Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Signing] Canucks re-sign Tanner Pearson


Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said:

I wouldn’t say nothing wrong, its maybe 500-750k too much for 3 years. Definitely not worthy of 20+ pages of whining drama queens either. 

I agree with this and I was a little surprised by it. Whining is what is done best on these boards. Remember all the handwringing about Tanev & Marky? Demko played well, Marky faltered and then everyone only complained about losing Tanev. Here’s a real world problem for you - Calgary is having to decide between exposing Giordano (their captain) or Tanev in the entry draft. Every team has big issues to deal with. While this contract might not be ideal it’s not something to lose our minds over.

  • Cheers 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Elias Pettersson said:

If Hoglander is better than Podkolzin then why was Podkolzin the first round pick in that draft and Hoglander the second round pick?  What information do you have that confirms Hoglander will be better than Podkolzin?  Anything?  There is nobody out there who thinks Holgander at 5'9" is going to be a better player than an equally talented Podkolzin who some people say is 6'3" 200 pounds and still growing.  

All I have ever said is that we don't know.

 

Podz could be better then EP I never said that Hoglander was better all I'm saying is that it would be stupid for a GM to say Podz is in the top 6 next season. HE HAS NOT EVEN PLAYED AND NHL Game.

 

What if Podz is terrible defensively.

 

Hoglander plays a great defensive game but lacks that pure offensive game but in the NHL coaches like when players play good defense don't believe me as Jake

Edited by Arrow 1983
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Alain Vigneault said:

For what it's worth, the Canucks under Jim Benning have now spent over 568M over the 7 years he's been here and they have 4 playoff series to show for it.

 

Pretty irresponsible if you ask me.

Go see if you can get a meeting with Aqua and show him your extensive experience in running a team, your budget and cap spend projections for the next 5 years and see if he'll give you Bennings job!

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 4petesake said:

I agree with this and I was a little surprised by it. Whining is what is done best on these boards. Remember all the handwringing about Tanev & Marky? Demko played well, Marky faltered and then everyone only complained about losing Tanev. Here’s a real world problem for you - Calgary is having to decide between exposing Giordano (their captain) or Tanev in the entry draft. Every team has big issues to deal with. While this contract might not be ideal it’s not something to lose our minds over.

They didn't lose a lot on the ice, but a big part of their early season failures can be directly attributed to a leadership void, and if they lose Sutter, Beagle and Pearson on top of Marky and Tanev they're in trouble I think.  Intangibles matter

  • Cheers 2
  • Vintage 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Elias Pettersson said:

If Hoglander is better than Podkolzin then why was Podkolzin the first round pick in that draft and Hoglander the second round pick?  What information do you have that confirms Hoglander will be better than Podkolzin?  Anything?  There is nobody out there who thinks Holgander at 5'9" is going to be a better player than an equally talented Podkolzin who some people say is 6'3" 200 pounds and still growing.  

I have a question do you believe Podz is coming in as a top 6 forward next season.

 

what kind of stats do you think he will put up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably could have picked up some bargains in the offseason with that 3.25mil... 

 

Benning is haunted by losing Toffoli rofl. Since he cant find buyers for Pearson, he decides to sign him instead of being accused of losing Pearson for free. We have already seen Pearson play for 3 not so full seasons, he is ok, but not someone you want on your top6 if you are competing for the Stanley Cup. 

 

Unfortunately, Pearson is our top6. Our 3rd line is a wreck that doesn't have much punch. 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Squamfan said:

only made it due to points percentage, had they lost there last game against the Islander they would have missed

But they did indeed make the playoffs even though without that last win they might not have.

 

It was your definitive assertion that they would have missed the playoffs had the season been completed fully that piqued my interest. It seemed like you were assuming they would continue to hiccup and flounder all the way to game 82, and I always find that kind of certainty from a fan/follower compelling. 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Petey_BOI said:

only 1.9 million available after buyout, would you buy out holtby to replace him with rittich,rinne,smith? hard to say what forsbergs value is maybe he is worth a shot?

only a 500k cap hit for next year: https://www.capfriendly.com/buyout-calculator/braden-holtby#results

 

But for sure we'll need a cheapie backup, at least until MD gets more games in 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said:

If Pearson scores 20+ goals each year of his new contract, then good signing. If he plays like he has this season, then WTF?

 

I thought other teams wanted Pearson. That would've been a good time for Benning to display some savvy GMing. 

So Benning re-signed a player that actual had interest around the league (=valuable player) and that's apparently a demonstration of non-savvy GMing.

 

How many 3.25 million players are regular 20+ goal scorers? He's currently the 186th highest paid forward which puts him at the bottom end of a top 6 player, which seems right in line of what he is.

 

Might need to re-evaluate the expectation versus reality.

  • Cheers 3
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

id say this contract is pretty fair. take a look.

 

RESULTS (29)
Stats displayed are season only · 1 GP required when sorting by stats
PLAYER TEAM AGE POS HANDED GP G A P P/GP +/- Sh Sh% TOI W L SO GAA Sv% CLAUSE EXPIRY CAP HIT SALARY
Colorado AvalancheCOL 28 RW Right 39 15 13 28 0.72 13 58 0.26 13:56 - - - - -   UFA $3,900,000 $2,900,000
New York IslandersNYI 27 C Right 38 11 12 23 0.61 8 61 0.18 16:56 - - - - - NTC UFA $5,000,000 $7,000,000
Washington CapitalsWSH 31 C Left 27 5 9 14 0.52 -4 38 0.13 15:45 - - - - -   UFA $3,500,000 $2,500,000
Carolina HurricanesCAR 28 RW Right 33 6 11 17 0.52 -1 27 0.22 15:08 - - - - -   UFA $2,000,000 $1,000,000
Pittsburgh PenguinsPIT 28 RW, LW Left 32 7 9 16 0.50 12 43 0.16 14:26 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $3,500,000 $3,500,000
Boston BruinsBOS 30 RW, C Right 35 6 11 17 0.49 7 85 0.07 14:53 - - - - -   UFA $3,100,000 $2,000,000
Ottawa SenatorsOTT 28 LW, RW, C Left 26 8 4 12 0.46 -1 34 0.24 13:16 - - - - -   UFA $3,375,000 $3,500,000
Minnesota WildMIN 29 C, LW, RW Left 20 5 3 8 0.40 -1 27 0.19 16:21 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $4,500,000 $4,000,000
Ottawa SenatorsOTT 31 RW, LW Left 40 11 4 15 0.38 -11 71 0.15 16:17 - - - - -   UFA $5,000,000 $3,500,000
Dallas StarsDAL 34 LW, RW Right 32 1 10 11 0.34 0 40 0.03 15:40 - - - - -   UFA $2,400,000 $2,000,000
Edmonton OilersEDM 29 RW Right 30 6 4 10 0.33 -5 37 0.16 12:19 - - - - -   UFA $2,150,000 $2,150,000
Detroit Red WingsDET 27 RW, LW, C Left 39 6 7 13 0.33 -2 67 0.09 16:09 - - - - -   UFA $2,000,000 $1,500,000
13. Eric Staal
Montreal CanadiensMTL 35 C Left 34 4 7 11 0.32 -21 63 0.06 15:38 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $3,250,000 $3,000,000
14. Paul Byron
Montreal CanadiensMTL 31 LW, RW Left 35 3 8 11 0.31 6 31 0.10 12:31 - - - - -   UFA $3,400,000 $2,800,000
Detroit Red WingsDET 36 C, LW Left 23 3 4 7 0.30 -2 11 0.27 14:38 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $3,000,000 $3,000,000
Nashville PredatorsNSH 27 LW, RW Right 32 8 1 9 0.28 -11 48 0.17 12:30 - - - - -   UFA $2,000,000 $2,000,000
St. Louis BluesSTL 34 C, RW Right 15 2 2 4 0.27 -4 18 0.11 13:27 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $5,000,000 $4,250,000
Dallas StarsDAL 33 LW Left 35 5 4 9 0.26 2 58 0.09 13:20 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $3,250,000 $3,250,000
Washington CapitalsWSH 31 LW Left 39 4 6 10 0.26 3 56 0.07 14:23 - - - - -   UFA $2,750,000 $2,700,000
Minnesota WildMIN 32 C Left 37 4 5 9 0.24 -3 48 0.08 14:46 - - - - -   UFA $4,100,000 $4,100,000
New York IslandersNYI 32 RW Right 37 3 6 9 0.24 -4 39 0.08 13:22 - - - - -   UFA $3,500,000 $2,500,000
Edmonton OilersEDM 29 RW Right 22 2 3 5 0.23 -3 15 0.13 12:21 - - - - -   UFA $3,200,000 $3,500,000
Chicago BlackhawksCHI 28 RW, LW Right 21 2 2 4 0.19 4 16 0.13 12:35 - - - - -   UFA $3,500,000 $3,500,000
24. Riley Nash
Columbus Blue JacketsCBJ 31 C, RW Right 37 2 5 7 0.19 -1 40 0.05 12:35 - - - - -   UFA $2,750,000 $2,750,000
Detroit Red WingsDET 33 C, LW, RW Left 32 2 4 6 0.19 -5 60 0.03 14:19 - - - - -   UFA $3,850,000 $3,000,000
New York IslandersNYI 33 RW, LW, C Left 22 0 4 4 0.18 7 20 0.00 12:29 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $3,000,000 $2,500,000
27. Jay Beagle
Vancouver CanucksVAN 34 C Right 30 1 4 5 0.17 -2 21 0.05 12:31 - - - - - M-NTC UFA $3,000,000 $2,200,000
Colorado AvalancheCOL 30 LW, RW Left 18 0 3 3 0.17 -2 26 0.00 13:48 - - - - -   UFA $2,850,000 $1,875,000
29. Cody Eakin
Buffalo SabresBUF 29 C Left 37 2 4 6 0.16 -6 32 0.06 13:14 - - - - -   UFA $2,250,000 $2,000,000
  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Arrow 1983 said:

All I have ever said is that we don't know.

 

Podz could be better then EP I never said that Hoglander was better all I'm saying is that it would be stupid for a GM to say Podz is in the top 6 next season. HE HAS NOT EVEN PLAYED AND NHL Game.

 

What if Podz is terrible defensively.

 

Hoglander plays a great defensive game but lacks that pure offensive game but in the NHL coaches like when players play good defense don't believe me as Jake

You've obviously never watched him play.  Podkolzin might be our best defensive forward as early as next year...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, theo5789 said:

So Benning re-signed a player that actual had interest around the league (=valuable player) and that's apparently a demonstration of non-savvy GMing.

 

How many 3.25 million players are regular 20+ goal scorers? He's currently the 186th highest paid forward which puts him at the bottom end of a top 6 player, which seems right in line of what he is.

 

Might need to re-evaluate the expectation versus reality.

if they're not young guys, they're crap

 

if it's not scottish it's crap on Make a GIF

  • Cheers 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, DarkIndianRises said:

I won’t pass my final judgment on this until the end of the summer as I want to see how things play out cap wise first.   My guess is that.....

 

1) Beagle will be LTIR next year

2) The Canucks have a plan in place for Eriksson.

3) Tryamkin will replace Edler

4) Boyd and Gaudette will be our 3rd and 4th line C’s (not necessarily in that order)

5) Benning expects someone to get claimed in the ED

6) Petey and Hughes will sign bridged Covid contracts (translation - for less money than we had originally expected).

 

As far as Pearson goes, the presence of Pearson or Podkolzin on the 3rd line should give us an opportunity to roll out three decent scoring lines, and one of Podz Or Pearson should be able to step into the top 6 in case of injuries.
 

that seems like the way it needs to go. That 3 and 4 C's tho.... yikes. 

 

Makes me wonder if Jim already has a deal in place to move Loui, because we really needed Pearson's salary to land a good 3C. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Arrow 1983 said:

I have a question do you believe Podz is coming in as a top 6 forward next season.

 

what kind of stats do you think he will put up

Well with Pearson signed at over $3 million I think they will either play Podkolzin in his natural position at RW across from BO and Pearson and bump Hoglander down to the 3rd line, or they will keep Hoglander on his off wing and bump Podkolzin down to the 3rd line.  I think Podkolzin is set to play with BO from day one so Hoglander will probably anchor the 3rd line.  At least we will have a stud on our 3rd line.  That's the only positive I get out of this.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve said this several times before. Everyone is all pumped about this new found cap space we are going to have in 2 years. Haha, it’s going to get used up before we even get there. We will never have cap space. As long as Jim Benning is the GM of the Canucks we will always be in cap trouble. This is right on par with all his other horrific contracts. So bitterly disappointing. 

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, theo5789 said:

So Benning re-signed a player that actual had interest around the league (=valuable player) and that's apparently a demonstration of non-savvy GMing.

 

How many 3.25 million players are regular 20+ goal scorers? He's currently the 186th highest paid forward which puts him at the bottom end of a top 6 player, which seems right in line of what he is.

 

Might need to re-evaluate the expectation versus reality.

we need a 3C more tho. Where does that $ come from? 

 

Even if you like the Pearson deal, that nixed an upgrade on a more important position, imo anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...