Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Signing] Canucks re-sign Brandon Sutter


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Me_ said:

It saddens me that the fandom love given to an athlete is balanced with his monetary compensation.

This is very true. It seems that some fans (or even a lot of fans) almost expect what could be thought of as unrealistic perfection and when that perfection doesn't happen (ie. even a slight overpayment), they freak out.

 

And outside of his contract, he's been a very important piece for us; yet, so many seem to forget or ignore that.

Edited by The Lock
  • Cheers 1
  • Vintage 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Lock said:

This is very true. It seems that some fans (or even a lot of fans) almost expect what could be thought of as unrealistic perfection and when that perfection doesn't happen (ie. even a slight overpayment), they freak out.

 

And outside of his contract, he's been a very important piece for us; yet, so many seem to forget or ignore that.

It's all based in deep insecurity

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PositionOfPower said:

Jesus hate this signing. Why go with same old again. He aint that helpful for us and no toughness. 

Who would have been a better 4th line Centre? Zero risk 1 year 1 million.

 

our line up is looking solid:

 

Miller-EP40-Boeser

Hoglander-Horvat-Garland

Pearson-Dickinson-Podkolzin

Highmore-Sutter-Motte

MacEwan

 

OEL-Myers

Hughes-Hamonic

Rathbone-Poolman

Juolevi/Hunt-Schenn

 

Demko

Halak

 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, R3aL said:

Who would have been a better 4th line Centre? Zero risk 1 year 1 million.

 

our line up is looking solid:

 

Miller-EP40-Boeser

Hoglander-Horvat-Garland

Pearson-Dickinson-Podkolzin

Highmore-Sutter-Motte

MacEwan

 

OEL-Myers

Hughes-Hamonic

Rathbone-Poolman

Juolevi/Hunt-Schenn

 

Demko

Halak

 

I’m liking the lineup. If we stay healthy, this could be a very enjoyable year.

  • Cheers 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Huggy Bear 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, cocanuck said:

Too slow and soft to play against,, was hoping for more speed and size on 4th line role..  oh well guess we had nothing better

He may not be a hitter/big body but he's not soft. The guy is a terrific shut down C and at 1 mil a great signing for the 4th line. He kills Penalties, plays a strong shut down role, and takes away hard d minutes from Bo and Miller. Hockey is a team sport, his ability to perform the dirty work and the hard defensive work no one likes is what allows Bo, Miller and Petey to have more offensive opportunity.

  • Cheers 2
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, R3aL said:

Who would have been a better 4th line Centre? Zero risk 1 year 1 million.

 

our line up is looking solid:

 

Miller-EP40-Boeser

Hoglander-Horvat-Garland

Pearson-Dickinson-Podkolzin

Highmore-Sutter-Motte

MacEwan

 

OEL-Myers

Hughes-Hamonic

Rathbone-Poolman

Juolevi/Hunt-Schenn

 

Demko

Halak

 

I have some concerns regarding our right side defence, as well as our centre position if someone goes down in those positions. Overall looks solid if the team can stay healthy. 

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...