucks back to the playoffs. If he does it this year, great. If he fails to get the team in by 2021, he'll be gone. I have faith they'll get in though. I see no reason to let Benning go anyway. He's done a masterful job in rebuilding the roster and prospect pool. Let's keep this train a rollin'! 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 10 hours ago, ba;;isticsports said: which ours now could be considered flops until proven as well Why consider them flops? Why not consider them unproven potential players? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 2 hours ago, Alflives said: Podz will certainly repeatedly punch Tkatchuk in the head. Podz has a really nasty side to his game, which I like - A LOT. I wonder if JB knew about this nastiness before he drafted Podz. It’s on thing to be skilled, but adding nasty makes a very good player, a great player. Great post hoping he is our nasty top liner we have been looking for- reminds me more of a shanahan or messier, big, mean, two way, fingers crossed he can be the anti-tkachuk tryamkin, poldkozin, Roussell, beags, Miller, Ferland, Benn- we should be very hard to play against esp in 2 yrs. with any luck- JV and Meyers can get nasty knowing they will have ample back up. Last time we were hard to play against in a nasty way was 1994 and maybe 2011 with burr, Torres, kes, bieksa but more of a hard to play against due to skill way. but that 94 team was nasty and that’s what we need. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 Tanev + Beartschi + Lind fir Ristoleinen and a 3rd 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 2 hours ago, theo5789 said: He's definitely got some Ovechkin style to his game, just doesn't have the elite shot. Doesn't have the same skating. Ovi at 6'3 230 has unbelievable speed. Guy is a train. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Gaudette Celly Posted August 20, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted August 20, 2019 On 8/18/2019 at 7:57 PM, Smashian Kassian said: But I think my question is whether the team is at the point of those pieces (at the premium price paid) putting us over the top. 1. They did not overpay 2. Those players are not rentals 4 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Dr. Crossbar Posted August 20, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted August 20, 2019 The way the last two letters from FA read, it sounds like ownership is truly committed to the longer term process of getting this right ... as long as the goals are being met and things continue to go in the right direction. Interestingly, with the new signings, FA still says it will take time to achieve the longer-term goals. So that indicates to me ownership is fully aware that more time is needed beyond this coming season. Especially with the prospects in our pipeline. I could be cynical about it. But to me it looks like once the Sedins were gone, ownership went all in with Benning's vision to give him a legit shot with the team he created rather than the team he inherited. So that timeframe of a 3 year contract for Benning only makes sense. We're still not where we need to be yet and more time is needed. For Benning to lose his job next year, the train would have to REALLY fall off the rails this coming season on an epic scale of the Torts season. 3 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeyman109 Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 14 minutes ago, Hutton Wink said: 1. They did not overpay 2. Those players are not rentals Great post I completely agree. That is the point exactly. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 8 hours ago, IBatch said: Not sure if anyone else mentioned this but he also had Booth at 4.75 - both him and Ballard were his two buy-outs from last lock-outs freebies. One thing about AF he sure doesn’t mind spending the money - at the time (within one year) he bought out MG, Torts, Booth, Ballard and took on part of Luongo salary which he’s still paying 9 million on over the next three years - a MG cap circumvention attempt that the league warned against but he did anyways (and one last MG mistake that’s holding the current team back). Just for fun google MG and see all the articles that’s pop up of what sort of mess he turned the team into starting from 2013 and continuing for years afterwards. Hockey writers get it as do most fans. Personally I can forgive him, he went all in and did what he could to give the team a cup and we came very close to just that. As far as Maholtras final contract he made 2.5 with a NTC, and the cap was 56-60 million during the duration, would work out to about what we just signed Ferland for in today’s dollars. Agreed Sutter is too expensive - at least 1 million and that’s if he plays and also why most proposals (and there are many) have the retention in them. But compared to LE he looks pretty good ha ha. Beagles is fine - one year too many though and so far Rousell earned every cent. LEs the only real bummer - factually about the same as well - Ballard and Booth in percentage of cap. So MG had TWO LEs to deal with. Also back to MG - at the time both Edlers and Keslers contracts were thought to be too expensive, didn’t take long for Keslers to look good, and after a while Edlers too. Think people forget what other comparables were making back then (better defenseman making less and Kesler was getting more then some first line centres before he even broke out). That said MG was an expert at getting players to sign for fair-good deals, by the use of clauses. Burrows had the best deal on the team but got his pay-cheque too with his next deal....but he also had his albatrosses too. Booth came after 2011. I wouldnt call Luongo's contract a mistake. It allowed us the cap space to add the extra pieces we needed to build the team we had. If Luongo signed a normal deal at fair market he wouldve been making more than 5.3. I don't recall Kesler or Edlers deals being expensive. Kesler had back to back 70 pts years. Edler had just shy of 50 & was seen as on the rise. Both were good deals for the club. Everyone has a different opinion of MG & that regime, just like this current one. He & LG did a really good job on contracts overall imo. Better than Benning pretty easily I'd say. Both regimes have pros & cons. Like drafting as the opposite example. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts