DeNiro Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 1 minute ago, Warhippy said: Subban is a D man. A point producing one. They're actually solid on the GAA but two young guys to grow with their emerging core while shedding that contract is far from out of the realms of possibility They need D-man that can help them in the NHL. Subban is not there yet, might never be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Mountain Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 1 hour ago, John McClane said: Tanev for Kane is too much. The Canucks overpay. Tanev for Kane and a 1st is an overpayment for Buffalo.. Tanev and Jake for Kane and Sam R. Is that a happy compromise? ^ I think this is not that far off. Benning was over the moon for Sam Reinhardt heading into that draft. Im pretty sure we would have to add a 2nd or a roster player like Sven. Not sure Buffalo wants to trade Reinhardt , especially when they are struggling to score goals and Eichel is still hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanuckGAME Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 Kane is over rated. He is not what this team needs. Not even a little. Besides. Look what the Devils got for Larsson. Tanev>Larsson Hall>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Kane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 1 hour ago, Canucks Curse said: if we are trading Tanev, I would hope its for more of a sure fire top 6 player. Tanev + Virtanen for Landeskog and 3rd 2017. Tanev + CBJ 2nd for Draisiatl ( I don't want RNH) Tanev for Ehlers Tanev + CBJ 2nd for Nylander Tanev for Barzal and NYI 2nd (heck Griffin cost a 1st and 2nd) and 5th Tanev + CBJ 2nd for Saad Tanev +3rd for Konecny + 2nd Tanev + Virtanen for Tiffoli + 3rd Tanev + CBJ 2nd for Sam Reinhart + 3rd these are the types of trades that make more sense Problems is most of those teams have no need for another RHD Avs have Barrie and Johnson Oilers might be interested although they do have Larsen, Sekera and Reinhart. They wouldn't trade Leon for subban so tanev is out Jets have Byfuglein, Myers, Trouba Devils maybe Flyers maybe Kings maybe they do have doughty as there number one d Sabres have Risto bogo franson CBJ has Jones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 2 hours ago, Canucks Curse said: Tanev for Ehlers Chevy and Co: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c00kies Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 4 hours ago, NEON.KNEE said: Did Winnipeg actually turn down a 1st for Trouba? Tanev is worth more than Trouba imo I disagree with that. Trouba is a young playmaking d-man that is on the rise. Tanev would be more of a TD deal to a competitor, while Trouba would be more of an off-season move (to any team). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 1 hour ago, DeNiro said: They need D-man that can help them in the NHL. Subban is not there yet, might never be. Did you watch tonight's game? Not like he could have hurt.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missioncanucksfan Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 58 minutes ago, SilentSam said: What the Sabres Defence Sutuation might look like.. http://www.diebytheblade.com/2016/11/12/13609516/sabres-d-deep-diving-into-what-the-back-end-needs That's a good read but I sense it's the bloggers wet dream that Minnesota has cap space or willing to cough up good young D such as Brodin for Kane. They have promising prospects such as Tuch and Gilmore waiting in the wings along with Eriksson Ek to go with 6 forwards with NMC's. He mentions Fowler as does every other blogger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c00kies Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 2 hours ago, John McClane said: Tanev for Kane is too much. The Canucks overpay. Tanev for Kane and a 1st is an overpayment for Buffalo.. Tanev and Jake for Kane and Sam R. Is that a happy compromise? I'd be happy with that, but I just can't see Buffalo trading Reinhart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 5 hours ago, S'all Good Man said: I'd be OK with Tanev for Kane + Buffalo's 1st rounder. But 1 for 1, god no. I'm down if we trade Larsen for Malkin and Crosby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 2 hours ago, Davathor said: Yeah the same. Except Kane scored 20 goals in under 70 games And heres the catch He did it in the NHL Yea and he got arrested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldoescobar Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 Tanev is not better than Larson. Tanev is not anywhere close to getting you Trouba or Ehlers even if the jets needed. Kane+SR is going to cost a heck of a lot more than Tanev + Virt lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missioncanucksfan Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 1 hour ago, DeNiro said: Don't see him as a top pairing guy. A solid top 4 most likely. Not saying I would do that deal, but that's likely the ballpark of Buffalo's asking price. Gotta remember Hutton is a relative unknown around the league. Other GMs aren't gonna attach as much value to him as we do. Ohhhhhh me thinks Hutton is known well enough throughout the league Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaNuCkSLoUiE23 Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 Please not Tanev for Kane. I'll riot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squamfan Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 3 hours ago, Green⌃Arrow said: Put Kane with the Sedins and make him roommates with them. That way he will pick up some good manners and class. OR HE WILL MAKE THE SEDINS COCAINE ADDICTS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 I really do not want Kane I would be upset big time but if benning does it we better get more back the just Kane,like Kane and their best young prospect and we could add a 4th,anything less pass big time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJDDawg Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 12 minutes ago, missioncanucksfan said: Ohhhhhh me thinks Hutton is known well enough throughout the league Bob McKenzie mentioned today Hutton as a possibility in a Kane deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RakuRaku Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 Make it happen or somebody should get fired!! Ppl should stop going to the games to let Ownership know we've had enough! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 2 minutes ago, MJDDawg said: Bob McKenzie mentioned today Hutton as a possibility in a Kane deal. That's a little more even than Tanev one for one. Cap wise it wouldn't work though. If they did that then it means they have faith in Tryamkin, Juolevi and possibly Brisebois going forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 45 minutes ago, Chris12345 said: I'm down if we trade Larsen for Malkin and Crosby. why didn't i think of that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.