Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Signing] Canucks sign Tucker Poolman


Recommended Posts

Just now, Caboose said:

That seems pretty aggressively bad. Why would Vancouver sign the guy Winnipeg replaced with Schmidt to replace Schmidt lol.

This guy is a DD. Schmidt is not.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AV. said:

"aS uSuAL nO cOmMeNt oN tHe beTtER siGnInGs"

Pretty dishonest if that's what you call a good comment.

 

Benning absolutely deserves an A+ for overhauling his previous mistakes (with help from owner) and loading up players that will make a difference. He just finished his team in 1 day (not really)

 

And all you can say is one step forward, one step back.

 

I only question the Poolman deal, but everything else you literally can't complain at all. You're the one who is not objective.

  • Like 1
  • Cheers 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bit too rich for a bottom pairing defenseman. Why give him four years and Hamonic only two? That I don't get. Was hoping for a larger, more physical specimen. Not a huge fan of this signing. Oh well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a fan of Poolman, and really wish it was a 2 year deal. 4 years is a lot to commit to a bottom pairing dman we haven't seen yet. 

 

This also brings us back to being defensive while struggling to transition the puck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Caboose said:

That seems pretty aggressively bad. Why would Vancouver sign the guy Winnipeg replaced with Schmidt to replace Schmidt lol.

Agree that’s pretty Aggressive term and AAV.

 

but the joke should be on Winnipeg, they replace a guy with higher cap from a team that didn’t make the playoff.  We got a cheaper guy from a better team, if we analyzing Smchidt vs Poolman I think we win, but still question the term

  • Thanks 1
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny how squam says absolutely nothing about the obviously good signings.

 

Can we ban this guy already? All he does is antagonize fans without bringing anything meaningful here.

  • Cheers 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said:

A bit too rich for a bottom pairing defenseman. Why give him four years and Hamonic only two? That I don't get. Was hoping for a larger, more physical specimen. Not a huge fan of this signing. Oh well. 

Must have had a lot of interest. I haven’t followed him so I’ll reserve judgement until he plays some games. He’s big though 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...