Wolfgang Durst Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 Jim hurry up . if you want to keep your job as Canucks GM you can't run out of time again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5Fivehole0 Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 21 hours ago, Fred65 said: Funny if you go to the Prospects forum Vcr has a barn full of quality prospects, but apprently not good enough for the NHL. At some point prospects must become NHL players Good Prospects =/= NHL player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred65 Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 1 hour ago, Wolfgang Durst said: Jim hurry up . if you want to keep your job as Canucks GM you can't run out of time again. Yep time management seems to be an elusive thing for Jim.. It's going to be an insult to the fans if he offers Pearson the same as Toffoli was paid in Mtl. Of the two as much as I think Pearson is a solid player I'd have taken Toffoli over him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinatcc Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 16 hours ago, Fred65 said: Yep time management seems to be an elusive thing for Jim.. It's going to be an insult to the fans if he offers Pearson the same as Toffoli was paid in Mtl. If this were to happen I think this will happen next Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfgang Durst Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 Pearson’s injury and his contract situation Sportsnet: Chris Johnston on Sportsnet on Vancouver Canucks injured forward and pending UFA Tanner Pearson. “Tanner Pearson, he’s been out injured with an ankle injury. He’s sought some secondary opinions, and so far the news on that has been positive. In fact, he’s hoping potentially to get skating sometime here in the next week. Which is noteably well ahead of the April 12th trade deadline. As a pending unrestricted free agent, that’s important for Vancouver. They have a decisions on his future. Negotiations on his next contract really haven’t begun yet at all. And if that deal doesn’t come around before the trade deadline, I would expect they’ll explore the trade market on Pearson.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted March 30, 2021 Author Share Posted March 30, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squamfan Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 1 minute ago, -Vintage Canuck- said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squamfan Posted March 31, 2021 Share Posted March 31, 2021 get ready for another 4x4.75 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted March 31, 2021 Share Posted March 31, 2021 32 minutes ago, Squamfan said: get ready for another 4x4.75 Get ready for more pessimistic one-liners 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kootenay Gold Posted March 31, 2021 Share Posted March 31, 2021 25 minutes ago, -AJ- said: Get ready for more pessimistic one-liners Probably a whole lot more than just one liners. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirkSave Posted March 31, 2021 Share Posted March 31, 2021 (edited) 3 x 3.88...who do we appreciate? p e a r s o n is my pearsonal fave! more term and aav than this should not happen IMHO Edited March 31, 2021 by KirkSave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted March 31, 2021 Share Posted March 31, 2021 (edited) save room for tryamkin Benn-2 edler- resign for 3 mill = -3 Baertschi out - 2.2 - no need for replacement spooner out- 1.0 - no need for replacement Hamonic - resign league min? no to chatfield - 0.7 - no need to be replace buy Sutter 4.375 Hawryluk - 0.8 . = - 14 mill ? hotly to Seattle? - 4.3 = -18.3 Demko = 3.75 Petey = 6.75 Hughes = 6.5 = 17 remainder = 1.3 mill ? Ferland..? retire = -3.5 mill Do tryamkin 2.75 x 2 years what to do with Virtanen? Miller Petey Boeser Pearson Horvat Hogz Podz Lowry (3.1) x 3 yrs Gaudette Mackewan Beagle Coleman (2.2) x 2 yrs Lind Edler (3) Myers 6 Hughes (6.5) Schmidt (5.95) Tryamkin (2.75) Hamonic (1.00) Ollie Edited March 31, 2021 by Canucks Curse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toyotasfan Posted March 31, 2021 Share Posted March 31, 2021 Pearson’s OK , the team is Ok , let’s just keep striving to be , OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted March 31, 2021 Share Posted March 31, 2021 16 hours ago, Toyotasfan said: Pearson’s OK , the team is Ok , let’s just keep striving to be , OK. 2nd line Pearson is 'ok'. I would imagine the idea to extend him would be transitioning him to 3rd line, as Podkolzin gets acclimated. 2nd line Podkolzin and 3rd line Pearson is 'good'. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks25 Posted March 31, 2021 Share Posted March 31, 2021 Don't see how keeping him around makes sense unless he signs a very low AAV deal with security. Hoping the talks with the agent are just for trade leverage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EternalCanuckFan Posted March 31, 2021 Share Posted March 31, 2021 27 minutes ago, aGENT said: 2nd line Pearson is 'ok'. I would imagine the idea to extend him would be transitioning him to 3rd line, as Podkolzin gets acclimated. 2nd line Podkolzin and 3rd line Pearson is 'good'. Agreed, but also depends on Pearson's $ and term. Around $3.75M again for 4-years would be bad, IMHO. I could stomach it if they find a way to move Roussel and/or Beagle (much less likely with Beagle given our lack of C depth), but if the Canucks are to spend money anywhere, then I think it would be better spent on the D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted March 31, 2021 Share Posted March 31, 2021 2 minutes ago, EternalCanuckFan said: Agreed, but also depends on Pearson's $ and term. Around $3.75M again for 4-years would be bad, IMHO. I could stomach it if they find a way to move Roussel and/or Beagle (much less likely with Beagle given our lack of C depth), but if the Canucks are to spend money anywhere, then I think it would be better spent on the D. Of course it does. Personally I don't think Pearson's getting anything like that in the current market. I'm thinking we may buyout Roussel. Beagle isn't going anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted March 31, 2021 Share Posted March 31, 2021 20 minutes ago, kanucks25 said: Don't see how keeping him around makes sense unless he signs a very low AAV deal with security. Hoping the talks with the agent are just for trade leverage. yeah I'm kind of with you here. I really don't want to see term with Pearson unless its something really low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks25 Posted March 31, 2021 Share Posted March 31, 2021 18 hours ago, Toyotasfan said: Pearson’s OK , the team is Ok , let’s just keep striving to be , OK. "Well at least we're not Buffalo" CDC's #1 phrase 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honky Cat Posted March 31, 2021 Share Posted March 31, 2021 2 hours ago, EternalCanuckFan said: Agreed, but also depends on Pearson's $ and term. Around $3.75M again for 4-years would be bad, IMHO. I could stomach it if they find a way to move Roussel and/or Beagle (much less likely with Beagle given our lack of C depth), but if the Canucks are to spend money anywhere, then I think it would be better spent on the D. Anything above $3Mx 3 years would be absolutely preposterous Even that $3M is way to high.imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now