Bertuzzipunch Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 8 minutes ago, Timråfan said: Maybe Benning wants to trade for a center, Monahan. Clean swap... interesting, i wonder if calgary is looking for a top 4 D? Tho we will need to sign 2 RHD thru free agency or trades. He would be a nice combo with podz imo but idk seems a bit risky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post tas Posted June 1, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted June 1, 2021 monahan's dumber than a sack of hammers. pass. 4 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptKirk888 Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 8 hours ago, Me_ said: Canucks open to moving Schmidt What are the thoughts on that? It feels as if his enthusiasm wasn’t overly shared. Yet he rest of the team, to the point that Holtby had to tell him to lower the amplitude… Is he not a fit then? Schmidt + for Jones? Pure fodder bait for discussion, troll away trolls and defend nuks enthusiasts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 I would wait for a reliable source. I am not adverse to trading Schmidt, but only if we get a return for him. Post expansion draft there are going to be a bunch of teams who lost a top 4D and will need to replace that roster spot. After expansion I would think Schmidt has more value than what we paid for him. Ideally we add a top 4D and don’t just subtract one. Hughes-Hamonic Schmidt-Ristolainen (or another RHD Juolevi/Rathbone-Myers Bowie Platoon Juolevi and Rathbone for about 50 games each. See who can nail down that 3rd pairing spot. Hopefully a couple of years of Hamonic bus us time to find/develop a replacement. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 1 hour ago, Bertuzzipunch said: interesting, i wonder if calgary is looking for a top 4 D? Tho we will need to sign 2 RHD thru free agency or trades. He would be a nice combo with podz imo but idk seems a bit risky They don't have the protection spots to add a top 4 D before the ED. As it sits now one of Tanev, Giordano, Hanafin or Anderson will be exposed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 2 minutes ago, coryberg said: They don't have the protection spots to add a top 4 D before the ED. As it sits now one of Tanev, Giordano, Hanafin or Anderson will be exposed. Gio will be exposed unless CGY makes a deal with Seattle. If Gio is exposed Seattle will take him. He'll have 1 year left and would be a pretty nice trading chip at the TD if Seattle isn't all that good next year 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24K PureCool Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 What do these guys mean selling low? Don't think it can get lower than a 3rd round pick for Schmidt. Also, if we trade him it is more equivalent players or significant futures. There is no reason to trade him away to even begin with. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 9 hours ago, zimmy said: The team would be selling low. That would be an example of poor management (unless the trading partner is completely hornswoggled) if this rumour were true. we got him for a third because vegas had crazy cap problem pretty sure we can get a late 1st for the guy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlwaysACanuckFan Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 10 hours ago, PhillipBlunt said: What I'm really blown away by is that there are people out there who would actually pay a subscription to the Athletic to read an article written by Thomas Drance. What a waste of money 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 1 hour ago, AlwaysACanuckFan said: What a waste of money 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 for me I'd do it if Edler comes back cheap and trade Schmidt with JV and a pick to get a decent RHD that can shoot the puck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timråfan Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 9 hours ago, Bertuzzipunch said: interesting, i wonder if calgary is looking for a top 4 D? Tho we will need to sign 2 RHD thru free agency or trades. He would be a nice combo with podz imo but idk seems a bit risky He's the right age and quite experianced. I was surprised by his point ratio. I saw a comment about dumb. If Virtanen had put up as many points as Monahan I wouldn'tbother. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted June 1, 2021 Author Share Posted June 1, 2021 1 hour ago, Timråfan said: He's the right age and quite experianced. I was surprised by his point ratio. I saw a comment about dumb. If Virtanen had put up as many points as Monahan I wouldn'tbother. Experiance! What a coincidance! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksJay Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 8 hours ago, canuktravella said: we got him for a third because vegas had crazy cap problem pretty sure we can get a late 1st for the guy But asset management! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShawnAntoski Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 (edited) Taught this was a conspiracy theory debunked by JB and other (learned) posters - now there is a thread about this ? Edited June 1, 2021 by ShawnAntoski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShawnAntoski Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 19 hours ago, Dirtman said: I don't see why we would move him after the abysmal season everyone had. Give everyone another year to gel IMO. One more year under Baumers system - takes time to learned such a complex system. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPA Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 1 minute ago, ShawnAntoski said: One more year under Baumers system - takes time to learned such a complex system. Also he had almost zero practices to get it right. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 20 hours ago, Me_ said: Canucks open to moving Schmidt What are the thoughts on that? It feels as if his enthusiasm wasn’t overly shared. Yet he rest of the team, to the point that Holtby had to tell him to lower the amplitude… Is he not a fit then? Schmidt + for Jones? would appreciate if OPs put the 'substance' of these rumours in the OP - so you're not creating click bait for these attention seeker 'sources'. reading through the thread it's obvious the source is peripheral garbage - and a waste of time. 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deus.ex.makina Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 Schmidt for Tanev 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted June 1, 2021 Author Share Posted June 1, 2021 3 minutes ago, deus.ex.makina said: Schmidt for Tanev CRY Schmidt Holtby VAN Tanev Markstrom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts