coryberg Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 35 minutes ago, babalu said: So a contender will trade their pick (#29) and a prospect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amebushi Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 1 minute ago, eeeeergh said: Haha yeah I guess podz would qualify. Hogs is a roster player for us so I'd say hes prob valued at a bit more than a top tier prospect, but thats just my opinion So realistically the fair deal would be: Podz + 9th OA for Reinhardt.. Rather take our chances in the draft and have a great player that can produce for us on an ELC in a couple years time. I totally agree. I’m probably just a homer but I wouldn’t give up Podz for Reinhardt straight across. After seeing him put up with terrible coaching and ice time in the KHL and still produce against men I believe he will take every opportunity and exceed expectations. Everything in Buffalo reeks of desperation and losing, I’d take Reinhardt but only at a good discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 3 minutes ago, eeeeergh said: So realistically the fair deal would be: Podz + 9th OA for Reinhardt.. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 1st and a top prospect for Reinhart but the 9OA should be enough/better than a late 1st pick and prospect. Other option is Lockwood + next year's 1st. We'd have to fiddle with the cap though. Reinhart + Ristolainen for Schmidt + 1st + Lockwood + Chatfield? That sort of megadeal just doesn't happen anymore sadly but would fix a lot of issues, probably create a lot of issues too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grumpyone Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 Holtby and schmidt to Boston for their 1st (21 oa) + Debrusk then flip that 21st pick to Buffalo + Gadjovich for Reinhart 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucksownyou Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 19 minutes ago, DownUndaCanuck said: 1st and a top prospect for Reinhart but the 9OA should be enough/better than a late 1st pick and prospect. Other option is Lockwood + next year's 1st. We'd have to fiddle with the cap though. Reinhart + Ristolainen for Schmidt + 1st + Lockwood + Chatfield? That sort of megadeal just doesn't happen anymore sadly but would fix a lot of issues, probably create a lot of issues too. Schmidt is not waiving for Buffalo. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kobayashi Maru Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 4 hours ago, Nucksownyou said: Schmidt is not waiving for Buffalo. To Vancouver: Reinhart, Ristolainen To Buffalo: 9OA, 2022 Van 2nd, 2021 Phi 2nd, Lockwood To Philly: Schmidt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 (edited) 6 hours ago, babalu said: So Nylander is worth...that and more because he's produced in the playoffs? A one time 65 point centre, but more average 50 point centre is now worth THAT???? Miller must be worth 2 firsts and a prospect then Edited July 22, 2021 by Warhippy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShawnAntoski Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 Spending cap and finite assets for a player that doesnt that won’t really move the needle - soft player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 19 minutes ago, Warhippy said: So Nylander is worth...that and more because he's produced in the playoffs? A one time 65 point centre, but more average 50 point centre is now worth THAT???? Miller must be worth 2 firsts and a prospect then More than that seeing as he is signed at a bargain for 2 more years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 6 hours ago, babalu said: Which is exactly why Benning is exploring other trade options. If we had a late first maybe we make this deal. The prospect would be someone like Juolevi. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Torts Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 5 hours ago, DownUndaCanuck said: 1st and a top prospect for Reinhart but the 9OA should be enough/better than a late 1st pick and prospect. Other option is Lockwood + next year's 1st. We'd have to fiddle with the cap though. Reinhart + Ristolainen for Schmidt + 1st + Lockwood + Chatfield? That sort of megadeal just doesn't happen anymore sadly but would fix a lot of issues, probably create a lot of issues too. This . We aren’t trading any random first, or the 32nd OA pick. It’s the 9th. We aren’t adding a potential future core piece in Podz because they don’t think the 9th OA is enough. Take it or leave it. If you want a chance at one of the potential star defenceman at the upcoming draft. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 Just now, DeNiro said: Which is exactly why Benning is exploring other trade options. If we had a late first maybe we make this deal. The prospect would be someone like Juolevi. The ask on the Sabre guys is insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 Just now, Alflives said: The ask on the Sabre guys is insane. Another case of a GM getting greedy. My guess is they have to lower their asking price on all three players they’re going to trade. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 Just now, DeNiro said: Another case of a GM getting greedy. My guess is they have to lower their asking price on all three players they’re going to trade. Teams are going to use up their cap space on free agents, and the Sabres will be stuck. It’s Going to be a very unhappy room when they hit camp. Really nice environment for all those young players to learn and develop in. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 5 minutes ago, DeNiro said: Another case of a GM getting greedy. My guess is they have to lower their asking price on all three players they’re going to trade. Yeah getting more than our 9th without taking salary back for a guy that doesnt wanna be there cracks me up. Just keep the pick unless they take loui contract off our hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captainhorvat Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 All this hype and proposals but we all know ain’t nothing gonna happen… 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Torts Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 4 minutes ago, captainhorvat said: All this hype and proposals but we all know ain’t nothing gonna happen… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 BUffalo going to ask the moon for Eichel and the stars for Reinhart but going to once again be drafting top 5 because they aren't moving squat. Want that 9th overall? It will cost Dahlin now ya greedy idiots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SergioMomesso Posted July 22, 2021 Share Posted July 22, 2021 If McTavish, Hughes, Clarke, Johnson or Lucius are still available at 9OA. Keep the pick. If none of those 4 are left, trade it for help on the back end. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now